IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v29y2016i5d10.1007_s11213-016-9375-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Study of Interdisciplinary Cooperation on Computer and English: A Case Study of Aletheia University Participated in International Volunteer Service Learning to Inner Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Chin Su

    (Aletheia University)

  • Tzong-Heng Chi

    (Aletheia University)

Abstract

This action research encompasses both descriptive and prescriptive treatment of the process and outcomes of an international and interdisciplinary volunteer service learning project. The project was held in a Junior High School in Suniteyou, Xilingol League in Inner Mongolia. The descriptive, qualitative aspect captures the reflections and thoughts of volunteer-service students. Sample participants include two teachers and fourteen students (five from the department of English, and nine from Information Management) from Aletheia University. It is found that service learning provides benefits to both service providers and service receivers. The target student population benefited from improved motivation and enhanced educational resources. Simultaneously, volunteer students (service providers) received numerous benefits, such as (1) mutually beneficial interaction with students from other departments, in conjunction with help from the teachers; (2) positive spillover effects from the service receiver students’ learning enthusiasm; (3) expanded knowledge base through an active and effective task-based project (4) in conjunction with guided reflection, the project promoted positive attitudes, critical thinking and self-growth (5) experience that fosters professionalism; (6) happiness through accomplishing goals and helping others. The researchers also observed a number of problems during the service and the interdisciplinary cooperation. Even though the results showed that service provider students’ learning effectiveness developed after participating the interdisciplinary cooperation; the study also discusses the interdisciplinary cooperation on students’ impact and how interdisciplinary cooperation helped the volunteer students. Finally, this study provides many prescriptive observations for improvement. It is hoped that this study will promote the practice of offering service-learning opportunities in higher education to influence and encourage students to become active participants in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Chin Su & Tzong-Heng Chi, 2016. "A Qualitative Study of Interdisciplinary Cooperation on Computer and English: A Case Study of Aletheia University Participated in International Volunteer Service Learning to Inner Mongolia," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 485-516, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:29:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s11213-016-9375-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-016-9375-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-016-9375-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-016-9375-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsee, Christopher K., 1996. "The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 247-257, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucius Caviola & Nadira Faulmüller & Jim. A. C. Everett & Julian Savulescu & Guy Kahane, 2014. "The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(4), pages 303-315, July.
    2. Moore, Don A., 1999. "Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 146-165, May.
    3. Stefania Pighin & Lucia Savadori & Elisa Barilli & Rino Rumiati & Sara Bonalumi & Maurizio Ferrari & Laura Cremonesi, 2013. "Using Comparison Scenarios to Improve Prenatal Risk Communication," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 48-58, January.
    4. Jie, Yun, 2020. "Responding to requests for help: Effects of payoff schemes with small monetary units," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Charles Changchuan Jiang & Liana Fraenkel, 2017. "The Influence of Varying Cost Formats on Preferences," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(1), pages 17-26, January.
    6. McDaniels, Timothy L. & Gregory, Robin & Arvai, Joseph & Chuenpagdee, Ratana, 2003. "Decision structuring to alleviate embedding in environmental valuation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-46, August.
    7. Peggy J. Liu & Kelly L. Haws & Karen Scherr & Joseph P. Redden & James R. Bettman & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2019. "The Primacy of “What” over “How Much”: How Type and Quantity Shape Healthiness Perceptions of Food Portions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3353-3381, July.
    8. Wardley, Marcus & Alberhasky, Max, 2021. "Framing zero: Why losing nothing is better than gaining nothing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Ch'ng, Kean Siang & Loke, Yiing Jia, 2010. "Inconsistency of fairness evaluation in simulated labot market," MPRA Paper 21527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Logg, Jennifer M. & Minson, Julia A. & Moore, Don A., 2019. "Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 90-103.
    11. Thomas Kourouxous & Thomas Bauer, 2019. "Violations of dominance in decision-making," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 209-239, April.
    12. Brice Mayag & Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2009. "A characterization of the 2-additive Choquet integral through cardinal information," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00445132, HAL.
    13. Newman, George E. & Jeremy Shen, Y., 2012. "The counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 973-983.
    14. Mao, Wen, 2016. "Sometimes “Fee” Is Better Than “Free”: Token Promotional Pricing and Consumer Reactions to Price Promotion Offering Product Upgrades," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 173-184.
    15. A. Peter McGraw & Eldar Shafir & Alexander Todorov, 2010. "Valuing Money and Things: Why a $20 Item Can Be Worth More and Less Than $20," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 816-830, May.
    16. Huber, Joel & Viscusi, W. Kip & Bell, Jason, 2008. "Reference dependence in iterative choices," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 143-152, July.
    17. Weber, Martin & Mueller-Dethard, Jan, 2020. "The Portfolio Composition Effect," CEPR Discussion Papers 15012, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Rodolfo Vázquez-Casielles & Víctor Iglesias & Concepción Varela-Neira, 2010. "Service recovery, satisfaction and behaviour intentions: analysis of compensation and social comparison communication strategies," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 83-103, July.
    19. John A. List, 2002. "Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The "More Is Less" Phenomenon," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1636-1643, December.
    20. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:425-434 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Shaffer, Victoria A. & Arkes, Hal R., 2009. "Preference reversals in evaluations of cash versus non-cash incentives," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 859-872, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:29:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s11213-016-9375-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.