IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v20y2019i6d10.1007_s10902-018-0025-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory Focus Profiles Among Chinese Pre-adolescents and Adolescents and Their Relationship to Personality and Psychological Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Hongrui Liu

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Meiling Yao

    (Beijing Normal University)

Abstract

Although regulatory focus has been found to be associated with various variables (e.g., personality, self-esteem, and life satisfaction), relatively little is known about how promotion focus and prevention focus, two forms of regulatory focus, operate within the individual and how combinations of these two foci work. In this research types of regulatory focus profiles as well as their associations with personality predictors and psychological consequences among Chinese preadolescents and adolescents were explored. Latent profile analyses identified four distinct regulatory focus profiles: high regulatory focus (18.7–41%), moderate regulatory focus (41.9–65%), low regulatory focus (4.3–10.3%), and primarily promotion-oriented (3.3–12.3%). Conscientiousness, openness, and neuroticism were consistently significant predictors of these profiles with (a) high conscientiousness and openness increasing probabilities of primarily promotion-oriented and high regulatory focus profiles, and (b) high neuroticism increasing the probability of a high regulatory focus profile. Multiple comparisons of the four profiles revealed differences in psychological outcomes; primarily promotion-oriented preadolescents and adolescents demonstrated the most adaptive pattern with the highest self-esteem, the lowest loneliness, and the highest life satisfaction. Moreover, the regulatory focus profile remained the significant predictor of life satisfaction even after controlling for the Big Five personality traits. Limitations and implications are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongrui Liu & Meiling Yao, 2019. "Regulatory Focus Profiles Among Chinese Pre-adolescents and Adolescents and Their Relationship to Personality and Psychological Outcomes," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 1807-1824, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:20:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10902-018-0025-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-018-0025-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-018-0025-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-018-0025-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Joshanloo & Samaneh Afshari, 2011. "Big Five Personality Traits and Self-Esteem as Predictors of Life Satisfaction in Iranian Muslim University Students," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 105-113, March.
    2. Brockner, Joel & Higgins, E. Tory, 2001. "Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 35-66, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhiqiang & Yan, Miao & Fan, Youqing & Chen, Liling, 2021. "Ascribed or achieved? The role of birth order on innovative behaviour in the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 480-492.
    2. Saeedeh Ahmadi & Saeed Khanagha & Luca Berchicci & Justin J. P. Jansen, 2017. "Are Managers Motivated to Explore in the Face of a New Technological Change? The Role of Regulatory Focus, Fit, and Complexity of Decision‐Making," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 209-237, March.
    3. Rui-Ping Zhang, 2016. "Positive Affect and Self-Efficacy as Mediators Between Personality and Life Satisfaction in Chinese College Freshmen," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 2007-2021, October.
    4. Gunnar Bergström & Klas Gustafsson & Emmanuel Aboagye & Staffan Marklund & Gunnar Aronsson & Christina Björklund & Constanze Leineweber, 2020. "A Resourceful Work Environment Moderates the Relationship between Presenteeism and Health. A Study Using Repeated Measures in the Swedish Working Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Sue-Chan, Christina & Au, Al K.C. & Hackett, Rick D., 2012. "Trust as a mediator of the relationship between leader/member behavior and leader-member-exchange quality," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 459-468.
    6. Don C. Zhang & Tyler L. Renshaw, 2020. "Personality and College Student Subjective Wellbeing: A Domain-Specific Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 997-1014, March.
    7. Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, 2007. "Emotion in Organizations: A Review in Stages," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt2bn0n9mv, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    8. Conrad Wiedeler & Nadine Kammerlander, 2021. "Learning the ropes of entrepreneurship: understanding internal corporate venturing for family firms from an entrepreneurial learning perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 669-703, April.
    9. Jacky C. K. Ng & Victor C. Y. Lau & Sylvia Xiahua Chen, 2020. "Why are Dispositional Enviers not Satisfied With Their Lives? An Investigation of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Pathways Among Adolescents and Young Adults," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 525-545, February.
    10. Dorine Maurice Mattar, 2021. "An Organizational Change With Quarantined Members," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    11. Cropanzano, Russell & Paddock, Layne & Rupp, Deborah E. & Bagger, Jessica & Baldwin, Amanda, 2008. "How regulatory focus impacts the process-by-outcome interaction for perceived fairness and emotions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 36-51, January.
    12. Seunghye Lee & Rami Jung, 2023. "You Say Tough, I Say Hope: An Effect of CEO Regulatory Focus on Corporate Social Performance under Challenging Market Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Oana Buliga & Christian W. Scheiner & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2016. "Business model innovation and organizational resilience: towards an integrated conceptual framework," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(6), pages 647-670, August.
    14. Warr, Peter & Bindl, Uta K. & Parker, Sharon K. & Inceoglu, Ilke, 2014. "Four-quadrant investigation of job-related affects and behaviours," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 53129, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Gretchen Spreitzer & Kathleen Sutcliffe & Jane Dutton & Scott Sonenshein & Adam M. Grant, 2005. "A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 537-549, October.
    16. Li, Andrew & Evans, Joel & Christian, Michael S. & Gilliland, Stephen W. & Kausel, Edgar E. & Stein, Jordan H., 2011. "The effects of managerial regulatory fit priming on reactions to explanations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 268-282, July.
    17. Yongquan Huo & Feng Kong, 2014. "Moderating Effects of Gender and Loneliness on the Relationship Between Self-esteem and Life Satisfaction in Chinese University Students," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 305-314, August.
    18. Roni Mash & Lihi Cohen, 2018. "Followers' Perception of Leadership Style, Organizational Commitment and Regulatory Focus, Moderated by Organizational Types," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 137-146.
    19. Johnson, Russell E. & King, Danielle D. & (Joanna) Lin, Szu-Han & Scott, Brent A. & Jackson Walker, Erin M. & Wang, Mo, 2017. "Regulatory focus trickle-down: How leader regulatory focus and behavior shape follower regulatory focus," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 29-45.
    20. Yannick Bammens & Paul Hünermund & Petra Andries, 2022. "Pursuing Gains or Avoiding Losses: The Contingent Effect of Transgenerational Intentions on Innovation Investments," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1493-1530, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:20:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10902-018-0025-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.