IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjhp/v2y2002i2p127-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovery of land costs: a land policy instrument missing in the Netherlands?

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Priemus
  • Erik Louw

Abstract

Until recently it has been usual in the Netherlands for local authorities to acquire land for development, to prepare it for building, and then make building lots available through sale or leasehold. In the 1990s housing production shifted from social housing to owner-occupied housing. Project developers became interested in the ownership of land as the key to build dwellings. These land purchases changed the context in which local authorities had to operate in the development of land. Instead of making arrangements for the recovery of costs via a public monopoly, local authorities now have to revert to a set of statutory instruments, or enter negotiations with market parties to come to an agreement on a voluntary contribution to development costs. In this contribution, we report the current state of the discussion in the Netherlands on the recovery of costs and we analyse various alternative instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Priemus & Erik Louw, 2002. "Recovery of land costs: a land policy instrument missing in the Netherlands?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 127-146.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjhp:v:2:y:2002:i:2:p:127-146
    DOI: 10.1080/14616710210140330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14616710210140330
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14616710210140330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larry D. Singell & Jane H. Lillydahl, 1990. "An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Impact Fees on the Housing Market," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 66(1), pages 82-92.
    2. John Bowers, 1992. "The Economics of Planning Gain: a re-appraisal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(8), pages 1329-1339, December.
    3. Andrew R. Watkins, 1999. "Impacts of Land Development Charges," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 75(3), pages 415-424.
    4. Jonathan C. Levine, 1994. "Equity in Infrastructure Finance: When Are Impact Fees Justified?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 70(2), pages 210-222.
    5. Barrie Needham & Roelof Verhage, 1998. "The Effects of Land Policy: Quantity as well as Quality is Important," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(1), pages 25-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Or Levkovich & Jan Rouwendal, 2016. "Spatial Planning and Segmentation of the Land Market," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-018/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Hugo Priemus & Erik Louw, 2003. "Changes in Dutch Land Policy: From Monopoly towards Competition in the Building Market," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(3), pages 369-378, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Anderson, 2005. "Taxes and Fees as Forms of Land Use Regulation," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 413-427, December.
    2. Adam Found, 2021. "Development Charges and Housing Affordability: A False Dichotomy?," IMFG Papers 56, University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
    3. Quigley, John M. & Swoboda, Aaron M., 2007. "The urban impacts of the Endangered Species Act: A general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 299-318, March.
    4. Nae-Young Choei & Hyungkyoo Kim & Seonghun Kim, 2020. "Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Fiorentina Angjellari-Dajci & Richard Cebula & Robert Boylan & C. Izard & George Gresham, 2015. "The Impact of Taxes and HOA Fees on Single-Family Home Prices," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 21(2), pages 201-211, May.
    6. Waldorf, Brigitte S. & Byun, Pillsung & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2005. "Strategic Interaction and Spatial Multiplier Effects in Local Growth Control Policies: The California Housing Market," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19574, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Mark Skidmore, 2014. "Housing Affordability: Lessons from the United States," Treasury Working Paper Series 14/11, New Zealand Treasury.
    8. Ihlanfeldt, Keith R. & Shaughnessy, Timothy M., 2004. "An empirical investigation of the effects of impact fees on housing and land markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 639-661, November.
    9. Ellen Hanak, 2008. "Is Water Policy Limiting Residential Growth? Evidence from California," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(1), pages 31-50.
    10. Xiaofang Dong & Shihe Fu & Yufei Yuan, 2013. "Impact Fees and Real Estate Prices: Evidence from 35 Chinese Cities," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 8(2), pages 207-219, June.
    11. Jordan, Jeffrey L., 1998. "Georgia Water Series -- Issue 4: Issues In Water Pricing," Faculty Series 16652, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. Brueckner, Jan K., 1997. "Infrastructure financing and urban development:: The economics of impact fees," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 383-407, December.
    13. repec:wyi:journl:002181 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Yinger, John, 1998. "The Incidence of Development Fees and Special Assessments," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 51(n. 1), pages 23-41, March.
    15. Andrejs Skaburskis & Mohammad Qadeer, 1992. "An Empirical Estimation of the Price Effects of Development Impact Fees," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 653-667, June.
    16. Yinger, John, 1998. "The Incidence of Development Fees and Special Assessments," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 51(1), pages 23-41, March.
    17. Koetter, Theo & Sikder, Sujit Kumar & Weiss, Dominik, 2021. "The cooperative urban land development model in Germany - An effective instrument to support affordable housing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Aguilar-Benitez, Ismael, 2011. "El cobro por una factibilidad sostenible del agua y el crecimiento urbano disperso en el norte de México [Payment for urban water feasibility and the urban dispersed growth in Northern Mexico (a pr," MPRA Paper 36481, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. McFarlane, Alastair, 1999. "Taxes, Fees, and Urban Development," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 416-436, November.
    20. Mark Skidmore, 2014. "Housing Affordability: Lessons from the United States," Treasury Working Paper Series 14/11, New Zealand Treasury.
    21. Quigley, John M. & Swoboda, Aaron, 2006. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of Land Use Restrictions and Residential Welfare," Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy, Working Paper Series qt11k4p0vt, Berkeley Program on Housing and Urban Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjhp:v:2:y:2002:i:2:p:127-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.