IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v11y2018i1d10.1007_s12063-018-0129-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The moderating effect of management behavior for Lean and process improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel F. Assen

    (TIAS, School for Business and Society
    Tilburg University)

Abstract

It is commonly agreed that the success of Lean management is not only determined by its technical practices, but also by the so-called soft practices such as behavior and actions of employees and management. Lean Management behavior is in itself paradoxical in nature as it incorporates technical aspects (e.g., fact-based management, analysis and adhering to the standard operating procedures for sake of efficiency) and social, follower-related aspects (e.g., promotion of employee responsibility to continuously improve their work processes). In this paper, we investigate the (moderating) effect of some important Lean related management actions on the relationship between Lean and the level of process improvement: i) envisioning and communicating the meaning of Lean, ii) setting goals and active steering on improvement performance metrics and ii) encouraging continuous improvement. Survey data of 178 responses from Dutch organizations, shows that these management actions have a positive effect on both Lean and the level of process improvement. In addition, active steering on performance improvement has a reinforcing effect on the relationship between Lean and process improvement. For respondents with a low level of steering on performance improvement Lean does not lead to process improvement, while it does for respondents with average and high levels of steering on performance improvement. The more management operates on performance improvement, the more Lean will result in a higher level of process improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel F. Assen, 2018. "The moderating effect of management behavior for Lean and process improvement," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-018-0129-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-018-0129-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-018-0129-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-018-0129-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    2. Choi, Ty, 1995. "Conceptualizing continuous improvement: Implications for organizational change," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 607-624, December.
    3. Xiaowen Huang & Joseph C Rode & Roger G Schroeder, 2011. "Organizational structure and continuous improvement and learning: Moderating effects of cultural endorsement of participative leadership," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(9), pages 1103-1120, December.
    4. Naga Vamsi Krishna Jasti & Rambabu Kodali, 2015. "Lean production: literature review and trends," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 867-885, February.
    5. Torbjørn H. Netland, 2016. "Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2433-2448, April.
    6. Rahman, Shams-ur & Bullock, Philip, 2005. "Soft TQM, hard TQM, and organisational performance relationships: an empirical investigation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 73-83, February.
    7. Bortolotti, Thomas & Boscari, Stefania & Danese, Pamela, 2015. "Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 182-201.
    8. Ichniowski, Casey & Shaw, Kathryn & Prennushi, Giovanna, 1997. "The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(3), pages 291-313, June.
    9. Ng, Stephen C.H. & Rungtusanatham, Johnny M. & Zhao, Xiande & Lee, T.S., 2015. "Examining process management via the lens of exploitation and exploration: Reconceptualization and scale development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Wallace J. Hopp & Mark L. Spearman, 2004. "To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 133-148, August.
    11. Giuliano Almeida Marodin & Tarcisio Abreu Saurin, 2015. "Managing barriers to lean production implementation: context matters," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(13), pages 3947-3962, July.
    12. Sadao Sakakibara & Barbara B. Flynn & Roger G. Schroeder & William T. Morris, 1997. "The Impact of Just-in-Time Manufacturing and Its Infrastructure on Manufacturing Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(9), pages 1246-1257, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson & James Aitken & Cristovao Silva, 2020. "State-dependent service rates in make-to-order shops: an assessment by simulation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 70-84, June.
    2. Jie G. McCardle & Mary Beth Rousseau & Dennis Krumwiede, 2019. "The effects of strategic alignment and competitive priorities on operational performance: The role of cultural context," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 4-18, June.
    3. Gilles Galichet & Roberta Costa Affonso & Vincent Cheutet, 2022. "Processes-oriented maturity framework for Lean Manufacturing with health-at-work and performance management objectives," Post-Print hal-03878333, HAL.
    4. Antony Pearce & Dirk Pons & Thomas Neitzert, 2023. "Understanding Lean—Statistical Analysis of Perceptions and Self-Deception Regarding Lean Management," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-43, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hardcopf, Rick & Liu, Gensheng (Jason) & Shah, Rachna, 2021. "Lean production and operational performance: The influence of organizational culture," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Marodin, Giuliano & Frank, Alejandro Germán & Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Netland, Torbjørn, 2018. "Lean product development and lean manufacturing: Testing moderation effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 301-310.
    3. Renu Agarwal & Christopher Bajada & Paul James Brown & Roy Green, 2021. "People Management Practices that Underpin Lean Management Outcomes," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 75-94, June.
    4. Khurram Rehmani & Yasir Ahmad & Afshan Naseem & Tasweer Hussain Syed, 2020. "Do they really coexist? An empirical analysis of a conjoint implementation of Quality Management System and High Performance Work System on organizational effectiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. María Mojarro-Magaña & Jesús Everardo Olguín-Tiznado & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Claudia Camargo-Wilson & Juan Andrés López-Barreras & Rubén Jesús Pérez-López, 2018. "Impact of the Planning from the Kanban System on the Company’s Operating Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    7. Zu, Xingxing & Robbins, Tina L. & Fredendall, Lawrence D., 2010. "Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/Six Sigma practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 86-106, January.
    8. Escrig-Tena, Ana B. & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes & García-Juan, Beatriz & Beltrán-Martín, Inmaculada, 2018. "The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1-14.
    9. Malcolm J. Beynon & Margaret Heffernan & Aoife M. McDermott, 2012. "Psychological Contracts And Job Satisfaction: Clustering Analysis Using Evidential C‐Means And Comparison With Other Techniques," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 247-273, October.
    10. Ghobadian, Abby & Talavera, Irene & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Kumar, Vikas & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & O'Regan, Nicholas, 2020. "Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 457-468.
    11. Solaimani, Sam & Haghighi Talab, Ardalan & van der Rhee, Bo, 2019. "An integrative view on Lean innovation management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 109-120.
    12. Michael F. Gorman & Jayden Hoff & Robert Kinion, 2009. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Tales from the Front: Case Studies Indicate the Potential Pitfalls of Misapplication of Lean Improvement Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 540-548, December.
    13. Cho, Young Sik & Linderman, Kevin, 2019. "Metacognition-based process improvement practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 132-144.
    14. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2023. "The relationships between soft and hard factors of the Toyota way: a socio-technical perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 768-779, June.
    15. Jorge Iván Pérez-Rave & Rafael Fernández Guerrero & Andrés Salas Vallina & Favián González Echavarría, 2023. "A measurement model of dynamic capabilities of the continuous improvement project and its role in the renewal of the company’s products/services," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 126-140, March.
    16. van Assen, Marcel F., 2020. "Empowering leadership and contextual ambidexterity – The mediating role of committed leadership for continuous improvement," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 435-449.
    17. Roh, James & Hong, Paul & Min, Hokey, 2014. "Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: The case of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 198-210.
    18. Secchi, Raffaele & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2019. "Lean implementation failures: The role of organizational ambidexterity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 145-154.
    19. Cho, Young Sik & Jung, Joo Y. & Linderman, Kevin, 2017. "The QM evolution: Behavioral quality management as a firm’s strategic resource," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 233-249.
    20. Sunder M, Vijaya & Ganesh, L.S., 2021. "Lean additives in a service factory: A design science approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-018-0129-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.