IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/apjors/v3y2019i1d10.1007_s41685-018-0084-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Site suitability analysis of biogas digester plant for municipal waste using GIS and multi-criteria analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Afsana Akther

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Tofael Ahamed

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Ryozo Noguchi

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Takuma Genkawa

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Tomohiro Takigawa

    (University of Tsukuba)

Abstract

Solid waste management of urban areas becomes complex to solve. Practically, macro and micro levels geospatial solutions are needed to solve waste management problem in the fastest growing major cities around the world. Dhaka is the capital city of Bangladesh having 16 million of population, expected to reach 20 million by 2020. Due to uncontrolled population, urbanization, industrialization and migration of people, a large amount of waste is generated every day in the city area. Suitable site selection for a biogas digester using anaerobic digestion of municipal organic waste could be a solution for Dhaka City waste management. This study describes the site suitability analysis for the installation of an anaerobic digester for waste management as a potentially effective option for the production of energy from organic waste in Dhaka City. To select the most suitable sites for the biogas digester, a multi-criteria analysis was performed with integration of the geographical information system (GIS) in a zone of Dhaka. To locate suitable sites, three sets of factors, environmental, social and safety, and economics were considered in an analysis using 11 criteria. The criteria were settlement or residence distance, sensitive site distance, river distance, major road distance, local road distance, agricultural land distance, slope, present land use, future urban growth, low land distance, land cost and electrical pole distance. Each criterion was evaluated using a pairwise comparison matrix. The criteria were reclassified in five levels (most suitable, suitable, moderately suitable, less suitable, and not suitable) using spatial analysis in the ArcGIS® environment. The reclassified features were further analyzed using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process. This analysis indicated that 1 most suitable, 6 suitable and 3 moderately suitable sites could be used for a biogas digester plant in the study area. Furthermore, the potential energy production was calculated based on per capita generated organic waste and population growth. The projected simulation results show the energy potential from 2015 to 2025 for methane (CH4). The proposed most suitable site could be able to generate 26–40 MW of electricity from zone 2 of Dhaka City annually. The research proposed a micro-level solution for biodigester sitting location in 1 zone of Dhaka City for anaerobic digestion to utilize waste as energy. The similar approach can be taken for the rest of 10 zones by identifying the most suitable location for sitting biodigester plants to convert waste to energy. GIS plays a vital role in selecting the best place in the capital city. The methodology proposed in this research was very much practical to identify the best sites in one zone of Dhaka City. Therefore, the developed methodology for siting biogas digester can be implemented for other cities, which are overburdened with large generated waste due to a fast growing population.

Suggested Citation

  • Afsana Akther & Tofael Ahamed & Ryozo Noguchi & Takuma Genkawa & Tomohiro Takigawa, 2019. "Site suitability analysis of biogas digester plant for municipal waste using GIS and multi-criteria analysis," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 61-93, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:3:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s41685-018-0084-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s41685-018-0084-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41685-018-0084-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41685-018-0084-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur, Richard & Baidoo, Martina Francisca & Antwi, Edward, 2011. "Biogas as a potential renewable energy source: A Ghanaian case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1510-1516.
    2. Erkut, Erhan & Moran, Stephen R., 1991. "Locating obnoxious facilities in the public sector: An application of the analytic hierarchy process to municipal landfill siting decisions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 89-102.
    3. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    4. Stephen K. Swallow & James J. Opaluch & Thomas F. Weaver, 1992. "Siting Noxious Facilities: An Approach That Integrates Technical, Economic, and Political Considerations," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(3), pages 283-301.
    5. Rao, P. Venkateswara & Baral, Saroj S. & Dey, Ranjan & Mutnuri, Srikanth, 2010. "Biogas generation potential by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 2086-2094, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sultana Sharmin & Helmut Yabar & Delmaria Richards, 2023. "Green Energy Optimization in Dinajpur, Bangladesh: A Path to Net Neutrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Majid Ebrahimi & Hamid Nejadsoleymani & Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, 2019. "Land suitability map and ecological carrying capacity for the recognition of touristic zones in the Kalat region, Iran: a multi-criteria analysis based on AHP and GIS," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 697-718, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasar, Abdullah & Nazir, Saba & Rasheed, Rizwan & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Nazar, Masooma, 2017. "Economic review of different designs of biogas plants at household level in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 221-229.
    2. Min, Hokey & Melachrinoudis, Emanuel, 1999. "The relocation of a hybrid manufacturing/distribution facility from supply chain perspectives: a case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 75-85, February.
    3. Bundhoo, Zumar M.A. & Mauthoor, Sumayya & Mohee, Romeela, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from biomass and waste materials in the Small Island Developing State of Mauritius," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1087-1100.
    4. Christy E. Manyi-Loh & Sampson N. Mamphweli & Edson L. Meyer & Golden Makaka & Michael Simon & Anthony I. Okoh, 2016. "An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    6. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    7. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    10. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    11. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    12. Toshiaki Sasao, 2004. "Analysis of the socioeconomic impact of landfill siting considering regional factors," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 6(2), pages 147-175, June.
    13. Seyed Rakhshan & Ali Kamyad & Sohrab Effati, 2015. "Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 505-525, March.
    14. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    15. Mónica García-Melón & Blanca Pérez-Gladish & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Paz Mendez-Rodriguez, 2016. "Assessing mutual funds’ corporate social responsibility: a multistakeholder-AHP based methodology," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 475-503, September.
    16. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    17. Periyasamy Elaiyaraju & Nagarajan Partha, 2012. "Biogas Production from Sago (Tapioca) Wastewater Using Anaerobic Batch Reactor," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(4), pages 631-645, June.
    18. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Cui, Ye & E, Hanyu & Pedrycz, Witold & Fayek, Aminah Robinson, 2022. "A granular multicriteria group decision making for renewable energy planning problems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1047-1059.
    20. Jha, Madan K. & Chowdary, V.M. & Kulkarni, Y. & Mal, B.C., 2014. "Rainwater harvesting planning using geospatial techniques and multicriteria decision analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 96-111.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:3:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s41685-018-0084-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.