IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v27y2000i5p527-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining attributes for scorecard construction in credit scoring

Author

Listed:
  • David Hand
  • Niall Adams

Abstract

In many domains, simple forms of classification rules are needed because of requirements such as ease of use. A particularly simple form splits each variable into just a few categories, assigns weights to the categories, sums the weights for a new object to be classified, and produces a classification by comparing the score with a threshold. Such instruments are often called scorecards. We describe a way to find the best partition of each variable using a simulated annealing strategy. We present theoretical and empirical comparisons of two such additive models, one based on weights of evidence and another based on logistic regression.

Suggested Citation

  • David Hand & Niall Adams, 2000. "Defining attributes for scorecard construction in credit scoring," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 527-540.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:27:y:2000:i:5:p:527-540
    DOI: 10.1080/02664760050076371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02664760050076371
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664760050076371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. S. C. Ehrenberg & J. A. Bound, 1993. "Predictability and Prediction," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 156(2), pages 167-194, March.
    2. Gerald T. O'Connor & Harold C. Sox JR, 1991. "Bayesian Reasoning in Medicine," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(2), pages 107-111, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S M Finlay, 2006. "Predictive models of expenditure and over-indebtedness for assessing the affordability of new consumer credit applications," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(6), pages 655-669, June.
    2. Dean Fantazzini & Silvia Figini, 2009. "Random Survival Forests Models for SME Credit Risk Measurement," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 29-45, March.
    3. Robert Till & David Hand, 2003. "Behavioural models of credit card usage," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(10), pages 1201-1220.
    4. Zhiyong Li & Xinyi Hu & Ke Li & Fanyin Zhou & Feng Shen, 2020. "Inferring the outcomes of rejected loans: an application of semisupervised clustering," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(2), pages 631-654, February.
    5. Andreeva, Galina & Calabrese, Raffaella & Osmetti, Silvia Angela, 2016. "A comparative analysis of the UK and Italian small businesses using Generalised Extreme Value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 506-516.
    6. Robert B. Avery & Kenneth P. Brevoort & Glenn Canner, 2012. "Does Credit Scoring Produce a Disparate Impact?," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 40, pages 65-114, December.
    7. Izabela Majer, 2006. "Application scoring: logit model approach and the divergence method compared," Working Papers 17, Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics.
    8. A. C. Antonakis & M. E. Sfakianakis, 2009. "Assessing naive Bayes as a method for screening credit applicants," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 537-545.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phua, Peilin & Kennedy, Rachel & Trinh, Giang & Page, Bill & Hartnett, Nicole, 2020. "Examining older consumers’ loyalty towards older brands in grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Lindsay, R. Murray, 1995. "Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 35-53, January.
    3. R. Murray Lindsay, 1994. "Publication System Biases Associated with the Statistical Testing Paradigm," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 33-57, June.
    4. Hubbard, Raymond & Lindsay, R. Murray, 2013. "The significant difference paradigm promotes bad science," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1393-1397.
    5. Salisu, Afees A. & Olaniran, Abeeb & Tchankam, Jean Paul, 2022. "Oil tail risk and the tail risk of the US Dollar exchange rates," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Page, Bill & Sharp, Anne & Lockshin, Larry & Sorensen, Herb, 2018. "Parents and children in supermarkets: Incidence and influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 31-39.
    7. Gavin Lees & Maxwell Winchester & Sidath Silva, 2016. "Demographic product segmentation in financial services products in Australia and New Zealand," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 240-250, September.
    8. Jan Svanberg & Tohid Ardeshiri & Isak Samsten & Peter Öhman & Presha E. Neidermeyer & Tarek Rana & Natalia Semenova & Mats Danielson, 2022. "Corporate governance performance ratings with machine learning," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 50-68, January.
    9. Hubbard, Raymond & Lindsay, R. Murray, 2013. "From significant difference to significant sameness: Proposing a paradigm shift in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1377-1388.
    10. Hubbard, Raymond & Vetter, Daniel E., 1996. "An empirical comparison of published replication research in accounting, economics, finance, management, and marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 153-164, February.
    11. Zachary Anesbury & Maxwell Winchester & Rachel Kennedy, 2017. "Brand user profiles seldom change and seldom differ," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 523-535, December.
    12. Gaunt, J. L. & Riley, Janet & Stein, A. & Penning de Vries, F. W. T., 1997. "Requirements for effective modelling strategies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 153-168, June.
    13. Jella Pfeiffer & Thies Pfeiffer & Martin Meißner & Elisa Weiß, 2020. "Eye-Tracking-Based Classification of Information Search Behavior Using Machine Learning: Evidence from Experiments in Physical Shops and Virtual Reality Shopping Environments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 675-691, September.
    14. Uncles, Mark D. & Kwok, Simon, 2013. "Designing research with in-built differentiated replication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1398-1405.
    15. Paul B Conn & Devin S Johnson & Peter L Boveng, 2015. "On Extrapolating Past the Range of Observed Data When Making Statistical Predictions in Ecology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:27:y:2000:i:5:p:527-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.