IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8072-d421999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Transformation Path of the Green Intelligent Port: Outlining the Perspective of the Evolutionary Game “Government–Port–Third-Party Organization”

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Meng

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Haibo Kuang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Erxuan Niu

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Jing Li

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Zhenhui Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China)

Abstract

While promoting the global economy and trade, ports impose serious pollution on the global ocean and atmosphere. Therefore, the development of ports is restrained by the policies and measures of governments and international organizations used to cope with climate change and environmental protection. With the development of information technology, the operation and expansion of ports is facing forms of green and intelligent reform. This research aims to link the development of green intelligent ports, government policies, and third-party organizations to find the most suitable evolutionary path for the development of green intelligent ports. This paper assumes that governments will push ports to transform into green intelligent ports from the perspective of benefiting long-term interests, that the goal of ports is to maximize their profits, and that third-party organizations will actively promote the development of green intelligent ports. Based on these assumptions, this paper has established an evolutionary game theory model of “government–port–third-party organization” regarding the development of green intelligent ports. The Jacobian matrix of the game theory system was constructed by using the replicator dynamic equation, and local stability analysis was performed to obtain the equilibrium stability point of the entire system. This research reveals the limitations of the development of green intelligent ports without government involvement and explores the ability of third-party organizations to promote the implementation of policies, confirming the role of government regulation and control in promoting the development of green intelligent ports. This paper may be helpful for the development of green intelligent ports in the future. The results show that: (1) The main factors affecting the choice of port strategy are the benefits of building a green intelligent port, the intensity of government regulation, and the quantitative influence of third-party evaluation results on the port strategy selection. (2) Government decision-making plays an important role in port transformation. If the relevant government chooses the wrong strategy, then the transformation of the port will be delayed. (3) Government regulation and control need to change with the change of the evolution stage. (4) Compared with the macro-control policies of the government, the influence of the third-party organization on the port is significantly smaller.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Meng & Haibo Kuang & Erxuan Niu & Jing Li & Zhenhui Li, 2020. "Research on the Transformation Path of the Green Intelligent Port: Outlining the Perspective of the Evolutionary Game “Government–Port–Third-Party Organization”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8072-:d:421999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8072/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8072/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xi, Xuan & Zhang, Jixiang, 2020. "Complexity analysis of a decision-making game concerning governments and heterogeneous agricultural enterprises with bounded rationality," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Csercsik, Dávid & Hubert, Franz & Sziklai, Balázs R. & Kóczy, László Á., 2019. "Modeling transfer profits as externalities in a cooperative game-theoretic model of natural gas networks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 355-365.
    3. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Li, Kevin X., 2019. "Green port marketing for sustainable growth and development," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 73-81.
    4. Yang, Yi-Chih & Chen, Shu-Ling, 2016. "Determinants of global logistics hub ports: Comparison of the port development policies of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 179-189.
    5. Winai Homsombat & Tsz Leung Yip & Hangjun Yang & Xiaowen Fu, 2013. "Regional cooperation and management of port pollution," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 451-466, September.
    6. Isam Kaysi & Nabil Nehme, 2016. "Optimal investment strategy in a container terminal: A game theoretic approach," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(3), pages 250-263, September.
    7. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Theo Notteboom, 2014. "The Greening of Ports: A Comparison of Port Management Tools Used by Leading Ports in Asia and Europe," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 169-189, March.
    8. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2016. "Port economic cost functions: A service perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    10. Seguí, Xavier & Puig, Martí & Quintieri, Eugenio & Wooldridge, Chris & Darbra, Rosa Mari, 2016. "New environmental performance baseline for inland ports: A benchmark for the European inland port sector," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 29-40.
    11. Daamen, Tom A. & Vries, Isabelle, 2013. "Governing the European port–city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 4-13.
    12. Lee, Taehwee & Yeo, Gi-Tae & Thai, Vinh V., 2014. "Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 82-88.
    13. Michele Acciaro & Thierry Vanelslander & Christa Sys & Claudio Ferrari & Athena Roumboutsos & Genevieve Giuliano & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Seraphim Kapros, 2014. "Environmental sustainability in seaports: a framework for successful innovation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 480-500, September.
    14. Woo, Jong-Kyun & Moon, Daniel S.H. & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2018. "The impact of environmental policy on ports and the associated economic opportunities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 234-242.
    15. Song, Dong-Ping & Lyons, Andrew & Li, Dong & Sharifi, Hossein, 2016. "Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 75-96.
    16. Naima Saeed & Odd I Larsen, 2010. "Container terminal concessions: A game theory application to the case of the ports of Pakistan," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 12(3), pages 237-262, September.
    17. Tseng, Po-Hsing & Pilcher, Nick, 2019. "Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 127-137.
    18. Na Zhang & Xiangxiang Zhang & Yingjie Yang, 2019. "The Behavior Mechanism of the Urban Joint Distribution Alliance under Government Supervision from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo-Ya Gan & Hsuan-Shih Lee & Yu-Jwo Tao & Chang-Shu Tu, 2021. "Selecting Suitable, Green Port Crane Equipment for International Commercial Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Lin Feng & Xinmiao Wang & Mengru Qu, 2022. "The Cooperative Game Study of Chinese Overseas Direct Investment in the Construction of Green Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Xiaorui Guo & Lifeng Wu & Meng Wang, 2022. "Application of Grey Lotka-Volterra Model in Water-Economy-Industry-Technology Innovation System in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Longzhen Yu & Jianhua Zhu & Zhixian Wang, 2021. "Green Taxation Promotes the Intelligent Transformation of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises: Tax Leverage Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Yijing Zou & Dayi He & Rui Sun, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Risk in Third-Party Environmental Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chandra Prakash Garg & Vishal Kashav & Xuemuge Wang, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability factors of green ports in China under fuzzy environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7795-7821, August.
    2. Michael Stein & Michele Acciaro, 2020. "Value Creation through Corporate Sustainability in the Port Sector: A Structured Literature Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Alvino, Federico, 2018. "Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 229-240.
    4. Assunta Di Vaio & Luisa Varriale, 2018. "Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-35, March.
    5. Anas S. Alamoush & Dimitrios Dalaklis & Fabio Ballini & Aykut I. Ölcer, 2023. "Consolidating Port Decarbonisation Implementation: Concept, Pathways, Barriers, Solutions, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
    6. Theo Notteboom & Larissa van der Lugt & Niels van Saase & Steve Sel & Kris Neyens, 2020. "The Role of Seaports in Green Supply Chain Management: Initiatives, Attitudes, and Perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Jin, Lianjie & Chen, Jing & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Zhou, Huixin & Jian, Yanchun & Yu, Bin, 2022. "Impacts of national strategies on gateway ports: An empirical study in the Bohai Rim," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 170-182.
    9. (Kevin) Park, Hyosoo & Chang, Young-Tae & Zou, Bo, 2018. "Emission control under private port operator duopoly," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 40-65.
    10. Izabela Kotowska & Marta Mańkowska & Michał Pluciński, 2018. "Inland Shipping to Serve the Hinterland: The Challenge for Seaport Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Tseng, Po-Hsing & Pilcher, Nick, 2019. "Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 127-137.
    12. Chun-Yu Lin & Gui-Lin Dai & Su Wang & Xiu-Mei Fu, 2022. "The Evolution of Green Port Research: A Knowledge Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    14. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Hanyu Lu & Lufei Huang, 2021. "Optimization of Shore Power Deployment in Green Ports Considering Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Claudia Durán & Fredi Palominos & Raúl Carrasco & Eduardo Carrillo, 2021. "Influence of Strategic Interrelationships and Decision-Making in Chilean Port Networks on Their Degree of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Sun, Jiasen & Yuan, Yang & Yang, Rui & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2017. "Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-86.
    19. Theo Notteboom & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2018. "The Greening of Terminal Concessions in Seaports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Yunesky Masip Macía & Pablo Rodríguez Machuca & Angel Alexander Rodríguez Soto & Roberto Carmona Campos, 2021. "Green Hydrogen Value Chain in the Sustainability for Port Operations: Case Study in the Region of Valparaiso, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8072-:d:421999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.