IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v37y2000i13p2399-2416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Guy

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, University of Newcastle, Claremont Tower, Newcastle upon Tyne, NEI 7RU, UK, s.c.guy@ncl.ac.uk)

  • John Henneberry

    (Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK, j.henneberry@shiffield.ac.uk)

Abstract

In their treatment of development, researchers in the property sector tend to adopt positivist methodologies which emphasise the application of rational decision-making techniques by utility-maximisers within a mainstream economics paradigm. While considerably increasing our understanding of the development process, such research offers a partial view of its subject from a particular perspective. Recently, alternative methodological and theoretical approaches have evolved which strive to understand the wider institutional context of the development process. The paper critically reflects on these institutionalist approaches in order to develop a research framework which blends economic and social analyses of property development processes. The paper draws upon (re)interpretations of the authors' recent research to address the following points. First, that the economic structuring of development is a product of and, in turn, affects social processes. This is illustrated by a consideration of the price mechanism in the property market. Secondly, that social structures and processes are as important as their economic equivalents in 'explaining' property development. This is addressed by a discussion of the ways in which recent shifts in the social organisation of the property sector are reframing the strategies of development actors, leading to new structures of property provision and use. The paper concludes by arguing for the need to develop an understanding of property development processes which combines a sensitivity to the economic and social framing of development strategies with a fine-grain treatment of the locally contingent social responses of property actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:13:p:2399-2416
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980020005398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980020005398
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980020005398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eamonn D'Arcy & Geoffrey Keogh, 1999. "The Property Market and Urban Competitiveness: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 917-928, May.
    2. M Ball, 1994. "The 1980s Property Boom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(5), pages 671-695, May.
    3. Patsy Healey, 1998. "Regulating property development and the capacity of the development industry," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 211-227, January.
    4. Richard Barras, 1987. "Technical Change and the Urban Development Cycle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 5-30, February.
    5. P Healey, 1994. "Urban Policy and Property Development: The Institutional Relations of Real-Estate Development in an Old Industrial Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 177-198, February.
    6. P Ganderton, 1994. "Modelling the Land Conversion Process: A Realist Perspective," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(5), pages 803-819, May.
    7. Michael Ball, 1998. "Institutions in British Property Research: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1501-1517, August.
    8. Hodgson, Geoffrey M, 1997. "The Ubiquity of Habits and Rules," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 21(6), pages 663-684, November.
    9. Hall, Peter A. & Taylor, Rosemary C. R., 1996. "Political science and the three new institutionalisms," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2007. "(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 209-229, February.
    2. Murray, Cameron K. & Frijters, Paul, 2016. "Clean money, dirty system: Connected landowners capture beneficial land rezoning," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 99-114.
    3. Thierry Theurillat & Pierre-Yves Donzé, 2015. "Retail Networks and Real Estate: the case of Swiss luxury watches in China and Southeast," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-28, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    4. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    5. Murray, Cameron K. & Frijters, Paul, 2015. "Clean Money in a Dirty System: Relationship Networks and Land Rezoning in Queensland," IZA Discussion Papers 9028, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Ambrose, Aimee & McCarthy, Lindsey, 2019. "Taming the 'masculine pioneers'? Changing attitudes towards energy efficiency amongst private landlords and tenants in New Zealand: A case study of Dunedin," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 165-176.
    7. Liis Ojamäe, 2009. "Making Choices in the Housing Market: A Social Construction of Housing Values," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 1(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Henneberry, 1999. "Convergence and Difference in Regional Office Development Cycles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(9), pages 1439-1465, August.
    2. Eamonn D'Arcy & Geoffrey Keogh, 1999. "The Property Market and Urban Competitiveness: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 917-928, May.
    3. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    4. Michael Ball, 1996. "London and Property Markets: A Long-term View," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(6), pages 859-876, June.
    5. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Michael Ball & Tanya Morrison & Andrew Wood, 1996. "Structures Investment and Economic Growth: A Long-term International Comparison," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(9), pages 1687-1706, November.
    7. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2007. "(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 209-229, February.
    8. Kauko Tom, 2019. "Institutions at the Interface of Urban Planning and Real Estate," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 17-30, September.
    9. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 337-361, March.
    10. Thierry Theurillat & Patrick Rérat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2015. "The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1414-1433, June.
    11. Sun Sheng Han & Yong Wang, 2003. "The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 91-112, January.
    12. Nikolaos Triantafyllopoulos, 2008. "Does Land Property Structure Affect Local Development Patterns? Evidence from a Greek Tourist Area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(4), pages 797-824, April.
    13. Tom Kauko, 2004. "Towards Infusing Institutions and Agency into House Price Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(8), pages 1507-1519, July.
    14. John Henneberry, 1995. "Developers, property cycles and local economic development: The case of Sheffield," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 10(2), pages 163-185, August.
    15. Ritchie, Holly A., 2016. "Unwrapping Institutional Change in Fragile Settings: Women Entrepreneurs Driving Institutional Pathways in Afghanistan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 39-53.
    16. Ramin Keivani & Ali Parsa & Stanley McGreal, 2001. "Globalisation, Institutional Structures and Real Estate Markets in Central European Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2457-2476, December.
    17. Michael Ball, 2002. "Cultural Explanation of Regional Property Markets: A Critique," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1453-1469, July.
    18. Yefimov, Vladimir, 2009. "Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics," MPRA Paper 48173, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Michel S. Zouboulakis & John Kamarianos, 2002. "Racionalidad y cooperación entre firmas. Examen del comportamiento habitual de las industrias griegas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 4(7), pages 98-113, July-Dece.
    20. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:13:p:2399-2416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.