IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v34y2004i1p25-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-executive directors in the Netherlands: another expectations gap?

Author

Listed:
  • Reggy Hooghiemstra
  • Jaap Manen

Abstract

Notwithstanding the importance of non-executives as a control mechanism to reduce the potential divergence between corporate management and shareholders and the increasing attention they receive from both regulators as well as the media, research concerning non-executives is still in its infancy. This dearth of knowledge may account for the unrealistic expectations the public is said to have of non-executive directors. However, no study has previously looked into possible expectations gaps regarding non-executive directors. This study fills that lacuna and reports the results of a survey sent to more than 1,000 non-executive directors, employee representatives, and institutional investors from the Netherlands. Although we do not find an expectations gap regarding nonexecutive directors' main function, gaps are found with respect to stakeholders' satisfaction with current functioning of non-executive directors and non-executives' roles concerning directors' remuneration. Furthermore, a gap is also present with respect to the interests non-executive directors should serve. The results indicate that, notwithstanding the Cadbury and Peters Committees, the public's confidence in corporate governance has not yet been fully restored.

Suggested Citation

  • Reggy Hooghiemstra & Jaap Manen, 2004. "Non-executive directors in the Netherlands: another expectations gap?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 25-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:34:y:2004:i:1:p:25-41
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2004.9729949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729949
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeroen Weimer & Joost Pape, 1999. "A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 152-166, April.
    2. Terry McNulty & Andrew Pettigrew, 1996. "The Contribution, Power and Influence of Part‐time Board Members," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 160-179, July.
    3. Elizabeth Carson, 2002. "Factors Associated with the Development of Board Sub–committees," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 4-18, January.
    4. Stiles, Philip & Taylor, Bernard, 2001. "Boards at Work: How Directors View their Roles and Responsibilities," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198288763, Decembrie.
    5. Gregory Maassen & Frans Van Den Bosch, 1999. "On the Supposed Independence of Two‐tier Boards: formal structure and reality in the Netherlands," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 31-37, January.
    6. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    7. Jay Dahya & John J. McConnell & Nickolaos G. Travlos, 2002. "The Cadbury Committee, Corporate Performance, and Top Management Turnover," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 461-483, February.
    8. Rienk Goodijk, 2000. "Corporate Governance and Workers’ Participation," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(4), pages 303-310, October.
    9. Lex Donaldson & James H. Davis, 1994. "Boards and Company Performance ‐ Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(3), pages 151-160, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niamh Brennan, 2006. "Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: is there an expectations gap?," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 577-593, November.
    2. Mitchell Bryce & Muhammad Jahangir Ali & Paul R. Mather, 2021. "Director expectations gap and hindsight bias," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2965-2996, June.
    3. Narendra Bhana, 2016. "The Stock Market Reaction to Board Changes: The South African Experience," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 15(3), pages 269-294, December.
    4. Linda Höglund & Maria Mårtensson & Aswo Safari, 2018. "Expectations and the performance of governance functions between a board, management and other stakeholders: the case of Robotdalen," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 805-827, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean Bédard & Daniel Coulombe & Lucie Courteau, 2008. "Audit Committee, Underpricing of IPOs, and Accuracy of Management Earnings Forecasts," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(6), pages 519-535, November.
    2. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    3. Niamh Brennan, 2006. "Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: is there an expectations gap?," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 577-593, November.
    4. Eugenio Zubeltzu-Jaka & Eduardo Ortas & Igor Álvarez-Etxeberria, 2019. "Independent Directors and Organizational Performance: New Evidence from A Meta-Analytic Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Polovina, Nereida & Peasnell, Ken, 2020. "Do minority acquisitions transfer better corporate governance practices? An analysis of UK's cross-border minority investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    6. Miozzo, Marcela & Dewick, Paul, 2002. "Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 989-1008, August.
    7. David Hillier & Patrick McColgan, 2008. "An analysis of majority owner‐managed companies in the UK," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(4), pages 603-623, December.
    8. Brogi, Marina & Lagasio, Valentina, 2022. "Better safe than sorry. Bank corporate governance, risk-taking, and performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    9. Panagiotis Staikouras & Christos Staikouras & Maria-Eleni Agoraki, 2007. "The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-27, February.
    10. Paolo Tenuta & Domenico Rocco Cambrea & Debora Fazzari, 2018. "Are All Independent Directors the Same? Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 1-78, August.
    11. Arunima Haldar & S. V. D. Nageswara Rao & Kirankumar S. Momaya, 2016. "Can Flexibility in Corporate Governance Enhance International Competitiveness? Evidence from Knowledge-Based Industries in India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(4), pages 389-402, December.
    12. Randy Beavers & Shawn Mobbs, 2020. "Director overconfidence," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 49(2), pages 389-422, June.
    13. Nguyen, Tuan & Nguyen, An & Nguyen, Mau & Truong, Thuyen, 2021. "Is national governance quality a key moderator of the boardroom gender diversity–firm performance relationship? International evidence from a multi-hierarchical analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 370-390.
    14. Leo Vashkor Dewri, 2022. "A Critical Assessment of Interrelationship Among Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, Refined Economic Value Added to Measure Firm Value and Return on Stock," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2718-2759, December.
    15. M. Ameziane Lasfer, 2006. "The Interrelationship Between Managerial Ownership and Board Structure," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7‐8), pages 1006-1033, September.
    16. Annita Florou, 2005. "Top Director Shake-up: The Link between Chairman and CEO Dismissal in the UK," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1-2), pages 97-128.
    17. Andrea Melis, 2011. "Martin Hilb: New corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(3), pages 509-514, August.
    18. Yuan George Shan, 2019. "Managerial ownership, board independence and firm performance," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(2), pages 203-220, July.
    19. Franco Ernesto Rubino & Paolo Tenuta & Domenico Rocco Cambrea, 2017. "Board characteristics effects on performance in family and non-family business: a multi-theoretical approach," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(3), pages 623-658, September.
    20. Guest, Paul M., 2008. "The determinants of board size and composition: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 51-72, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:34:y:2004:i:1:p:25-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.