IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i3p21582440231194491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Network Governance Work in Forest Land-Use Policy in the Local Government

Author

Listed:
  • Sataporn Roengtam
  • Agustiyara Agustiyara
  • Achmad Nurmandi

Abstract

Focusing on Indonesia’s Riau Province, this study examines the complexities of managing networks for forest governance, and how local governments should adopt and enforce policies in network settings based on multi-stakeholder participation. Data were collected through interviews and document analysis, and analyzed using network analysis. The finding show that network governance through regulation should be enforced through the network’s political structure, involve several local actors, and facilitate coordination and communication for mutual benefit, especially in forest land-use management. Trust and costs reflect the development of collaborative behavioral frameworks which can influence coordination capacity, including intergovernmental networks in forest land-use policy. Further, the separation of network governance from multiple linked actors, which seems more “ally†(i.e., lead-organization governed networks) than “join†(i.e., shared/participatory governance networks), is undoubtedly problematic. The network and building of trust between network stakeholders may never transform into multi-stakeholder management structures without enabling network governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sataporn Roengtam & Agustiyara Agustiyara & Achmad Nurmandi, 2023. "Making Network Governance Work in Forest Land-Use Policy in the Local Government," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231194491
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231194491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231194491
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231194491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oren Perez & Reuven Cohen & Nir Schreiber, 2019. "Governance through global networks and corporate signaling," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 447-469, December.
    2. McHenry, Mark P., 2013. "Technical and governance considerations for advanced metering infrastructure/smart meters: Technology, security, uncertainty, costs, benefits, and risks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 834-842.
    3. Erik-Hans Klijn & Tamyko Ysa & Vicenta Sierra & Evan Berman & Jurian Edelenbos & Don Y. Chen, 2015. "The Influence of Network Management and Complexity on Network Performance in Taiwan, Spain and the Netherlands," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 736-764, May.
    4. Schweinsberg, Stephen & Darcy, Simon & Cheng, Mingming, 2017. "The agenda setting power of news media in framing the future role of tourism in protected areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 241-252.
    5. Daniela Cristofoli & Benedetta Trivellato & Stefano Verzillo, 2019. "Network management as a contingent activity. A configurational analysis of managerial behaviors in different network settings," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(12), pages 1775-1800, December.
    6. Dutu, Richard, 2016. "Challenges and policies in Indonesia's energy sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 513-519.
    7. Irawan, Silvia & Tacconi, Luca & Ring, Irene, 2013. "Stakeholders' incentives for land-use change and REDD+: The case of Indonesia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 75-83.
    8. Junki Kim, 2006. "Networks, Network Governance, and Networked Networks," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 19-34, July.
    9. Justin Waring & Amanda Crompton, 2020. "The struggles for (and of) network management: an ethnographic study of non-dominant policy actors in the English healthcare system," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 297-315, February.
    10. Gallant, Kirsten & Withey, Patrick & Risk, Dave & van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Spafford, Lynsay, 2020. "Measurement and economic valuation of carbon sequestration in Nova Scotian wetlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Ramdani, Rijal & Lounela, Anu K., 2020. "Palm oil expansion in tropical peatland: Distrust between advocacy and service environmental NGOs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Bo Liu & Yun-Fei Shao & Guowei Liu & Debing Ni, 2022. "An Evolutionary Analysis of Relational Governance in an Innovation Ecosystem," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    13. Rolien Willmes & Margit van Wessel, 2021. "The Construction of (Non-)Responsibility in Governance Networks," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Wang, Huanming & Ran, Bing, 2022. "How business-related governance strategies impact paths towards the formation of global cities? An institutional embeddedness perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Chamaret, Cécile & Steyer, Véronique & Mayer, Julie C., 2020. "“Hands off my meter!” when municipalities resist smart meters: Linking arguments and degrees of resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Evgeny V. Popov, 2023. "Firms’ ecosystems: Developing a research programme," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 2-15, March.
    5. Coelho, Igor M. & Coelho, Vitor N. & Luz, Eduardo J. da S. & Ochi, Luiz S. & Guimarães, Frederico G. & Rios, Eyder, 2017. "A GPU deep learning metaheuristic based model for time series forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 412-418.
    6. McHenry, Mark P. & Doepel, David, 2015. "The ‘low power’ revolution: Rural off-grid consumer technologies and portable micropower systems in non-industrialised regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 679-684.
    7. Weihua Yan & Na Xu & Rui Xue & Zhenghang Ye & Zhaoyang Wang & Dingmeng Ren, 2022. "Efforts Proposed by IOC to Alleviate Pressure on Olympic Games Hosts and Evidence from Beijing 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Lei Yan & Xubin Lei & Kairong Hong & Hui Li & Mengyuan Chen, 2022. "Improving Farmer Willingness to Participate in the Transfer of Land Rights in Rural China: A Preference-Based Income Distribution Scheme," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Cunha, Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza & Börner, Jan & Wunder, Sven & Cosenza, Carlos Alberto Nunes & Lucena, André F.P., 2016. "The implementation costs of forest conservation policies in Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 209-220.
    10. Tri Purwaningsih, Vitriyani & Widodo, Tri, 2019. "Applying Tax Rate of 33,33% on Primary Energy in Indonesia," MPRA Paper 91315, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Nguyen, David N. & Lohmann, Gui & Esteban, Miguel, 2022. "Airport infrastructure development in Ogasawara Islands Japan: A comparison of media and public discourse analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Hafidz Wibisono & Jon C. Lovett & Dhimas Bayu Anindito, 2023. "The contestation of ideas behind Indonesia's rural electrification policies: The influence of global and national institutional dynamics," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    13. Burke, Paul J. & Widnyana, Jinnie & Anjum, Zeba & Aisbett, Emma & Resosudarmo, Budy & Baldwin, Kenneth G.H., 2019. "Overcoming barriers to solar and wind energy adoption in two Asian giants: India and Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1216-1228.
    14. Solis, Miriam & Bashar, Samira Binte, 2022. "Social equity implications of advanced water metering infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Inderberg, Tor Håkon, 2015. "Advanced metering policy development and influence structures: The case of Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 98-105.
    16. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Widayat Widayat, 2019. "Consumer Willingness and Acceptance of Smart Meters in Indonesia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Maulidia, Martha & Dargusch, Paul & Ashworth, Peta & Ardiansyah, Fitrian, 2019. "Rethinking renewable energy targets and electricity sector reform in Indonesia: A private sector perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 231-247.
    18. Yi Wang & Wei Han, 2022. "The Influence of Destination Promotion Videos on Residents’ Sense of Empowerment and Support for Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    19. Pereira, Guillermo Ivan & Specht, Jan Martin & Silva, Patrícia Pereira & Madlener, Reinhard, 2018. "Technology, business model, and market design adaptation toward smart electricity distribution: Insights for policy making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 426-440.
    20. Yang, Hongqiang & Li, Xi, 2018. "Potential variation in opportunity cost estimates for REDD+ and its causes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 138-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231194491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.