IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v3y2022i1d10.1007_s43069-022-00126-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Design Continuum Between Group Technology and Fractal Cell Designs for Manufacturing Systems Through the Central Backup Cellular Manufacturing System

Author

Listed:
  • Salah Elaskari

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Uday Venkatadri

    (Dalhousie University)

Abstract

In this paper, we present and analyze a new layout arrangement that we call the central backup cellular manufacturing systems (CBCMS). The CBCMS organization is inspired by the concept of the remainder cell in group technology (GT) systems in which products that are not easily partitioned in the parts-machine incidence matrix are allocated to the remainder cell. It is also inspired by the fractal cell organization in which machine types are dispersed roughly equally through the fractal cells. The GT layout is known to be efficient if parts can be easily partitioned into distinct cells, making the remainder cell either unnecessary or small. The fractal layout, on the other hand, is flexible and robust against internal (machine breakdowns) and external disturbances (demand variations). The central question addressed in this paper is whether GT and fractal cell systems can be unified within a single conceptual framework. This paper shows how the CBCMS is the unification framework to explore the design continuum between the GT and fractal cell configurations. With the help of an example, it also shows how the multi-commodity network flow–based formulation for the multi-period cell formation problem (MPCFP; Venkatadri et al. in Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(1–4):175–187, 11) can be used as a springboard to generate a series of GT, fractal, or CBCMS layout designs for evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Salah Elaskari & Uday Venkatadri, 2022. "Understanding the Design Continuum Between Group Technology and Fractal Cell Designs for Manufacturing Systems Through the Central Backup Cellular Manufacturing System," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-37, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:3:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s43069-022-00126-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-022-00126-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-022-00126-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-022-00126-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dekkers, Rob, 2018. "Group technology: Amalgamation with design of organisational structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 262-277.
    2. Saif Benjaafar & Sunderesh S. Heragu & Shahrukh A. Irani, 2002. "Next Generation Factory Layouts: Research Challenges and Recent Progress," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 58-76, December.
    3. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung, 2007. "Multi-period planning and uncertainty issues in cellular manufacturing: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 281-309, February.
    4. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Hung Cheng, Chun, 2009. "The dynamic plant layout problem: Incorporating rolling horizons and forecast uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 165-177, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akash Tayal & Angappa Gunasekaran & Surya Prakash Singh & Rameshwar Dubey & Thanos Papadopoulos, 2017. "Formulating and solving sustainable stochastic dynamic facility layout problem: a key to sustainable operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 621-655, June.
    2. Vikrant Sharma & Sundeep Kumar & M. L. Meena, 2022. "Key criteria influencing cellular manufacturing system: a fuzzy AHP model," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 65-84, January.
    3. Dahlbeck, Mirko & Fischer, Anja & Fischer, Frank & Hungerländer, Philipp & Maier, Kerstin, 2023. "Exact approaches for the combined cell layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 530-546.
    4. Kuldeep Lamba & Ravi Kumar & Shraddha Mishra & Shubhangini Rajput, 2020. "Sustainable dynamic cellular facility layout: a solution approach using simulated annealing-based meta-heuristic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 5-26, July.
    5. Mehmet Burak Şenol & Ekrem Alper Murat, 2023. "A sequential solution heuristic for continuous facility layout problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 355-377, January.
    6. Grzegorz Bocewicz & Zbigniew Banaszak & Izabela Nielsen, 2019. "Multimodal processes prototyping subject to grid-like network and fuzzy operation time constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 561-585, February.
    7. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung, 2007. "Multi-period planning and uncertainty issues in cellular manufacturing: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 281-309, February.
    8. Albareda-Sambola, Maria & Fernández, Elena & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2011. "The facility location problem with Bernoulli demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 335-345, June.
    9. Guo, Daqiang & Li, Mingxing & Lyu, Zhongyuan & Kang, Kai & Wu, Wei & Zhong, Ray Y. & Huang, George Q., 2021. "Synchroperation in industry 4.0 manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Jose Joaquin del Pozo-Antúnez & Francisco Fernández-Navarro & Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Mariano Carbonero-Ruz, 2021. "The Machine-Part Cell Formation Problem with Non-Binary Values: A MILP Model and a Case of Study in the Accounting Profession," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Saifallah Benjaafar, 2002. "Modeling and Analysis of Congestion in the Design of Facility Layouts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 679-704, May.
    13. Mingxing Li & Ray Y. Zhong & Ting Qu & George Q. Huang, 2022. "Spatial–temporal out-of-order execution for advanced planning and scheduling in cyber-physical factories," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1355-1372, June.
    14. Ge, Zehui & Hu, Qiying & Goh, Chon-Huat & Zhao, Rui, 2021. "Action-dependent commitment in vertical collaborations: The effect of demand-creating innovations in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. Papaioannou, Grammatoula & Wilson, John M., 2010. "The evolution of cell formation problem methodologies based on recent studies (1997-2008): Review and directions for future research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 509-521, November.
    16. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung, 2006. "A note on "a hybrid genetic algorithm for the dynamic plant layout problem"," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 87-89, September.
    17. Safaei, Nima & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2009. "Integrated multi-period cell formation and subcontracting production planning in dynamic cellular manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 301-314, August.
    18. Werners, Brigitte & Wülfing, Thomas, 2010. "Robust optimization of internal transports at a parcel sorting center operated by Deutsche Post World Net," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 419-426, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:3:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s43069-022-00126-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.