IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i8d10.1007_s10845-020-01636-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy traceability: using domain knowledge information to estimate the followed route of process instances in non-exhaustive monitoring environments

Author

Listed:
  • Mateo Ramos-Merino

    (Universidade de Vigo, Escola de Enxeñaría de Telecomunicación)

  • Juan M. Santos-Gago

    (Universidade de Vigo, Escola de Enxeñaría de Telecomunicación)

  • Luis M. Álvarez-Sabucedo

    (Universidade de Vigo, Escola de Enxeñaría de Telecomunicación)

Abstract

In the frame of the process monitoring domain, traceability in environments with non-exhaustive event logs remains as a challenge. In these scenarios, the discovery of the route followed by a particular item along the entire process is a difficult task since it is not possible to access all the required pieces of information from processes under monitorization. To tackle this issue, the concept of fuzzy traceability is brought into the scene. The gist of the latter is to use contextual information derived from the domain of interest itself to infer the most probable route followed. To carry out this task, the proposed algorithm takes advantage of additional sources of machine readable information that describes in a more detailed manner the process models under study. This information is included in the process models using the advanced features supported by the BPMN-E2 (Business Process Model and Notation - Enhanced Expressiveness) specification, an extension of the well-known BPMN notation. In this way , it is possible to properly use as inputs: time restrictions of the activities included in the process; decision-making and monitoring points included; and the effects derived from the activities undergone. As a consequence, a probabilistic estimation of the route followed is generated by combining this information according to the presented algorithm. After the validation and simulation of the fuzzy traceability algorithm using real-world models, the results obtained are positive and show that, as the contextual information included grows, the route estimation gets more acurated. This high success rate suggests that the fuzzy traceability proposal is useful for the analysis of processes with poor quality of monitoring information, and outdoes the application of more conventional traceability techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateo Ramos-Merino & Juan M. Santos-Gago & Luis M. Álvarez-Sabucedo, 2021. "Fuzzy traceability: using domain knowledge information to estimate the followed route of process instances in non-exhaustive monitoring environments," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(8), pages 2235-2255, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01636-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01636-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01636-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01636-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakub Michal & David Březina & Dalibor Šafařík & Václav Kupčák & Andrea Sujová & Jitka Fialová, 2019. "Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Leonel Jorge Ribeiro Nunes & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias, 2019. "Technological Innovation in Biomass Energy for the Sustainable Growth of Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Juan Pablo Usuga Cadavid & Samir Lamouri & Bernard Grabot & Robert Pellerin & Arnaud Fortin, 2020. "Machine learning applied in production planning and control: a state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1531-1558, August.
    4. Vedpal Arya & S. G. Deshmukh & Naresh Bhatnagar, 2019. "Product quality in an inclusive manufacturing system: some considerations," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2871-2884, December.
    5. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    6. Julie A. Caswell & Neal H. Hooker, 1996. "HACCP as an International Trade Standard," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(3), pages 775-779.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Sebastian Mayer & Tobias Classen & Christian Endisch, 2021. "Modular production control using deep reinforcement learning: proximal policy optimization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(8), pages 2335-2351, December.
    3. Haiyun, Cui & Zhixiong, Huang & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Unnevehr, Laurian J. & Jensen, Helen H., 1999. "The economic implications of using HACCP as a food safety regulatory standard," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 625-635, December.
    5. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2019. "The Effects of Non‐tariff Measures on Agri‐food Trade: A Review and Meta‐analysis of Empirical Evidence," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 595-617, September.
    6. Mansoureh Maadi & Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi & Uwe Aickelin, 2021. "A Review on Human–AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-27, February.
    7. Masoud Zafarzadeh & Magnus Wiktorsson & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies for Data-Driven Production Logistics: Their Role from a Holistic and Value Creation Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, April.
    8. Radoslav Delina & Renata Olejarova & Petr Doucek, 2023. "Effect of a new potential supplier on business to business negotiations performance: evidence-based analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1941-1970, September.
    9. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Kyu Tae Park & Jinho Yang & Sang Do Noh, 2021. "VREDI: virtual representation for a digital twin application in a work-center-level asset administration shell," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 501-544, February.
    11. Leonel J.R. Nunes & Jorge T. Pereira da Costa & Radu Godina & João C.O. Matias & João P.S. Catalão, 2020. "A Logistics Management System for a Biomass-to-Energy Production Plant Storage Park," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Ortmann, Gerald F., 2000. "Promoting competitiveness in South African agriculture and agribusiness: The role of institutions," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-33, March.
    13. Lemstra, Mary Anny Moraes Silva & de Mesquita, Marco Aurélio, 2023. "Industry 4.0: a tertiary literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    14. Epperson, James E. & Estes, Edmund A., 1999. "Fruit And Vegetable Supply-Chain Management, Innovations, And Competitiveness: Cooperative Regional Research Project S-222," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 1-6, November.
    15. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S. Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2019. "Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 69-82.
    16. Ge, Shengbo & Foong, Shin Ying & Ma, Nyuk Ling & Liew, Rock Keey & Wan Mahari, Wan Adibah & Xia, Changlei & Yek, Peter Nai Yuh & Peng, Wanxi & Nam, Wai Lun & Lim, Xin Yi & Liew, Chin Mei & Chong, Chi , 2020. "Vacuum pyrolysis incorporating microwave heating and base mixture modification: An integrated approach to transform biowaste into eco-friendly bioenergy products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Mangelsdorf, Axel & Portugal-Perez, Alberto & Wilson, John S., 2012. "Food standards and exports: evidence for China," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 507-526, July.
    18. Guo, Daqiang & Li, Mingxing & Lyu, Zhongyuan & Kang, Kai & Wu, Wei & Zhong, Ray Y. & Huang, George Q., 2021. "Synchroperation in industry 4.0 manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    19. Chih-Hung Hsu & An-Yuan Chang & Ting-Yi Zhang & Wei-Da Lin & Wan-Ling Liu, 2021. "Deploying Resilience Enablers to Mitigate Risks in Sustainable Fashion Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Tan Ching Ng & Sie Yee Lau & Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi & Meng Suan Liang, 2022. "The Application of Industry 4.0 Technological Constituents for Sustainable Manufacturing: A Content-Centric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01636-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.