IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v44y2007i2p209-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Doak

    (Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, PO Box 219, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AW, a.j.doak@reading.ac.uk)

  • Nikos Karadimitriou

    (Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, Wates House, 22 Gordon Street, London, WCIH OQB, UK, n.karadimitriou@ucl. ac.uk)

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework for the examination of land redevelopment based on a complex systems/networks approach. The agents and networks involved in property development can be seen as constituents of structures that perform complex processes. These structures interact, forming new more complex structures and networks. Redevelopment then can be conceptualised as a process of transformation: a complex system, involving developers, planners, landowners, investors, community groups, etc., through which a previously used site is transformed into new network space. Analysis of network relations points towards the 'duality' of structure and agency in these processes of system transformation and change. Insights from actor network theory can be conjoined with notions of complexity and chaos to build an understanding of the ways in which actors actively seek to shape these structures and systems, whilst at the same time being recursively shaped by them in their strategies and actions. Better understanding of the interactions between actors and the emergent qualities of the networks they form can improve our comprehension of the complex socio-spatial phenomena that redevelopment comprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2007. "(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 209-229, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:44:y:2007:i:2:p:209-229
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980601074953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980601074953
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980601074953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    2. Chiarella, Carl, 1988. "The cobweb model: Its instability and the onset of chaos," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 377-384, October.
    3. G L Clark, 1998. "Why Convention Dominates Pension Fund Trustee Investment Decisionmaking," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(6), pages 997-1015, June.
    4. Bob Jessop, 2000. "The Crisis of the National Spatio‐Temporal Fix and the Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 323-360, June.
    5. Simon Guy & Robert Harris, 1997. "Property in a Global-risk Society: Towards Marketing Research in the Office Sector," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 125-140, January.
    6. Geoffrey Keogh & Eamonn D'Arcy, 1999. "Property Market Efficiency: An Institutional Economics Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(13), pages 2401-2414, December.
    7. Brueckner, Jan K., 1980. "A vintage model of urban growth," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 389-402, November.
    8. Michael Ball, 2002. "Cultural Explanation of Regional Property Markets: A Critique," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1453-1469, July.
    9. Richard Cowell & Huw Thomas, 2002. "Managing Nature and Narratives of Dispossession: Reclaiming Territory in Cardiff Bay," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1241-1260, June.
    10. Paul Gallimore & Adelaide Gray, 2002. "The role of investor sentiment in property investment decisions," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 111-120, January.
    11. P Healey, 1994. "Urban Policy and Property Development: The Institutional Relations of Real-Estate Development in an Old Industrial Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 177-198, February.
    12. Michael Ball, 1998. "Institutions in British Property Research: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1501-1517, August.
    13. Wheaton, William C., 1982. "Urban residential growth under perfect foresight," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Simon Guy & John Henneberry & Steven Rowley, 2002. "Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1181-1196, June.
    15. Patsy Healey & Susan M. Barrett, 1990. "Structure and Agency in Land and Property Development Processes: Some Ideas for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 27(1), pages 89-103, February.
    16. T Gore & D Nicholson, 1991. "Models of the Land-Development Process: A Critical Review," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(5), pages 705-730, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2004. "Land Re-Use, Complexity And Actor-Networks: A Framework For Research," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2004-09, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    2. Eamonn D'Arcy & Geoffrey Keogh, 1999. "The Property Market and Urban Competitiveness: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 917-928, May.
    3. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    4. Richard Arnott & Petia Petrova, 2006. "The Property Tax as a Tax on Value: Deadweight Loss," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 13(2), pages 241-266, May.
    5. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    6. Ho-Yin Yue, 2012. "Why housing price in Hong Kong? An explanation in game theory approach," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 8-15.
    7. Suzanne Lanyi Charles, 2013. "Understanding the Determinants of Single-family Residential Redevelopment in the Inner-ring Suburbs of Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(8), pages 1505-1522, June.
    8. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    9. Siodla, James, 2015. "Razing San Francisco: The 1906 disaster as a natural experiment in urban redevelopment," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 48-61.
    10. É D'Arcy & G Keogh, 1997. "Towards a Property Market Paradigm of Urban Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(4), pages 685-706, April.
    11. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 337-361, March.
    12. Yehua Dennis Wei, 2016. "Towards Equitable and Sustainable Urban Space: Introduction to Special Issue on “Urban Land and Sustainable Development”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    13. Kono, Tatsuhito & Kotoku, Toshiaki & Otazawa, Toshimori, 2012. "Residential land use with demographic dynamics of young and old generations," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 283-295.
    14. Sun Sheng Han & Yong Wang, 2003. "The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 91-112, January.
    15. Richard Ballard & Siân Butcher, 2020. "Comparing the relational work of developers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 266-276, March.
    16. Arnott, Richard & Braid, Ralph & Davidson, Russell & Pines, David, 1999. "A general equilibrium spatial model of housing quality and quantity," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 283-316, May.
    17. Kono, Tatsuhito & Tsutaki, Keisuke, 2023. "Residential Land Use and Utilities of Multiple Generations with Lifespan Perspectives and Demographic Dynamics," MPRA Paper 117595, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Agustin Rodriguez-Bachiller, 1986. "Discontiguous Urban Growth and the New Urban Economics: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 23(2), pages 79-104, April.
    19. Braid, Ralph M., 2001. "Spatial Growth and Redevelopment with Perfect Foresight and Durable Housing," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 425-452, May.
    20. Thierry Theurillat & Pierre-Yves Donzé, 2015. "Retail Networks and Real Estate: the case of Swiss luxury watches in China and Southeast," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-28, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:44:y:2007:i:2:p:209-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.