IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v59y2007i5d10.1007_bf03371714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vorteile für Beschaffungsbeziehungen in Clustern? Eine vergleichende transaktionskostenanalytische Betrachtung

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Fussan

    (Georg-Simon-Ohm Fachhochschule Nürnberg übernommen)

  • Katja Klepper

    (Freien Universität Berlin und einer Tätigkeit bei McKinsey im Bereich „strategische Geschäftsentwicklung“ der Deutschen Bahn AG)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Netzwerksynergien werden oft als Vorteil regionaler Industriecluster genannt. Aber sind diese Synergien wirklich relevant genug, um Cluster als Unternehmensumgebung aktiv für die Optimierung von Beschaffungsstrukturen zu nutzen? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage werden Beschaffungsbeziehungen innerhalb von Industrienetzwerken (Clustern) und alternativ zwischen nicht netzwerkverbundenen Partnern diskutiert. Den vertragsökonomischen Aspekten dieser Fragestellung wird dabei durch Verwendung des Transaktionskostenansatzes Rechnung getragen. Die Ergebnisse der Betrachtung in Form einer Entscheidungsmatrix für Netzwerkbeschaffung wurden durch eine Unternehmensbefragung überprüft, in deren Folge ein Cluster-Lebenszyklusmodell für verschiedene Cluster- und Beschaffungsszenarien entwickelt werden konnte. Dabei zeigt sich, dass nur in zwei Lebenszyklusphasen die Beschaffungsorganisation innerhalb von Clustern gegenüber netzwerkexterner Zuliefererkontrahierung überlegen ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Fussan & Katja Klepper, 2007. "Vorteile für Beschaffungsbeziehungen in Clustern? Eine vergleichende transaktionskostenanalytische Betrachtung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 588-614, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:59:y:2007:i:5:d:10.1007_bf03371714
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03371714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03371714
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03371714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Maskell & Mark Lorenzen, 2003. "The Cluster as Market Organization," DRUID Working Papers 03-14, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    2. Wolfgang Burr, 2003. "Fundierung von Leistungstiefenentscheidungen auf der Basis modifizierter Transaktionskostenansätze," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 112-134, March.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E, 1993. "Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 453-486, April.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1981. "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1537-1568, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Bode & Ingo Däberitz & Juri Fionik, 2011. "Messung von Kooperationserfolg in Clustern," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(7), pages 662-688, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. García-Vega, María & Huergo, Elena, 2017. "Trust and technology transfers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 92-104.
    2. Marta Peris-Ortiz & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2010. "Organisational capabilities and transaction costs in the analysis of activities and their externalisation: implications for the service industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 4(2), pages 105-122, June.
    3. Marta Peris-Ortiz & Fernando Peris Bonet & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2011. "Vertical integration in production and services: development in transaction cost economics," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(1), pages 87-97, March.
    4. Alejandro Agafonow & Marybel Perez, 2023. "How A Social Enterprise Wanes: The Transaction Costs of Credible Commitments at Etsy.com," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 35(1), pages 83-107, January.
    5. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    6. Shi, Wei & Tang, Yinuo, 2015. "Cultural similarity as in-group favoritism: The impact of religious and ethnic similarities on alliance formation and announcement returns," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 32-46.
    7. Hamilton-Hart, Natasha & Stringer, Christina, 2016. "Upgrading and exploitation in the fishing industry: Contributions of value chain analysis," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 166-171.
    8. Bernholz, Peter, 1997. "Property rights, contracts, cyclical social preferences and the Coase theorem: A synthesis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 419-442, September.
    9. Tony Simons, 2002. "Behavioral Integrity: The Perceived Alignment Between Managers' Words and Deeds as a Research Focus," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 18-35, February.
    10. Ajzenman, Nicolás & Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Guriev, Sergei, 2022. "Exposure to transit migration: Public attitudes and entrepreneurship," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Wang, Chun-Ju & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2012. "Team member commitments and start-up competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 708-715.
    12. Stavros Ioannides, 1999. "Towards an Austrian Perspective on the Firm," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 77-97, January.
    13. Xiao Li & Jeffrey Ng & Walid Saffar, 2021. "Financial Reporting and Trade Credit: Evidence from Mandatory IFRS Adoption," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 96-128, March.
    14. Paul L. Robertson, 2006. "Transaction Costs, Trust, and the Structuring of Markets," Discussion Papers Series 342, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    15. Krug, B. & Hendrischke, H., 2006. "Framing China: Transformation and Institutional Change," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-025-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    16. Christian Harm, 2002. "Bank management between shareholders and regulators," SUERF Studies, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum, number 21 edited by Morten Balling, May.
    17. Choe, Chongwoo & Ishiguro, Shingo, 2008. "On the (Sub)optimality of Multi-tier Hierarchies: Coordination versus Motivation," MPRA Paper 13451, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Klein Woolthuis, R. & Nooteboom, B., 2002. "Trust and Formal Control in interorganizational Relationships," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-13-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Pevzner, Mikhail & Xie, Fei & Xin, Xiangang, 2015. "When firms talk, do investors listen? The role of trust in stock market reactions to corporate earnings announcements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 190-223.
    20. Daniel W. Bromley, 1982. "Land and Water Problems: An Institutional Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(5), pages 834-844.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    D23; D82;

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:59:y:2007:i:5:d:10.1007_bf03371714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.