IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v31y2020i8d10.1007_s10845-020-01552-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-sided matching decision-making model with hesitant fuzzy preference information for configuring cloud manufacturing tasks and resources

Author

Listed:
  • Baodong Li

    (Chongqing University)

  • Yu Yang

    (Chongqing University)

  • Jiafu Su

    (Chongqing Technology and Business University)

  • Zhichao Liang

    (Chongqing University)

  • Sheng Wang

    (Chongqing University)

Abstract

Owing to the complexity of socio-economic environments and the fuzziness of human cognition, information of cognitive preference provided by decision-making organizations composed of many experts is often hesitant and fuzzy. In consequence, for the sake of addressing the hesitance and fuzziness of preference information for the configuration of tasks and resources in cloud manufacturing, a decision-making model of a two-sided matching considering a bidirectional projection under preference information of hesitant fuzzy is put forward. Primarily, this paper describes the problem of two-sided matching and introduces the hesitant fuzzy set. Afterwards, according to preference information given by matching agents using the hesitant fuzzy element, the evaluation matrix is constructed. Meanwhile, the bidirectional projection technology and TOPSIS method are combined to calculate the closeness degree matrix. Further, by introducing the constraint of the stable matching, a decision-making model of a two-sided matching for maximizing the closeness degree of two-sided matching agents is constructed, and the optimal configuration results are obtained by the solving of the model. Subsequently, the illustrative case is provided to validate the rationality and effectiveness of the presented model in solving the configuration for cloud manufacturing tasks and resources. Also, the stability in the proposed configuration results is illustrated by making a sensitivity analysis. Further, the reliability in the given solving process is demonstrated through performing a comparative analysis, as well as the advantages in the proposed model is also discussed. It shows that this developed model can give stable configuration results and also provide a matching approach for different agents under an uncertain environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Baodong Li & Yu Yang & Jiafu Su & Zhichao Liang & Sheng Wang, 2020. "Two-sided matching decision-making model with hesitant fuzzy preference information for configuring cloud manufacturing tasks and resources," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 2033-2047, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01552-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01552-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01552-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01552-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kushnir, Alexey, 2013. "Harmful signaling in matching markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 209-218.
    2. Hong Jin & Xifan Yao & Yong Chen, 2017. "Correlation-aware QoS modeling and manufacturing cloud service composition," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(8), pages 1947-1960, December.
    3. Lan, Jibin & Jin, Ruifang & Zheng, Zhaoyi & Hu, Mingming, 2017. "Priority degrees for hesitant fuzzy sets: Application to multiple attribute decision making," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 67-73.
    4. Yang-Kuei Lin & Chin Soon Chong, 2017. "Fast GA-based project scheduling for computing resources allocation in a cloud manufacturing system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1189-1201, June.
    5. Vicki Knoblauch, 2009. "Marriage matching and gender satisfaction," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(1), pages 15-27, January.
    6. Jie Jian & Yu Guo & Lin Jiang & Yanyan An & Jiafu Su, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Green Supply Chain Considering Environmental Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Archishman Chakraborty & Alessandro Citanna & Michael Ostrovsky, 2015. "Group stability in matching with interdependent values," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 19(1), pages 3-24, March.
    8. Jie Yang & Jiafu Su & Lijun Song, 2019. "Selection of Manufacturing Enterprise Innovation Design Project Based on Consumer’s Green Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Chakraborty, Archishman & Citanna, Alessandro & Ostrovsky, Michael, 2010. "Two-sided matching with interdependent values," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 85-105, January.
    10. Liwei Zhong & Yanqin Bai, 2018. "Equivalence of two-sided stable matching," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1380-1387, November.
    11. Ahn, Tom & Arcidiacono, Peter & Murphy, Alvin & Swinton, Omari, 2010. "Explaining cross-racial differences in teenage labor force participation: Results from a two-sided matching model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 201-211, May.
    12. Bikhchandani, Sushil, 2017. "Stability with one-sided incomplete information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 372-399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mei Cai & Suqiong Hu & Ya Wang & Jingmei Xiao, 2022. "A Dynamic Social Network Matching Model for Virtual Power Plants and Distributed Energy Resources with Probabilistic Linguistic Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-33, November.
    2. Li Xiong & Chengwen Wang & Zhaoran Xu, 2022. "Supply and demand matching model of P2P sharing accommodation platforms considering fairness," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 951-978, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alston, Max, 2020. "On the non-existence of stable matches with incomplete information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 336-344.
    2. Kloosterman, Andrew & Troyan, Peter, 2020. "School choice with asymmetric information: priority design and the curse of acceptance," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), July.
    3. Timm Opitz & Christoph Schwaiger, 2023. "Reciprocal Preferences in Matching Markets," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 388, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    4. Oğuz Afacan, Mustafa, 2012. "Group robust stability in matching markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 394-398.
    5. Asma Talhi & Virginie Fortineau & Jean-Charles Huet & Samir Lamouri, 2019. "Ontology for cloud manufacturing based Product Lifecycle Management," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 2171-2192, June.
    6. Fujinaka, Yuji & Miyakawa, Toshiji, 2020. "Ex-post incentive compatible and individually rational assignments in housing markets with interdependent values," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 157-164.
    7. Yankai Wang & Shilong Wang & Bo Yang & Bo Gao & Sibao Wang, 2022. "An effective adaptive adjustment method for service composition exception handling in cloud manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 735-751, March.
    8. Kawaguchi, Riho & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2019. "Decision-making with reference information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 519(C), pages 109-118.
    9. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Qingmin Liu & George J. Mailath & Andrew Postlewaite & Larry Samuelson, 2012. "Matching with Incomplete Information," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000551, David K. Levine.
    11. Emiliya Lazarova & Dinko Dimitrov, 2017. "Paths to stability in two-sided matching under uncertainty," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(1), pages 29-49, March.
    12. Jens Josephson & Joel Shapiro, 2008. "Interviews and adverse selection," Economics Working Papers 1093, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    13. Jiafu Su & Chi Li & Qingjun Zeng & Jiaquan Yang & Jie Zhang, 2019. "A Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism Based on Third-Party Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Shi, Fanqi, 2021. "Stability in sequential matching with incomplete information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 492-502.
    15. Shiyong Yin & Jinsong Bao & Jie Zhang & Jie Li & Junliang Wang & Xiaodi Huang, 2020. "Real-time task processing for spinning cyber-physical production systems based on edge computing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 2069-2087, December.
    16. Bikhchandani, Sushil, 2017. "Stability with one-sided incomplete information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 372-399.
    17. Marcelo Ariel Fernandez & Kirill Rudov & Leeat Yariv, 2022. "Centralized Matching with Incomplete Information," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 4(1), pages 18-33, March.
    18. Nandi, Sandip & Granata, Giuseppe & Jana, Subrata & Ghorui, Neha & Mondal, Sankar Prasad & Bhaumik, Moumita, 2023. "Evaluation of the treatment options for COVID-19 patients using generalized hesitant fuzzy- multi criteria decision making techniques," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Ortega, Josué, 2019. "The losses from integration in matching markets can be large," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 48-51.
    20. Hui Xu & Shuxiu Li & Yongtao Tan & Bin Xing, 2022. "Comprehensive Resilience Assessment of Complex Urban Public Spaces: A Perspective of Promoting Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:31:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01552-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.