IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v19y2018i5d10.1007_s10198-017-0913-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ageing, health status and coverage rate effects on community prescription costs in Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Kenneally

    (University College Cork)

  • Brenda Lynch

    (University College Cork)

Abstract

Aims and objectives This paper aims to explore how GMS drug costs depend on age, gender, income, health status, community drug scheme coverage rates and whether they display significant differences across regions of Ireland. We also aim to find out whether the GMS drug costs of high and low income cohorts respond similarly to changes in their health status. The paper projects GMS drug costs in 2026 and examines the separate cost of population ageing and population growth over the period. We also aim to simulate the estimated model to show how much giving free prescription drugs to all persons aged ‘under 5’ would add to 2026 GMS drug costs, and also how much giving universal GMS coverage to all persons in 2026 would add to 2026 GMS drug costs. Methods We construct a multivariate logistic regression model of GMS community drug costs in Ireland. We progress the methodology used in earlier studies by explicitly modelling how regional incomes and regional health status interact in determining GMS drug costs in Ireland. An age cohort and region breakdown of the simulated GMS drug costs, of both projected demographic trends and public policy measures that have been adopted or are under consideration, are also investigated. Findings We find that GMS drug costs depend on age—but not gender—on income, health status, community drug scheme coverage rates, and they are significantly lower for all age cohorts in Donegal and the North West region. The GMS drug costs of high income cohorts tend to increase as their health status improves, whereas they tend to decrease as the health status of low income cohorts improves. A uniform 1% gain in health status has little impact on total GMS prescribing costs. Similarly, if the health status of all Irish regions improved to match that of the East region in 2010 it would only have reduced public prescription costs by around 32 € million of the 1.8 € billion GMS drugs bill. We find that giving free prescription drugs to all persons aged ‘under 5’ in 2010 would have only a minor impact on 2010 GMS drug costs, whereas giving universal GMS coverage to all persons would have doubled public prescription costs from 1.8 € billion to circa 3.6 € billion.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Kenneally & Brenda Lynch, 2018. "Ageing, health status and coverage rate effects on community prescription costs in Ireland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(5), pages 687-695, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:19:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-017-0913-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0913-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-017-0913-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-017-0913-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puig-Junoy, Jaume, 2004. "Incentives and pharmaceutical reimbursement reforms in Spain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 149-165, February.
    2. Lesley Tilson & Kathleen Bennett & Michael Barry, 2005. "The potential impact of implementing a system of generic substitution on the community drug schemes in Ireland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(3), pages 267-273, September.
    3. Giuseppe Carone & Christoph Schwierz & Ana Xavier, 2012. "Cost-containment policies in public pharmaceutical spending in the EU," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 461, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    4. Judith K. Hellerstein, 1998. "The Importance of the Physician in the Generic Versus Trade-Name Prescription Decision," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 29(1), pages 108-136, Spring.
    5. von der Schulenburg, J. -Matthias Graf, 1997. "Management of cost and utilization of pharmaceuticals in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(Supplemen), pages 45-53, September.
    6. Gorecki, Paul K. & Nolan, Anne & Brick, Aoife & Lyons, Seán, 2012. "Pharmaceuticals Delivery in Ireland. Getting a Bigger Bang for the Buck," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS24, June.
    7. Iván Moreno-Torres & Jaume Puig-Junoy & Josep Raya, 2011. "The impact of repeated cost containment policies on pharmaceutical expenditure: experience in Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(6), pages 563-573, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaiser, Ulrich & Mendez, Susan J. & Rønde, Thomas & Ullrich, Hannes, 2014. "Regulation of pharmaceutical prices: Evidence from a reference price reform in Denmark," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 174-187.
    2. Rajatheran Moodley & Fatima Suleman, 2019. "The impact of the single exit price policy on a basket of generic medicines in South Africa, using a time series analysis from 1999 to 2014," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Jaume Puig-Junoy & Santiago Rodríguez-Feijoó & Beatriz Lopez-Valcarcel, 2014. "Paying for Formerly Free Medicines in Spain After 1 Year of Co-Payment: Changes in the Number of Dispensed Prescriptions," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 279-287, June.
    4. Aida Isabel Tavares, 2017. "Generic substitution policy, an incentive approach," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 199-220, June.
    5. Kwon, Hye-Young & Bae, Seungjin & Choi, Sang-eun & Park, Sylvia & Lee, Eui-Kyung & Park, Sungmin & Kim, Jinhyun, 2019. "Easy cuts, easy rebound: Drug expenditures with massive price cuts in Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(4), pages 388-392.
    6. Birg, Laura, 2019. "Parallel imports and manufacturer rebates: Evidence from Germany," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 363, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    7. Brekke, Kurt R. & Konigbauer, Ingrid & Straume, Odd Rune, 2007. "Reference pricing of pharmaceuticals," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 613-642, May.
    8. Daniel Burkhard & Christian P. R. Schmid & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2019. "Financial incentives and physician prescription behavior: Evidence from dispensing regulations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(9), pages 1114-1129, September.
    9. Salas-Vega, Sebastian & Shearer, Emily & Mossialos, Elias, 2020. "Relationship between costs and clinical benefits of new cancer medicines in Australia, France, the UK, and the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    10. Folkert Groot & Stefano Capri & Jean-Claude Castanier & David Cunningham & Bruno Flamion & Mathias Flume & Harald Herholz & Lars-Åke Levin & Oriol Solà-Morales & Christoph J. Rupprecht & Natalie Shale, 2017. "Ethical Hurdles in the Prioritization of Oncology Care," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 119-126, April.
    11. repec:rre:publsh:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:89-103 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Khaled Bennour, 2007. "Advertising and Entry Deterrence: How the Size of the Market Matters," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 6(3), pages 199-206, December.
    13. Sabine Vogler & Valérie Paris & Alessandra Ferrario & Veronika J. Wirtz & Kees Joncheere & Peter Schneider & Hanne Bak Pedersen & Guillaume Dedet & Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, 2017. "How Can Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Improve Affordable Access to Medicines? Lessons Learned from European Countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 307-321, June.
    14. Frank, Richard G. & Zeckhauser, Richard J., 2007. "Custom-made versus ready-to-wear treatments: Behavioral propensities in physicians' choices," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1101-1127, December.
    15. Brekke, Kurt R. & Holmas, Tor Helge & Straume, Odd Rune, 2011. "Reference pricing, competition, and pharmaceutical expenditures: Theory and evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 624-638.
    16. A. ConwayLenihan & S. Ahern & S. Moore & J. Cronin & N. Woods, 2016. "Factors influencing the variation in GMS prescribing expenditure in Ireland," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    17. Han, Euna & Chae, Su-Mi & Kim, Nam-Soon & Park, Sylvia, 2015. "Effects of pharmaceutical cost containment policies on doctors’ prescribing behavior: Focus on antibiotics," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 1245-1254.
    18. Mujaheed Shaikh & Afschin Gandjour, 2019. "Pharmaceutical expenditure and gross domestic product: Evidence of simultaneous effects using a two‐step instrumental variables strategy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 101-122, January.
    19. David Granlund & Niklas Rudholm, 2012. "The Prescribing Physician’s Influence on Consumer Choice Between Medically Equivalent Pharmaceuticals," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(3), pages 207-222, November.
    20. Birg, Laura, 2018. "Parallel Imports and Manufacturer Rebates," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181646, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    21. Brekke, Kurt Richard & Holmås, Tor Helge & Straume, Odd Rune, 2013. "Margins and market shares: Pharmacy incentives for generic substitution," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 116-131.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public drug costs; Ireland; Demographics; Health status; Coverage rates; Public policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:19:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10198-017-0913-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.