IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v50y2016i6d10.1007_s11135-015-0272-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A unique fuzzy multi-control approach for continuous quality improvement in a radio therapy department

Author

Listed:
  • A. Azadeh

    (University of Tehran)

  • M. Ameli

    (University of Tehran)

  • N. Alisoltani

    (University of Tehran)

  • S. Motevali Haghighi

    (University of Tehran
    Esfarayen University of Technology)

Abstract

In this study, a unique fuzzy multi-control approach for continuous quality improvement is introduced and is implemented in radio therapy department. Treatment process is one of the most important concern in healthcare department. To control this process there is a critical issue, because the periods that the patients take to the recovery should be controlled by the physicians. This study tries to control this process using the common statistical quality control methods. In addition, this paper presents a control index for patient condition. Given the decision making situations including diagnosis, determining the medicine and its value and control limit, decision making (DM) models will be used at first step. Then, process control is analyzed using statistical process control (SPC) including histogram, Pareto chart, cause and effect diagram and new fuzzy control chart. This research aims at presenting a unique control approach with fuzzy DM and SPC tools for a real radio therapy department. Moreover, these processes could be controlled and improved continuously using Deming cycle (PDCA). The case study verified and validated the design model. This is the first study that presents a unique integrated fuzzy control approach for improved decision-making process in an actual radio therapy department.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Azadeh & M. Ameli & N. Alisoltani & S. Motevali Haghighi, 2016. "A unique fuzzy multi-control approach for continuous quality improvement in a radio therapy department," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2469-2493, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:50:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-015-0272-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-015-0272-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-015-0272-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-015-0272-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Srinivasa Rao & Neelufur & K. Venkata Subbaiah, 2010. "Optimal operating policies of X-bar control chart for non-normal variables with generalised Pareto in-control times," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 91-111.
    2. Pi-Fang Hsu & Mei-Ghing Hsu, 2008. "Optimizing the Information Outsourcing Practices of Primary Care Medical Organizations Using Entropy and TOPSIS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 181-201, April.
    3. Mohamad-Ali Afsharkazemi & Jila Manouchehri & Mojtaba Salarifar & Amir Nasiripour, 2013. "Key factors affecting the hospital performance: a qualitative study using fuzzy logic," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3559-3573, October.
    4. Swagatika Mishra & Chitrasen Samantra & Saurav Datta & Siba Sankar Mahapatra, 2012. "Multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) for supplier selection using fuzzy linguistic modelling integrated with VIKOR method," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 67-89.
    5. Alireza Faraz & M. Moghadam, 2007. "Fuzzy Control Chart A Better Alternative for Shewhart Average Chart," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 375-385, June.
    6. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    7. Lai, Young-Jou & Liu, Ting-Yun & Hwang, Ching-Lai, 1994. "TOPSIS for MODM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 486-500, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Łatuszyńska Anna, 2014. "Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Topsis Method For Interval Data In Research Into The Level Of Information Society Development," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Yang Liu & Zhi-Ping Fan & Yan-Ping Jiang, 2018. "Satisfied surgeon–patient matching: a model-based method," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2871-2891, November.
    3. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Kazim Topuz & Ali Dag & Asil Oztekin, 2019. "An AHP-IFT Integrated Model for Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Web Sites," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1345-1355, December.
    4. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica & Antomil-Ibias, José, 2014. "Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-17.
    5. Emrah Önder & Nihat Taş & Ali Hepşen, 2014. "REITs in Turkey: Fundamentals vs. Market," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 4(1), pages 662-662.
    6. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    7. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    8. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    11. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    12. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    13. Seyed Rakhshan & Ali Kamyad & Sohrab Effati, 2015. "Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 505-525, March.
    14. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    15. Mónica García-Melón & Blanca Pérez-Gladish & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Paz Mendez-Rodriguez, 2016. "Assessing mutual funds’ corporate social responsibility: a multistakeholder-AHP based methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 475-503, September.
    16. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    17. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    18. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Cui, Ye & E, Hanyu & Pedrycz, Witold & Fayek, Aminah Robinson, 2022. "A granular multicriteria group decision making for renewable energy planning problems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1047-1059.
    20. Jha, Madan K. & Chowdary, V.M. & Kulkarni, Y. & Mal, B.C., 2014. "Rainwater harvesting planning using geospatial techniques and multicriteria decision analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 96-111.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:50:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-015-0272-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.