IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v16y2023i2d10.1007_s12063-022-00336-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain acceptance rate prediction in the resilient supply chain with hybrid system dynamics and machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Pardis Roozkhosh

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Alireza Pooya

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Renu Agarwal

    (University of Technology Sydney (UTS))

Abstract

In today’s era, the importance and implementation of blockchain networks have become feasible as it improves the resilience of the supply chain network at all levels by clarifying information and creating security in the network, improving the speed of response, and gaining the trust of customers. This paper aims to investigate the behavior of the blockchain acceptance rate (BAR) in the home appliances flexible supply chain in Iran using. system dynamics (SD), which is used to better define the relationships between the variables of the model that are non-linearly connected. Through simulating the behavior of the BAR in the long term in the supply chain, whilst conducting sensitivity analysis, policy design, and validation, this model will be implemented for the years 2020 to 2030. Additionally, post-simulation, blockchain acceptance behavior will be assessed by having simulated data considered as input for studied Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Vector Regression (SVR) (data that have the highest correlation with BAR). The acceptance rate behavior is predicted with the help of machine learning methods to have the best behavior and prediction for the data of 2020-2022 since the prediction function is compared to daily real data obtained these years. The results show that in 2030, the BAR will be around 0.6 if the COVID-19 outbreak impact is medium, and if the considered policy designs are implemented, this rate will reach a maximum of 0.8. So paying attention to the creation and design of policies can achieve positive implications for increasing the resilience of the supply chain in the long run. Findings suggest that the SD-MLP method is better than the SD-SVR method as it has less error and can predict the better behavior of the BAR.

Suggested Citation

  • Pardis Roozkhosh & Alireza Pooya & Renu Agarwal, 2023. "Blockchain acceptance rate prediction in the resilient supply chain with hybrid system dynamics and machine learning approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 705-725, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s12063-022-00336-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-022-00336-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-022-00336-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-022-00336-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    2. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2022. "Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Suryawanshi, Pravin & Dutta, Pankaj, 2022. "Optimization models for supply chains under risk, uncertainty, and resilience: A state-of-the-art review and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Min, Hokey, 2019. "Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 35-45.
    5. Naoum Tsolakis & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2018. "Mapping supply dynamics in renewable feedstock enabled industries: A systems theory perspective on ‘green’ pharmaceuticals," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 83-104, December.
    6. Kondoz, Mehmet & Kirikkaleli, Dervis & Athari, Seyed Alireza, 2021. "Time-frequency dependencies of financial and economic risks in South American countries," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 170-181.
    7. Sachin Kamble & Angappa Gunasekaran & Vikas Kumar & Amine Belhadi & Cyril Foropon, 2021. "A machine learning based approach for predicting blockchain adoption in supply chain," Post-Print hal-03539287, HAL.
    8. Shashi & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Myriam Ertz, 2020. "Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1215-1246, March.
    9. Sáenz, María Jesús & Revilla, Elena & Acero, Beatriz, 2018. "Aligning supply chain design for boosting resilience," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 443-452.
    10. Liu, Zugang & Nagurney, Anna, 2011. "Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 539-549, October.
    11. Kamble, Sachin S. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Kumar, Vikas & Belhadi, Amine & Foropon, Cyril, 2021. "A machine learning based approach for predicting blockchain adoption in supply Chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Arsalan Zahid Piprani & Noor Ismawati Jaafar & Suhana Mohezar Ali & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2022. "Multi-dimensional supply chain flexibility and supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain risks exposure," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 307-325, June.
    13. Benjamin R. Tukamuhabwa & Mark Stevenson & Jerry Busby & Marta Zorzini, 2015. "Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5592-5623, September.
    14. Seyed Alireza Athari, 2021. "Domestic political risk, global economic policy uncertainty, and banks’ profitability: evidence from Ukrainian banks," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 458-483, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Imran Zaman & Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Sahar Qabool & Himanshu Gupta, 2023. "How digitalization in banking improve service supply chain resilience of e-commerce sector? a technological adoption model approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 904-930, June.
    2. Sahebi, Iman Ghasemian & Mosayebi, Alireza & Masoomi, Behzad & Marandi, Fatemeh, 2022. "Modeling the enablers for blockchain technology adoption in renewable energy supply chain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Chih-Hung Hsu & Ming-Ge Li & Ting-Yi Zhang & An-Yuan Chang & Shu-Zhen Shangguan & Wan-Ling Liu, 2022. "Deploying Big Data Enablers to Strengthen Supply Chain Resilience to Mitigate Sustainable Risks Based on Integrated HOQ-MCDM Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-35, April.
    4. Ulpan Tokkozhina & Ana Lucia Martins & Joao C. Ferreira, 2023. "Uncovering dimensions of the impact of blockchain technology in supply chain management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 99-125, March.
    5. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    6. Zhang, Xi & Cheng, Yihang & Chen, Aoshuang & Lytras, Miltiadis & de Pablos, Patricia Ordóñez & Zhang, Renyu, 2022. "How rumors diffuse in the infodemic: Evidence from the healthy online social change in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Seyed Alireza Athari & Farid Irani, 2022. "Does the country’s political and economic risks trigger risk-taking behavior in the banking sector: a new insight from regional study," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Na Wang & Jingze Chen & Hongfeng Wang, 2023. "Resilient Supply Chain Optimization Considering Alternative Supplier Selection and Temporary Distribution Center Location," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-191.
    10. Yılmaz, Ömer Faruk & Yeni, Fatma Betül & Gürsoy Yılmaz, Beren & Özçelik, Gökhan, 2023. "An optimization-based methodology equipped with lean tools to strengthen medical supply chain resilience during a pandemic: A case study from Turkey," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Pythagoras N. Petratos & Alessio Faccia, 2023. "Fake news, misinformation, disinformation and supply chain risks and disruptions: risk management and resilience using blockchain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(2), pages 735-762, August.
    12. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Amir Mehdiabadi, 2022. "Integration of Blockchain Technology and Prioritization of Deployment Barriers in the Blood Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    13. James Whiteside & Samir Dani, 2020. "Influence of Organisational Culture on Supply Chain Resilience: A Power and Situational Strength Conceptual Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Zhao, Nanyang & Hong, Jiangtao & Lau, Kwok Hung, 2023. "Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    15. Vikash Sharma & Rakesh D. Raut & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Sunil Luthra & Ravindra Gokhale, 2021. "A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1191-1212, February.
    16. Jana, Rabin K. & Ghosh, Indranil & Wallin, Martin W., 2022. "Taming energy and electronic waste generation in bitcoin mining: Insights from Facebook prophet and deep neural network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    17. Rakshit, Sandip & Islam, Nazrul & Mondal, Sandeep & Paul, Tripti, 2022. "Influence of blockchain technology in SME internationalization: Evidence from high-tech SMEs in India," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Jung-Yu Lai & Juite Wang & Yi-Hsuan Chiu, 2021. "Evaluating blockchain technology for reducing supply chain risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1089-1111, December.
    19. Gupta, Somya & Ghardallou, Wafa & Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Sahu, Ganesh P., 2022. "Artificial intelligence adoption in the insurance industry: Evidence using the technology–organization–environment framework," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Lohmer, Jacob & Bugert, Niels & Lasch, Rainer, 2020. "Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s12063-022-00336-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.