IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/econom/y2019i4p6-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Перспективы формирования экспортно ориентированных отраслевых цифровых платформ в рамках развивающихся экосистем в промышленности // The Prospects of Forming Export Oriented Sectoral Digital Platforms within the Framework of Developing Ecosystems in the Industry

Author

Listed:
  • I. Stepnov M.

    (Financial University)

  • J. Kovalchuk A.

    (Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University))

  • И. Степнов М.

    (Финансовый университет)

  • Ю. Ковальчук А.

    (Московский авиационный институт (Национальный исследовательский университет))

Abstract

The importance of forming digital solutions in export oriented industries is grounded not only by the needs of individual enterprises, but also by the necessity to protect national interests in the context of global economy through achieving a position of leadership in certain sectors. The authors demonstrate that inevitability of the process of digital transformations press for transformation of many economic relations. To attain the goals of the research and to make it possible to conduct comparative analysis the authors selected common highand medium technological industries according to the OECD and Rosstat (Federal State Statistics Service). The results of the comparative analysis demonstrate that the raw materials constituent is still great in export and what is needed is the development of institutional implementation medium for the export potential. It is confirmed that underexploitation of the export potential in machine-building industry tends to be a global trend, which allows to form strategies of breaking into global markets. The authors prove that, in the context of current “trade wars” intensification, export buildup is only possible through effective state support. The basis for creating export-oriented digital platforms must be ensured by their embeddedness into the identified sectoral ecosystems, the authors claim. It is ascertained that creating of a “digital profile” of the exporter (of a potential exporter) in a single register of exporters, and forming macroeconomic analytics to coordinate with the general state policy are of crucial importance. The authors come to the conclusion that the most effective realization of export-oriented digital platforms is only possible within sectoral ecosystems to broaden the relation scope of individual enterprises, which promises to greatly support the Russian manufacturers’ competitiveness in the global economy. Актуальность формирования цифровых решений в экспортно ориентированных отраслях промышленности обосновывается не только потребностью отдельных предприятий, но и необходимостью защиты национальных интересов в рамках глобальной экономики. Показано, что неотвратимость цифровизации требует преобразований многих экономических отношений. Для целей исследования и обеспечения возможности сравнительного анализа выделены высокои среднетехнологичные отрасли промышленности согласно зарубежной классификации по версии ОЭСР и общероссийской классификации по версии Росстата. Результаты проведенного сравнительного исследования позволили установить, что до настоящего времени остается доминирующей сырьевая составляющая экспорта и требуется развитие институциональной среды реализации экспортного потенциала. Подтверждено, что недоиспользование экспортного потенциала в машиностроении имеет признаки общемировой тенденции, позволяя формировать стратегии прорыва на мировые рынки. Доказано, что только за счет конкурентных рыночных стратегий в условиях «торговых войн» достичь наращивания экспорта можно только при эффективной поддержке государства. Показано, что создание экспортно ориентированных цифровых платформ должно обеспечиваться их включенностью в идентифицированные отраслевые экосистемы. Установлено, что особо значимыми для отраслевых экосистем являются создание в едином реестре экспортеров продукции «цифрового профиля» экспортера (потенциального экспортера) и формирование макроэкономической аналитики, обеспечивающих согласование экспорта с общей политикой государства. Сделан вывод о том, что наиболее эффективная реализация экспортно ориентированных цифровых платформ, обещающих оказать существенную поддержку российскому производителю по закреплению конкурентных позиций в глобальной экономике, возможна только при наличии отраслевых экосистем, расширяющих границы взаимодействия отдельных предприятий.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Stepnov M. & J. Kovalchuk A. & И. Степнов М. & Ю. Ковальчук А., 2019. "Перспективы формирования экспортно ориентированных отраслевых цифровых платформ в рамках развивающихся экосистем в промышленности // The Prospects of Forming Export Oriented Sectoral Digital Platforms," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 12(4), pages 6-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2019:i:4:p:6-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economy.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/537/506.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vulkan, Nir & Roth, Alvin E. & Neeman, Zvika (ed.), 2013. "The Handbook of Market Design," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199570515.
    2. Andrey Gnidchenko & Anastasia Mogilat & Olga Mikheeva & Vladimir Salnikov, 2016. "Foreign Technology Transfer: An Assessment of Russia’s Economic Dependence on High-Tech Imports," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 53-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    2. Marco LiCalzi, 2022. "Bipartite choices," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 45(2), pages 551-568, December.
    3. Lester, Benjamin & Visschers, Ludo & Wolthoff, Ronald, 2015. "Meeting technologies and optimal trading mechanisms in competitive search markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-15.
    4. Bettina Klaus & David F. Manlove & Francesca Rossi, 2014. "Matching under Preferences," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 14.07, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    5. Pham, Long & Teich, Jeffrey & Wallenius, Hannele & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2015. "Multi-attribute online reverse auctions: Recent research trends," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 1-9.
    6. Doğan, Battal, 2016. "Responsive affirmative action in school choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 69-105.
    7. Jaramillo, Paula & Kayı, Çaǧatay & Klijn, Flip, 2021. "School choice: Nash implementation of stable matchings through rank-priority mechanisms," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Klaus, Bettina & Klijn, Flip, 2016. "Equilibria of deferred acceptance with complete lists," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 98-101.
    9. Gnidchenko, A., 2016. "Import Substitution in Russian Industry: Current Situation and Prospects," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 32(4), pages 154-161.
    10. James Albrecht & Pieter A. Gautier & Susan Vroman, 2014. "Efficient Entry in Competing Auctions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3288-3296, October.
    11. John P. Dickerson & Ariel D. Procaccia & Tuomas Sandholm, 2019. "Failure-Aware Kidney Exchange," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1768-1791, April.
    12. Güell, Maia & Calsamiglia, Caterina, 2014. "The Illusion of School Choice: Empirical Evidence from Barcelona," CEPR Discussion Papers 10011, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Karakaya, Mehmet & Klaus, Bettina & Schlegel, Jan Christoph, 2019. "Top trading cycles, consistency, and acyclic priorities for house allocation with existing tenants," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Yao Cheng & Zaifu Yang, 2017. "Efficient Kidney Exchange with Dichotomous Preferences," Discussion Papers 17/13, Department of Economics, University of York.
    15. Albrecht, James & Cai, Xiaoming & Gautier, Pieter & Vroman, Susan, 2020. "Multiple applications, competing mechanisms, and market power," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Cheng, Yao & Yang, Zaifu, 2021. "Efficient Kidney Exchange with Dichotomous Preferences," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Nikhil Agarwal & Eric Budish, 2021. "Market Design," NBER Working Papers 29367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Hayri A. Arslan, 2021. "Preference estimation in centralized college admissions from reported lists," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2865-2911, November.
    19. Kircher, Philipp & Wright, Randall & Julien, Benoit & Guerrieri, Veronica, 2017. "Directed Search: A Guided Tour," CEPR Discussion Papers 12315, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. A. A. Gnidchenko, 2017. "Import substitution as a complementary strategy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 593-599, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:econom:y:2019:i:4:p:6-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economy.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.