IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v127y2022i6d10.1007_s11192-022-04390-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of qualitative methods on article citation: an international business research perspective

Author

Listed:
  • José Satsumi López-Morales

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT de Veracruz)

  • Héctor Francisco Salazar-Núñez

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT de Veracruz)

  • Claudia Guadalupe Zarrabal-Gutiérrez

    (Tecnológico Nacional de México/IT de Veracruz)

Abstract

Qualitative methods have traditionally been underused in international business, and their research potential in this area has not been widely investigated. The main objective of the present study is to determine whether the use of qualitative methods by authors is a predictor of the impact their articles have in terms of the citations received. The analysis is based on empirically-based articles published in the Journal of International Business between 2000 and 2020. A total of 925 articles were examined. A quantitative regression technique was used to test the model. The results indicated that articles in the field of international business tended to be cited more if they employed qualitative methods. This suggests an avenue by which international business researchers can increase the impact of their work. This study also demonstrates the relevance of the qualitative approach in international business and reveals the close relationship between citation rates and research methods. Also, is important to use titles that draw people´s attention and, in some cases, reduce the number of pages of their publications.

Suggested Citation

  • José Satsumi López-Morales & Héctor Francisco Salazar-Núñez & Claudia Guadalupe Zarrabal-Gutiérrez, 2022. "The impact of qualitative methods on article citation: an international business research perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3225-3236, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04390-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04390-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-022-04390-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-022-04390-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben‐Ami Lipetz, 1965. "Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 81-90, April.
    2. Andrew C Inkpen, 2001. "A Note on Ranking the International Business Journals," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 32(1), pages 193-196, March.
    3. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2018. "Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 7(1), pages 23-48, March.
    4. Dustin J. Bluhm & Wendy Harman & Thomas W. Lee & Terence R. Mitchell, 2011. "Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(8), pages 1866-1891, December.
    5. Vieira, E.S. & Gomes, J.A.N.F., 2010. "Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13.
    6. Confraria, Hugo & Mira Godinho, Manuel & Wang, Lili, 2017. "Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 265-279.
    7. Yves Doz, 2011. "Qualitative research for international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(5), pages 582-590, June.
    8. Peter W. Liesch & Lars Håkanson & Sara L. McGaughey & Stuart Middleton & Julia Cretchley, 2011. "The evolution of the international business field: a scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(1), pages 17-42, July.
    9. Fang Zhang & Shengli Wu, 2021. "Measuring academic entities’ impact by content-based citation analysis in a heterogeneous academic network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 7197-7222, August.
    10. Abrishami, Ali & Aliakbary, Sadegh, 2019. "Predicting citation counts based on deep neural network learning techniques," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 485-499.
    11. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Yixin Qiu & Noemi Sinkovics & Wolfgang Kürsten, 2021. "Qualitative research: extending the range with flexible pattern matching," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 251-273, February.
    12. Chao Lu & Ying Ding & Chengzhi Zhang, 2017. "Understanding the impact change of a highly cited article: a content-based citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 927-945, August.
    13. Pratima Bansal & Wendy K. Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02312197, HAL.
    14. Pratima Bansal & Wendy K. Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02276705, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sina Duensing & Martin C. Schleper & Christian Busse, 2023. "Wildlife trafficking as a societal supply chain risk: Removing the parasite without damaging the host?," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(2), pages 3-32, April.
    2. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "When Wrong Is Right: Leaving Room for Error in Innovation Measurement," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    4. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    5. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Sato, Ryoma & Yamada, Makoto & Kashima, Hisashi, 2022. "Poincare: Recommending Publication Venues via Treatment Effect Estimation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    7. Schlepphorst, Susanne & Welter, Friederike & Holz, Michael, 2022. "Die gesellschaftliche Wertschöpfung des Mittelstands," IfM-Materialien 292, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    8. Turienzo, Javier & Cabanelas, Pablo & Lampón, Jesús F., 2023. "Business models in times of disruption: The connected and autonomous vehicles (uncertain) domino effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. Marco Brand & Victor Tiberius & Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 157-187, January.
    10. Ming-Jer Chen, 2018. "Scholarship-practice “oneness” of an academic career: The entrepreneurial pursuit of an expansive view of management scholarship," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 859-886, December.
    11. Wanjun Xia & Tianrui Li & Chongshou Li, 2023. "A review of scientific impact prediction: tasks, features and methods," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 543-585, January.
    12. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan & Hoffmann, Petra & Kowalski, Rita, 2022. "The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 280-296.
    13. Wu, Juan & Wang, Daojuan & Morschett, Dirk, 2023. "Light Touch Goes Where? A Longitudinal Study of the Post-Acquisition Integration Paths Adopted by Chinese Multinational Enterprises," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    14. Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Thyholdt, Sverre Braathen, 2019. "Absorptive capacity and energy efficiency in manufacturing firms – An empirical analysis in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 978-990.
    15. Rebecca Hewett, 2023. "Dissonance, Reflection and Reframing: Unpacking the Black Box of Motivation Internalization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 285-312, March.
    16. Jennifer Brenton & Natalie Slawinski, 2023. "Collaborating for Community Regeneration: Facilitating Partnerships in, Through, and for Place," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 815-834, May.
    17. Päivi Luoma & Romana Rauter & Esko Penttinen & Anne Toppinen, 2023. "The value of data for environmental sustainability as perceived by the customers of a tissue‐paper supplier," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3110-3123, November.
    18. María-Ángeles Rastrollo-Horrillo & Julia Martín-Armario, 2019. "Organisational barriers to nascent born-global growth: Learning from the inside," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 454-473, September.
    19. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "Misfit? The Use of Metrics in Innovation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Elco Van Burg & Joep Cornelissen & Wouter Stam & Sarah Jack, 2022. "Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04390-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.