IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journ1/v1y2021i1p49-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest Concession in Romania and Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Catalina Georgeta DINU

    (Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania)

Abstract

The Romanian Forestry Code regulates the principle of conserving the biodiversity of forest ecosystems, by inserting sustainable management measures: the establishment of protected natural areas, ecological reconstruction, regeneration and forest care. The concession contract is not, in itself, a way of sustainable forest management, as is the case in other countries. Thus, the objective of this study is to analyze the legislation specific to the forestry field from the perspective of the concession contract, by identifying regulations that would be an example of good practice. In this sense, we have identified the regulations in Brazil, given the measures that this country has partially managed to implement for the protection of forest lands, as a model that will be followed in the near future, by the Romanian legislator. The comparative method of the legislation of the two countries aims to determine the deficiencies of this law from the perspective of the impact that the conclusion of a forest concession contract may have on the concessioned property itself, as well as the way in which the public interest is respected. The identification of sustainable management criteria, according to which the exploitation of public or private forest land is assigned, is an essential element to be taken into account in the case of a concession, in order to develop legislative proposals to improve the legal framework by which the principle of conserving the biodiversity of forest ecosystems should be applied. A particularly useful aspect for further research would be to address the issue in terms of international investment law.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalina Georgeta DINU, 2021. "Forest Concession in Romania and Brazil," International Investment Law Journal, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 1(1), pages 49-55, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sja:journ1:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:49-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.investmentlaw.adjuris.ro/articole/An1V1/5.%20Catalina%20Dinu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. Gray, 2002. "Forest Concession Policies and Revenue Systems : Country Experience and Policy Changes for Sustainable Tropical Forestry," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14094, December.
    2. Cristina-Elena Popa Tache, 2020. "Introduction to International Investment Law," Books, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), edition 1, number 13.
    3. Dolzer, Rudolf & Schreuer, Christoph, 2012. "Principles of International Investment Law," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199651801.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Horn, Henrik & Tangerås, Thomas, 2016. "Economics and Politics of International Investment Agreements," Working Paper Series 1140, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    2. Jaakkola, Niko & Spiro, Daniel & van Benthem, Arthur A., 2019. "Finders, keepers?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 17-33.
    3. Crenguța Leaua & Ingrid A. Müller & Sofia Cozac, 2020. "Comparative View On The Role Of Domestic Courts In Arbitration: The Romanian Law Versus The Uncitral Model Law," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 9(2), pages 224-234, December.
    4. Jaivir Singh & Vatsala Shreeti & Parnil Urdhwareshe, 2022. "The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on FDI Inflows Into India: Some Empirical Results," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 57(3), pages 310-323, August.
    5. Horn, Henrik & Sanctuary, Mark, 2023. "Investment Treaties and the Replacement of Stranded Investment," Working Paper Series 1479, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 09 Feb 2024.
    6. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    7. Cristina Elena POPA (TACHE), 2021. "Adapting an Efficient Mechanism for Resolving International Investment Disputes to a New Era. Vienna Investment Arbitration and Mediation Rules," International Investment Law Journal, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 1(2), pages 91-101, July.
    8. Nováčková Daniela & Peráček Tomáš, 2021. "The Common European Investment Policy and Its Perspectives in the Context of the Achmea Case Law," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 153-169, May.
    9. Axel Berger & Wan‐Hsin Liu, 2021. "Can the G20 serve as a launchpad for a multilateral investment agreement?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 2284-2302, August.
    10. Horn, Henrik, 2018. "Investor-State vs. State-State Dispute Settlement," Working Paper Series 1248, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 20 Feb 2019.
    11. Hirano, Miharu, 2016. "Public participation in the global regulatory governance of water services: Global administrative law perspective on the Inspection Panel of the World Bank and amicus curiae in investment arbitration," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(PA), pages 21-31.
    12. Hansen, Christian P. & Lund, Jens F., 2011. "The political economy of timber taxation: The case of Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 630-641, October.
    13. Jozef Barunik & Zdenek Drabek & Matej Nevrla, 2020. "Investment Disputes and Abnormal Volatility of Stocks," Papers 2006.10505, arXiv.org.
    14. Tarald Gulseth Berge & Øyvind Stiansen, 2023. "Bureaucratic capacity and preference attainment in international economic negotiations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 467-498, July.
    15. Cristina Elena POPA (TACHE), 2021. "Ranking of Treatment Standards in International Investments," International Investment Law Journal, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 1(1), pages 79-87, February.
    16. Gina ORGA-DUMITRIU, 2022. "Reception of Contract Group Theory in European Contract Law," International Investment Law Journal, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 2(1), pages 46-68, February.
    17. Catalina-Georgeta Matei & Roxana-Anca Adam, 2012. "Public Works Concessions - Delimitation from Other Contracts," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 12(3), pages 139-146.
    18. Stephen R. Buzdugan, . "The global governance of FDI and the non-market strategies of TNCs: explaining the “backlash” against bilateral investment treaties," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    19. Horn, Henrik & Tangerås, Thomas, 2021. "Economics of international investment agreements," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Cashore, Benjamin & Nathan, Iben, 2020. "Can finance and market driven (FMD) interventions make “weak states” stronger? Lessons from the good governance norm complex in Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    forest concession; agreement; management; natural resource.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • K39 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journ1:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:49-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.