IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i5d10.1007_s10668-021-01711-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking measures to improve the sustainability of Mediterranean ports based on multicriteria decision analysis: a case study of Souda port, Chania, Crete

Author

Listed:
  • I. Argyriou

    (Technical University of Crete)

  • N. Sifakis

    (Technical University of Crete)

  • T. Tsoutsos

    (Technical University of Crete)

Abstract

The depletion of natural resources and the increase in the complexity of environmental, economic, and development topics have led to ongoing international interest in modifying the current policies on climate change mitigation. Port administrators have started integrating environmental agendas into their daily management strategies, creating new port development challenges. The complexity of energy and environmental systems, in conjunction with the severe consequences of anthropogenic actions globally, renders it necessary to employ decision-making strategies developed with models that integrate various criteria and functionally contain all stakeholder considerations. These criteria include optimising the use of available resources, minimising environmental impacts, reducing overall costs, enhancing operational safety, and meeting energy needs. Through the implementation of multicriteria analysis, this study identifies and discusses the social acceptance variables of involved stakeholders for a Cretan port as an example for other ports and develops a theoretical model aiming to identify and prioritise appropriate technological and nontechnological solutions based on the priorities of the involved parties. The answers from 50 respondents, covering a wide variety of port operations, were examined and reviewed using multicriteria analysis. The results indicated that environmental pollution was the highest priority (average weight 9.1), followed by staff/infrastructure security (average weight 8.6) and energy consumption (average weight 8.3). Taking into consideration implementation costs and time, the use of smart grids (Phi = 0.221), as well as training employees (Phi = 0.22), received the highest score.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Argyriou & N. Sifakis & T. Tsoutsos, 2022. "Ranking measures to improve the sustainability of Mediterranean ports based on multicriteria decision analysis: a case study of Souda port, Chania, Crete," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6449-6466, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01711-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01711-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01711-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01711-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    2. Magali Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2004. "Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 209-222, July.
    3. Sorrell, Steve, 2015. "Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 74-82.
    4. Panahi, Roozbeh & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Pang, Jiayi, 2020. "Climate change adaptation in the port industry: A complex of lingering research gaps and uncertainties," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 10-29.
    5. Dalwon Kang & Sihyun Kim, 2017. "Conceptual Model Development of Sustainability Practices: The Case of Port Operations for Collaboration and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Maryam Bagherikahvarin & Yves Smet, 2017. "Determining new possible weight values in PROMETHEE: a procedure based on data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(5), pages 484-495, May.
    7. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 25-40.
    8. Daniel Seong-Hyeok Moon & Jong Kyun Woo, 2014. "The impact of port operations on efficient ship operation from both economic and environmental perspectives," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 444-461, September.
    9. Tsoutsos, Theocharis & Drandaki, Maria & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Iosifidis, Eleftherios & Kiosses, Ioannis, 2009. "Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1587-1600, May.
    10. Qiu, Wanfei & Jones, Peter J.S., 2013. "The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 182-190.
    11. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Li, Kevin X., 2019. "Green port marketing for sustainable growth and development," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 73-81.
    12. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2019. "Management Control Systems in port waste management: Evidence from Italy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 127-135.
    13. Diakaki, Christina & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Kolokotsa, Dionyssia, 2013. "Performance study of a multi-objective mathematical programming modelling approach for energy decision-making in buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 534-542.
    14. SangHyun Cheon, 2017. "The Economic–Social Performance Relationships of Ports: Roles of Stakeholders and Organizational Tension," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 50-62, January.
    15. Foster, Edward & Contestabile, Marcello & Blazquez, Jorge & Manzano, Baltasar & Workman, Mark & Shah, Nilay, 2017. "The unstudied barriers to widespread renewable energy deployment: Fossil fuel price responses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 258-264.
    16. Maurice Jansen & Rob van Tulder & Rikky Afrianto, 2018. "Exploring the conditions for inclusive port development: the case of Indonesia," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 924-943, October.
    17. Seguí, Xavier & Puig, Martí & Quintieri, Eugenio & Wooldridge, Chris & Darbra, Rosa Mari, 2016. "New environmental performance baseline for inland ports: A benchmark for the European inland port sector," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 29-40.
    18. Veronica, Scuotto & Alexeis, Garcia-Perez & Valentina, Cillo & Elisa, Giacosa, 2020. "Do stakeholder capabilities promote sustainable business innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 131-141.
    19. Wamsler, Christine, 2017. "Stakeholder involvement in strategic adaptation planning: Transdisciplinarity and co-production at stake?," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 148-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    3. Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Auer, Hans, 2022. "Demystifying natural gas distribution grid decommissioning: An open-source approach to local deep decarbonization of urban neighborhoods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    4. Magali Geerts & Michaël Dooms, 2020. "Sustainability Reporting for Inland Port Managing Bodies: A Stakeholder-Based View on Materiality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Michael Stein & Michele Acciaro, 2020. "Value Creation through Corporate Sustainability in the Port Sector: A Structured Literature Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Badreya Gharib Khamis Mohammed Alblooshi & Syed Zamberi Ahmad & Matloub Hussain & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2022. "Sustainable management of electronic waste: Empirical evidences from a stakeholders' perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1856-1874, May.
    7. Bin Meng & Haibo Kuang & Erxuan Niu & Jing Li & Zhenhui Li, 2020. "Research on the Transformation Path of the Green Intelligent Port: Outlining the Perspective of the Evolutionary Game “Government–Port–Third-Party Organization”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Anas S. Alamoush & Fabio Ballini & Aykut I. Ölçer, 2021. "Revisiting port sustainability as a foundation for the implementation of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs)," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-40, December.
    9. Theodore Styliadis & Jason Angelopoulos & Panagiota Leonardou & Petros Pallis, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Assessment and Measurement of Port Externalities: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Paths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Chun-Yu Lin & Gui-Lin Dai & Su Wang & Xiu-Mei Fu, 2022. "The Evolution of Green Port Research: A Knowledge Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Eduardo Batalha & Shu-Ling Chen & Hilary Pateman & Wei Zhang, 2023. "Defining a Social Role for Ports: Managers’ Perspectives on Whats and Whys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Gang Dong & Jing Zhu & Jin Li & Handong Wang & Yuvraj Gajpal, 2019. "Evaluating the Environmental Performance and Operational Efficiency of Container Ports: An Application to the Maritime Silk Road," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    15. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    17. Nigel Martin & John Rice, 2010. "Analysing emission intensive firms as regulatory stakeholders: a role for adaptable business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 64-75, January.
    18. Gao, Shuai & Cai, Wenjia & Liu, Wenling & Wang, Can & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2014. "Corporate Preferences for Domestic Policy Instruments under a Sectoral Market Mechanism: A Case Study of Shanxi Province in China," Working Papers 249496, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    19. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Liu, X.G. & He, C. & He, C.C. & Chen, J.J. & Zhang, B.J. & Chen, Q.L., 2017. "A new retrofit approach to the absorption-stabilization process for improving energy efficiency in refineries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1131-1145.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01711-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.