IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i1p116-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Locating neighbourhood diversity in the American metropolis

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle Walker

Abstract

Racial and ethnic diversity in the United States is on the rise, as the country is projected to no longer have a racial majority by the mid-2040s. Much of this diversity is found in the United States’ large metropolitan areas, where it manifests itself unevenly. While some metropolitan neighbourhoods are growing highly diverse, others remain segregated by race and ethnicity. This paper introduces a framework for exploring the geography of neighbourhood diversity in US metropolitan areas, and defines the diversity gradient , a visual representation of how diversity varies with distance from the urban core. Analysis of the geography of metropolitan diversity from 1990 to 2010 reveals that the greatest increases in diversity are found in the suburbs and outlying areas, where diversity now peaks in many large metropolitan areas. Additional spatial analyses of neighbourhood diversity in Chicago and Dallas-Fort Worth show that clustering of highly diverse neighbourhoods has shifted to the suburbs from close-in urban areas, where many segregated and low-diversity neighbourhoods persist.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle Walker, 2018. "Locating neighbourhood diversity in the American metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 116-132, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:1:p:116-132
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098016643481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098016643481
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098016643481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David C. Folch & Sergio J. Rey, 2016. "The centralization index: A measure of local spatial segregation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 555-576, August.
    2. Alex Schafran, 2013. "Origins of an Urban Crisis: The Restructuring of the San Francisco Bay Area and the Geography of Foreclosure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 663-688, March.
    3. McMillen, Daniel P. & Singell, Larry Jr., 1992. "Work location, residence location, and the intraurban wage gradient," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 195-213, September.
    4. Lahiri, Kajal & Lankford, R Hamilton & Numrich, Richard P, 1989. "The Estimation and Interpretation of Urban Density Gradients," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 7(2), pages 227-235, April.
    5. Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), 2010. "Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-03647-7, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chocholatá Michaela & Furková Andrea, 2017. "Regional Disparities in Education Attainment Level in the European Union: A Spatial Approach," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 107-131, October.
    2. Motoyama, Yasuyuki & Cao, Cong & Appelbaum, Richard, 2014. "Observing regional divergence of Chinese nanotechnology centers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 11-21.
    3. Rey, Sergio, 2015. "Bells in Space: The Spatial Dynamics of US Interpersonal and Interregional Income Inequality," MPRA Paper 69482, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1967-1986, August.
    5. Padovano, Fabio & Petrarca, Ilaria, 2014. "Are the responsibility and yardstick competition hypotheses mutually consistent?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 459-477.
    6. Atems, Bebonchu, 2013. "The spatial dynamics of growth and inequality: Evidence using U.S. county-level data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 19-22.
    7. Giuseppe Espa & Giuseppe Arbia & Diego Giuliani, 2013. "Conditional versus unconditional industrial agglomeration: disentangling spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity in the analysis of ICT firms’ distribution in Milan," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 31-50, January.
    8. Manfred M. Fischer & Nico Pintar & Benedikt Sargant, 2016. "Austrian Outbound Foreign Direct Investment in Europe:A spatial econometric study," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, JUNE.
    9. Manfred Fischer, 2011. "A spatial Mankiw–Romer–Weil model: theory and evidence," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(2), pages 419-436, October.
    10. Kaixing Huang & Wenshou Yan & Jikun Huang, 2020. "Agricultural subsidies retard urbanisation in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1308-1327, October.
    11. Samantha Leorato & Maura Mezzetti, 2015. "Spatial Panel Data Model with error dependence: a Bayesian Separable Covariance Approach," CEIS Research Paper 338, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 09 Apr 2015.
    12. Anping Chen & Marlon Boarnet & Mark Partridge & Laura Wolf-Powers, 2014. "Local Protest, Global Movements: Capital, Community, and State in San Francisco , by Karl Beitel . 2013 . Philadelphia, PA : Temple University Press . 220 + x. ISBN: 1-4399-0995-4, $29.95 (paper); ISB," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 722-724, September.
    13. Mohl, Philipp & Hagen, Tobias, 2011. "Do EU structural funds promote regional employment? Evidence from dynamic panel data models," Working Paper Series 1403, European Central Bank.
    14. Daniel A. Griffith & Manfred M. Fischer, 2016. "Constrained Variants of the Gravity Model and Spatial Dependence: Model Specification and Estimation Issues," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Roberto Patuelli & Giuseppe Arbia (ed.), Spatial Econometric Interaction Modelling, chapter 0, pages 37-66, Springer.
    15. Cristina LINCARU & Vasilica CIUCA & Draga ATANASIU, 2015. "THE TENDENCY IDENTIFICATION OF OVERALL CLUSTERING OF REGISTERED UNEMPLOYMENT AT TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT LEVEL - UAT2 IN ROMANIA (International Conference “EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE OF LABOR MARKET ," Institute for Economic Forecasting Conference Proceedings 141104, Institute for Economic Forecasting.
    16. Henderson, Vernon & Mitra, Arindam, 1996. "The new urban landscape: Developers and edge cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 613-643, December.
    17. Zhonghua Huang & Xuejun Du, 2017. "Strategic interaction in local governments’ industrial land supply: Evidence from China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1328-1346, May.
    18. Sergio J. Rey, 2018. "Bells in Space," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 152-182, March.
    19. Wong, Linda & van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Clarke, Judith A., 2012. "The Impact of Agriculture on Waterfowl Abundance: Evidence from Panel Data," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Nivedita Mukherji & Jonathan Silberman, 2021. "Knowledge flows between universities and industry: the impact of distance, technological compatibility, and the ability to diffuse knowledge," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 223-257, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:1:p:116-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.