IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reihed/v62y2021i1d10.1007_s11162-019-09576-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Relationships: Insights from a Student Gratitude Model

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Muhammad Fazal-e-Hasan

    (Australian Catholic University)

  • Gary Mortimer

    (Queensland University of Technology)

  • Ian Lings

    (Queensland University of Technology)

  • Harjit Sekhon

    (Coventry University)

  • Kerry Howell

    (University of Tasmania)

Abstract

This paper develops a student relationship model which highlights the role of gratitude in impacting students’ positive perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions towards their higher education providers. Using theories from services marketing and positive psychology, we develop and test a gratitude relationship model. A field survey, employing existing measures, was used to elicit data from 1104 respondents of public, private, and semi-public Pakistani universities. The results of this current research empirically demonstrate the role of gratitude as a mediating mechanism that explains the impact of a university’s relationship investments on students’ positive perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. This study contributes to higher education and services marketing literature by examining the emergent role of gratitude in students’ perceptions of investments made by their universities and students’ positive emotions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions, such as involvement and long-term relationship intentions, respectively. This research encourages university decision-makers to implement relationship-building strategies beyond that of the purely economic, such as scholarships, that seek to enhance the emotion of gratitude, which will lead to higher levels of perceived value of the relationship, involvement, and intentions to build long-term relationships with the university. This is the first study that highlights the role of gratitude as having an impact on students’ perceptions, attitude, and behavioral intentions. Our student relationship model offers a better psychological explanation of how student gratitude may generate direct benefits for universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Muhammad Fazal-e-Hasan & Gary Mortimer & Ian Lings & Harjit Sekhon & Kerry Howell, 2021. "Managing Relationships: Insights from a Student Gratitude Model," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 62(1), pages 98-119, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:62:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11162-019-09576-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11162-019-09576-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11162-019-09576-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11162-019-09576-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce E. Hansen, 2000. "Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 575-604, May.
    2. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Wolfgang Ulaga & Andreas Eggert, 2006. "Relationship value and relationship quality: Broadening the nomological network of business-to-business relationships," Post-Print hal-00482522, HAL.
    4. Bagozzi, Richard P & Yi, Youjae, 1991. "Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 426-439, March.
    5. Mertens, Willem & Recker, Jan & Kummer, Tyge-F. & Kohlborn, Thomas & Viaene, Stijn, 2016. "Constructive deviance as a driver for performance in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 193-203.
    6. Andrea C. Morales, 2005. "Giving Firms an "E" for Effort: Consumer Responses to High-Effort Firms," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 806-812, March.
    7. Jeffrey Froh & Robert Emmons & Noel Card & Giacomo Bono & Jennifer Wilson, 2011. "Gratitude and the Reduced Costs of Materialism in Adolescents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 289-302, April.
    8. Cullen, John B. & Johnson, Jean L. & Sakano, Tomoaki, 2000. "Success through commitment and trust: the soft side of strategic alliance management," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 223-240.
    9. Fiona Cownie, 2017. "Gratitude and its drivers within higher education," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 290-308, July.
    10. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    11. Mohr, Lois A. & Bitner, Mary Jo, 1995. "The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 239-252, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan W. Buell & Michael I. Norton, 2011. "The Labor Illusion: How Operational Transparency Increases Perceived Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1564-1579, February.
    2. Namin Kim & EuiSik Cho & Youngchan Kim & Moonkyu Lee, 2009. "Developing an effective strategic mix of corporate philanthropy," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 1049-1062, May.
    3. Françoise Simon & Vesselina Tossan & Chantal Guesquière, 2015. "The relative impact of gratitude and transactional satisfaction on post-complaint consumer response," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 153-164, June.
    4. Söderlund, Magnus & Sagfossen, Sofie, 2017. "The consumer experience: The impact of supplier effort and consumer effort on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 219-229.
    5. Pierre Volle & Ahmed Anis Charfi, 2011. "Valeur perçue et comportements en ligne en état d'immersion : le rôle modérateur de l'implication et de l'expertise," Post-Print halshs-00638649, HAL.
    6. Chae, Heeju & Kim, Seunggwan & Lee, Jungguk & Park, Kyounghye, 2020. "Impact of product characteristics of limited edition shoes on perceived value, brand trust, and purchase intention; focused on the scarcity message frequency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 398-406.
    7. Berry, Christopher & Douglas Hoffman, K., 2023. "Communicating intent: Effects of employer-controlled tipping strategy disclosures on tip amount and firm evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Söderlund, Magnus, 2020. "Employee encouragement of self-disclosure in the service encounter and its impact on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Fazal e Hasan, Syed & Lings, Ian & Neale, Larry & Mortimer, Gary, 2014. "The role of customer gratitude in making relationship marketing investments successful," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 788-796.
    10. Söderlund, Magnus, 2018. "The proactive employee on the floor of the store and the impact on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 46-53.
    11. Matthews, Lynn & Eilert, Meike & Carlson, Les & Gentry, Jim, 2020. "When and how frontline service employee authenticity influences purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 111-123.
    12. Ramakrishna Salagrama & Sanjeev Prashar & T. Sai Vijay, 2021. "Do customers exhibit gratitude after service recovery? Understanding the moderating role of relationship type," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(4), pages 757-779, December.
    13. Bi, Qingqing, 2019. "Cultivating loyal customers through online customer communities: A psychological contract perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 34-44.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6813 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Vahid Rahmani, 2023. "Persuasion knowledge framework: Toward a comprehensive model of consumers’ persuasion knowledge," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 12-33, June.
    16. Ryan W. Buell & Ethan Porter & Michael I. Norton, 2013. "Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-034, Harvard Business School, revised Aug 2018.
    17. Langan, Ryan & Kumar, Anand, 2019. "Time versus money: The role of perceived effort in consumers' evaluation of corporate giving," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 295-305.
    18. Dao, Hung M. & Theotokis, Aristeidis, 2021. "Self-Service Technology Recovery: The Effect of Recovery Initiation and Locus of Responsibility," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 25-39.
    19. Mortimer, Gary & Fazal-e-Hasan, Syed Muhammad & Strebel, Judi, 2021. "Examining the consequences of customer-oriented deviance in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    20. K. Sudhir & Hortense Fong & Subroto Roy, 2019. "Greedy or Grateful? Asking for More when Thanking Donors," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2183R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Mar 2021.
    21. Sujay Dutta & Abhijit Guha & Abhijit Biswas & Dhruv Grewal, 2019. "Can attempts to delight customers with surprise gains boomerang? A test using low-price guarantees," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 417-437, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reihed:v:62:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11162-019-09576-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.