IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v24y2022i3d10.1007_s10796-022-10265-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Evaluation of a Conversational Agent for Facilitating Idea Generation in Organizational Innovation Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Mathis Poser

    (Universität Hamburg, Information Systems and Socio-Technical Design)

  • Gerrit C. Küstermann

    (Universität Hamburg, Information Systems and Socio-Technical Design)

  • Navid Tavanapour

    (Universität Hamburg, Information Systems and Socio-Technical Design)

  • Eva A. C. Bittner

    (Universität Hamburg, Information Systems and Socio-Technical Design)

Abstract

Large numbers of incomplete, unclear, and unspecific submissions on idea platforms hinder organizations to exploit the full potential of open innovation initiatives as idea selection is cumbersome. In a design science research project, we develop a design for a conversational agent (CA) based on artificial intelligence to facilitate contributors in generating elaborate ideas on idea platforms where human facilitation is not scalable. We derive prescriptive design knowledge in the form of design principles, instantiate, and evaluate the CA in two successive evaluation episodes. The design principles contribute to the current research stream on automated facilitation and can guide providers of idea platforms to enhance idea generation and subsequent idea selection processes. Results indicate that CA-based facilitation is engaging for contributors and yields well-structured and elaborated ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathis Poser & Gerrit C. Küstermann & Navid Tavanapour & Eva A. C. Bittner, 2022. "Design and Evaluation of a Conversational Agent for Facilitating Idea Generation in Organizational Innovation Processes," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 771-796, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:24:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-022-10265-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-022-10265-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-022-10265-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-022-10265-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashlee Humphreys & Rebecca Jen-Hui Wang & Eileen FischerEditor & Linda PriceAssociate Editor, 2018. "Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1274-1306.
    2. Valentina Lazzarotti & Raffaella Manzini, 2009. "Different Modes Of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework And An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 615-636.
    3. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    4. Laura J. Kornish & Jeremy Hutchison‐Krupat, 2017. "Research on Idea Generation and Selection: Implications for Management of Technology," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 633-651, April.
    5. Edona Elshan & Naim Zierau & Christian Engel & Andreas Janson & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2022. "Understanding the Design Elements Affecting User Acceptance of Intelligent Agents: Past, Present and Future," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 699-730, June.
    6. Geoffrey Barbier & Reza Zafarani & Huiji Gao & Gabriel Fung & Huan Liu, 2012. "Maximizing benefits from crowdsourced data," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 257-279, September.
    7. Triparna de Vreede & Cuong Nguyen & Gert-Jan de Vreede & Imed Boughzala & Onook Oh & Roni Reiter-Palmon, 2013. "A theoretical model of user engagement in crowdsourcing," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01244682, HAL.
    8. Miia Kosonen & Chunmei Gan & Heidi Olander & Kirsimarja Blomqvist, 2013. "My Idea Is Our Idea! Supporting User-Driven Innovation Activities In Crowdsourcing Communities," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-18.
    9. Jonathan R. Corney & Carmen Torres-Sanchez & A. Prasanna Jagadeesan & William C. Regli, 2009. "Outsourcing labour to the cloud," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 294-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Levesque & Cédric Dalmasso & Sophie Hooge, 2022. "Understanding the Impacts of Digital Transformation in the Service Industry: the Mutation of the Back-Office Function in the Insurance Sector," Post-Print hal-04068150, HAL.
    2. Babak Abedin & Christian Meske & Iris Junglas & Fethi Rabhi & Hamid R. Motahari-Nezhad, 2022. "Designing and Managing Human-AI Interactions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 691-697, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengsheng Xiao & Yi‐Chun (Chad) Ho & Hai Che, 2021. "Building the Momentum: Information Disclosure and Herding in Online Crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3213-3230, September.
    2. Windsperger, Josef, 2001. "The fee structure in franchising: a property rights view," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 219-226, November.
    3. Mahan, Joseph E. & Seo, Won Jae & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Funk, Daniel, 2015. "Exploring the impact of social networking sites on running involvement, running behavior, and social life satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-192.
    4. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    5. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    6. Nitin Walia & Mark Srite & Wendy Huddleston, 2016. "Eyeing the web interface: the influence of price, product, and personal involvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-333, September.
    7. Lori Rosenkopf & Paul Almeida, 2003. "Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 751-766, June.
    8. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    9. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    10. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    12. Rogerio S. Victer, 2020. "Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3232 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Alain Cohn & Tobias Gesche & Michel André Maréchal, 2022. "Honesty in the Digital Age," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 827-845, February.
    15. Peltokorpi, Vesa, 2015. "Corporate Language Proficiency and Reverse Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Corporations: Interactive Effects of Communication Media Richness and Commitment to Headquarters," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 49-62.
    16. Ahmed Hamdi & Tarik Saikouk & Bouchaib Bahli, 2020. "Facing supply chain disruptions: enhancers of supply chain resiliency," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2943-2958.
    17. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    18. repec:ipg:wpaper:40 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Aishwarya Narayan & Sumukh Hungund, 2022. "Enhancing Firm Performance Through Adoption of Innovation: an Empirical Evidence from Indian Biotechnological Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2431-2456, September.
    20. Anca Metiu, 2006. "Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 418-435, August.
    21. Starling David Hunter & Henrik Bentzen & Jan Taug, 2020. "On the “missing link” between formal organization and informal social structure," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    22. Sofia Patsali, 2019. "Opening the black box of university-suppliers' co-invention: some field study evidence," Working Papers of BETA 2019-46, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:24:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-022-10265-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.