IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fobric/v11y2017i1d10.1186_s11782-017-0015-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity absorption: a processual strategic approach to corporate entrepreneurship strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Haina Zhang

    (Lancaster University)

Abstract

In contrast to traditional strategic approaches that are based on complexity reduction, this paper aims to develop an alternative way of understanding entrepreneurial strategy and managing complexity from a processual perspective. The new perspective is developed from a processual perspective integrating insights from an understanding of complexity to engage with philosophical accounts of Chinese processual thought particularly as it is applied to entrepreneurial strategy. The new theoretical framework is empirically investigated through case studies of 30 entrepreneurial organizations in China. The findings confirm that timing and action, context/situation, and efficacy are the three key components in complexity absorption as preferred entrepreneurial strategic approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Haina Zhang, 2017. "Complexity absorption: a processual strategic approach to corporate entrepreneurship strategy," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fobric:v:11:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s11782-017-0015-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s11782-017-0015-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s11782-017-0015-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s11782-017-0015-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haina Zhang & Malcolm Cone & André Everett & Graham Elkin, 2011. "Aesthetic Leadership in Chinese Business: A Philosophical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 475-491, July.
    2. Max Boisot & John Child, 1999. "Organizations as Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: The Case of China," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 237-252, June.
    3. Mike W Peng & Denis Y L Wang & Yi Jiang, 2008. "An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(5), pages 920-936, July.
    4. Ralph D. Stacey, 1995. "The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(6), pages 477-495.
    5. Sonali K. Shah & Kevin G. Corley, 2006. "Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative–Qualitative Divide," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1821-1835, December.
    6. Giuseppe Labianca & Barbara Gray & Daniel J. Brass, 2000. "A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 235-257, April.
    7. Chen, Xiao-Ping, 2008. "Independent Thinking: A Path to Outstanding Scholarship," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(03), pages 337-348, November.
    8. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2002. "Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 249-273, June.
    9. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    10. Xiao-Ping Chen, 2008. "Independent Thinking: A Path to Outstanding Scholarship," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 4(3), pages 337-348, November.
    11. E.H.S. Andriesse & B.J. van Helvoirt, 2010. "Regional business systems and private sector development in Southeast Asia," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1-2), pages 19-36, April.
    12. Jeffrey S. Hornsby & Douglas W. Naffziger & Donald F. Kuratko & Ray V. Montagno, 1993. "An Interactive Model of the Corporate Entrepreneurship Process," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(2), pages 29-37, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fengbin Wang & Xue Zhang, 2020. "Microstructures and dynamic processes within the five-phase system: regarding COVID-19 as a complex system," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    2. Belén Casales Morici, 2022. "Strategic corporate entrepreneurship practices in financial services firms: the role of organizational factors," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Gaffney, Nolan & Cooper, Danielle & Kedia, Ben & Clampit, Jack, 2014. "Institutional transitions, global mindset, and EMNE internationalization," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 383-391.
    4. Marta Cecilia Jaramillo-Mejía & Dov Chernichovsky, 2015. "Información para la calidad del sistema de salud en Colombia: una propuesta de revisión basada en el modelo israelí," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, January.
    5. Faggini, Marisa & Parziale, Anna, 2011. "Fitness landscape and tax planning: NK model for fiscal federalism," MPRA Paper 33770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Almeida, Helena & Peñalver, Briones, 2013. "Organizational Well-being Factors. Determinants of Entrepreneurship in Small and Medium Companies of the Defense Sector," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 1(3), pages 162-178.
    7. Tan, Justin, 2007. "Phase transitions and emergence of entrepreneurship: The transformation of Chinese SOEs over time," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 77-96, January.
    8. Hong, Jacky F.L. & Snell, Robin Stanley & Easterby-Smith, Mark, 2006. "Cross-cultural influences on organizational learning in MNCS: The case of Japanese companies in China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 408-429, December.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5648 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Accard, Philippe, 2015. "Complex hierarchy: The strategic advantages of a trade-off between hierarchical supervision and self-organizing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 89-103.
    11. R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey G. Covin & Donald F. Kuratko, 2009. "Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 19-46, January.
    12. Weilei (Stone) Shi & Sunny Li Sun & Daying Yan & Zhu Zhu, 2017. "Institutional fragility and outward foreign direct investment from China," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(4), pages 452-476, May.
    13. Boris Urban, 2017. "Corporate Entrepreneurship In South Africa: The Role Of Organizational Factors And Entrepreneurial Alertness In Advancing Innovativeness," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Patrick M. Kreiser & Donald F. Kuratko & Jeffrey G. Covin & R. Duane Ireland & Jeffrey S. Hornsby, 2021. "Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: extending our knowledge boundaries through configuration theory," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 739-758, February.
    15. repec:ris:cieodp:2013_014 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. J. P. Coen Rigtering & M. Ayelen Behrens, 2021. "The Effect of Corporate — Start-Up Collaborations on Corporate Entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 2427-2454, November.
    17. Elia, Gianluca & Margherita, Alessandro, 2018. "Assessing the maturity of crowdventuring for corporate entrepreneurship," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 271-283.
    18. Wu Zhao & Wei Liu & Yun Chen, 2019. "Internal Fission Strategies in Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Lennart Burger & Ivana Blažková, 2020. "Internal Determinants Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 19-45.
    20. Luz E. Bohórquez Arévaloa & Angela Espinosa, 2015. "Theoretical approaches to managing complexity in organizations: A comparative analysis," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, January.
    21. Weismeier-Sammer, Daniela, 2011. "Entrepreneurial behavior in family firms: A replication study," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 128-138.
    22. Luís Marques & João J. Ferreira & Sascha Kraus & Raj Mahto, 2022. "Organizational Antecedents of Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Quantitative Investigation from Portugal," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(3), pages 483-513, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fobric:v:11:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1186_s11782-017-0015-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.