IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i3p2158244020948845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of New Generation Management Approaches on the Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Strategic Human Resource Management Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Erkut AltındaÄŸ
  • Hande BilaloÄŸlu Aktürk

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to research how and to what degree a company’s performance is affected by the new generation management approaches through strategic human resource applications. Within this framework, of the new generation management approaches, organizational ambidexterity, learning organization, and innovation capability have been included as independent variables, and of the strategic human resource applications, with the moderation of talent management and the recruitment and selection process, the effects on firm performance have been tested empirically. The study was conducted in 2018 by evaluating 387 of the questionnaires collected from the firm owners and middle and upper management of randomly selected large and mid-sized businesses in Istanbul, Ankara, Bursa, and Izmir. The collected data were tested using SPSS and, within the scope of structural equation modeling, using SmartPLS. At the conclusion of the research, of the new generation management approaches, it became evident that innovation capabilities have positive effects on the firm performance and that the learning organization also has positive effects on the firm performance by the effect of the moderating variables. Furthermore, a striking weakness was found in the relationship between the performance of a firm and innovation ambidexterity. It was also found that talent management plays no moderating role in the effects of new generation management approaches on the firm performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkut AltındaÄŸ & Hande BilaloÄŸlu Aktürk, 2020. "The Impact of New Generation Management Approaches on the Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Strategic Human Resource Management Applications," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:2158244020948845
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020948845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020948845
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020948845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gault, Fred, 2018. "Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 617-622.
    2. Farndale, Elaine & Scullion, Hugh & Sparrow, Paul, 2010. "The role of the corporate HR function in global talent management," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 161-168, April.
    3. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2017. "A conceptual framework of the relationship between total quality management, corporate social responsibility, innovation capability, and financial performance," Post-Print hal-03207361, HAL.
    4. Al Ariss, Akram & Cascio, Wayne F. & Paauwe, Jaap, 2014. "Talent management: Current theories and future research directions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 173-179.
    5. Lisboa, Ana & Skarmeas, Dionysis & Lages, Carmen, 2011. "Innovative capabilities: Their drivers and effects on current and future performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1157-1161.
    6. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2017. "A conceptual framework of the relationship between total quality management, corporate social responsibility, innovation capability, and financial performance," Post-Print hal-02042575, HAL.
    7. Carlos Botelho, 2020. "The influence of organizational culture and HRM on building innovative capability," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 69(7), pages 1373-1393, March.
    8. Michael Lubatkin & Zeki Simsek & Yan Ling & John F. Veiga, 2006. "Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms : The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration," Post-Print hal-02311781, HAL.
    9. Shlomo Maital, 2016. "Stories That Inspire About People Who Aspire," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Innovate Your Innovation Process 100 Proven Tools, chapter 1, pages 1-27, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Mohan P. Pokharel & Sang Ok Choi, 2015. "Exploring the relationships between the learning organization and organizational performance," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 126-148, February.
    11. Karlsson, Charlie & Tavassoli, Sam, 2015. "Innovation Strategies and Firm Performance," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 401, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    12. Minna Saunila, 2014. "Innovation capability for SME success: perspectives of financial and operational performance," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 163-175, July.
    13. Sebastian Raisch & Julian Birkinshaw & Gilbert Probst & Michael L. Tushman, 2009. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 685-695, August.
    14. Qing Cao & Eric Gedajlovic & Hongping Zhang, 2009. "Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 781-796, August.
    15. George, Gerard & Zahra, Shaker A. & Wood, D. Jr., 2002. "The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 577-609, October.
    16. Antoncic, Bostjan & Hisrich, Robert D., 2001. "Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 495-527, September.
    17. Zi-Lin He & Poh-Kam Wong, 2004. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 481-494, August.
    18. Martín-de Castro, Gregorio & Delgado-Verde, Miriam & Navas-López, José E. & Cruz-González, Jorge, 2013. "The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 351-363.
    19. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    20. Henry Kaiser, 1974. "An index of factorial simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 31-36, March.
    21. Quan Chen & Chun-Hsien Wang & Shi-Zheng Huang, 2020. "Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 72-96, January.
    22. Chen, Chung-Jen & Huang, Jing-Wen, 2009. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -- The mediating role of knowledge management capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 104-114, January.
    23. Iles, Paul & Chuai, Xin & Preece, David, 2010. "Talent Management and HRM in Multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 179-189, April.
    24. Scullion, Hugh & Collings, David G. & Caligiuri, Paula, 2010. "Global talent management," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 105-108, April.
    25. Chen, Yan, 2017. "Dynamic ambidexterity: How innovators manage exploration and exploitation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 385-394.
    26. Stacy Wassell & Marcia Bouchard, 2020. "Rebooting strategic human resource management: integrating technology to drive talent management," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 93-113.
    27. Minna Saunila, 2016. "Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(2), pages 162-176, February.
    28. Adelaide Wilcox King & Carl P. Zeithaml, 2001. "Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 75-99, January.
    29. Ngo, Liem Viet & O'Cass, Aron, 2013. "Innovation and business success: The mediating role of customer participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1134-1142.
    30. Peter Boumgarden & Jackson Nickerson & Todd R. Zenger, 2012. "Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 587-610, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derya Çelik & Ülkü Uzunçarşılı, 2023. "Is the Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity and Technological Innovation Capability on Firm Performance Mediated by Competitive Advantage? An Empirical Research on Turkish Manufacturing and Service ," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    2. Wenke, Kathrin & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian, 2021. "Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 653-665.
    3. Solís-Molina, Miguel & Hernández-Espallardo, Miguel & Rodríguez-Orejuela, Augusto, 2018. "Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 181-194.
    4. Katou, Anastasia A. & Budhwar, Pawan S. & Patel, Charmi, 2021. "A trilogy of organizational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, employee work engagement and environmental changes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 688-700.
    5. Jorge Ferreira & Sofia Cardim & Arnaldo Coelho, 2021. "Dynamic Capabilities and Mediating Effects of Innovation on the Competitive Advantage and Firm’s Performance: the Moderating Role of Organizational Learning Capability," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 620-644, June.
    6. Shuwaikh, Fatima & Brintte, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2022. "The impact of dynamic ambidexterity on the performance of organizations: Evidence from corporate venture capital investing in North America," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 991-1009.
    7. Vahlne, Jan-Erik & Jonsson, Anna, 2017. "Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 57-70.
    8. Olga Kassotaki, 2022. "Review of Organizational Ambidexterity Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    9. Partanen, Jukka & Kohtamäki, Marko & Patel, Pankaj C. & Parida, Vinit, 2020. "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    10. Jan Ossenbrink & Joern Hoppmann & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2019. "Hybrid Ambidexterity: How the Environment Shapes Incumbents’ Use of Structural and Contextual Approaches," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1319-1348, November.
    11. Manuel Guisado-González & Jennifer González-Blanco & José Luis Coca-Pérez, 2019. "Exploration, exploitation, and firm age in alliance portfolios," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(4), pages 387-406, December.
    12. David B. Audretsch & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "Is ambidexterity the missing link between entrepreneurship, management, and innovation?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1891-1918, December.
    13. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio, 2020. "Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 363-372.
    14. Andreea N. Kiss & Dirk Libaers & Pamela S. Barr & Tang Wang & Miles A. Zachary, 2020. "CEO cognitive flexibility, information search, and organizational ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2200-2233, December.
    15. José Andrade & Mário Franco & Luis Mendes, 2021. "Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2111-2136, October.
    16. Jan Ossenbrink & Joern Hoppmann, 2019. "Polytope Conditioning and Linear Convergence of the Frank–Wolfe Algorithm," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 1319-1348, February.
    17. Christine Chou & Steven O. Kimbrough, 2016. "An agent-based model of organizational ambidexterity decisions and strategies in new product development," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 4-46, March.
    18. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Gomes, Emanuel, 2020. "Unpacking the effect of strategic ambidexterity on performance: A cross-country comparison of MMNEs developing product-service innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    19. Ljungquist, Urban, 2012. "New Dimensions Added for Enhanced Core Competence Application," Working Papers 2012/03, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics.
    20. Marina Estrada-Cruz & Noelia Rodriguez-Hernández & Antonio J. Verdú-Jover & Jose Maria Gómez-Gras, 2022. "The effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between strategic entrepreneurship and organizational results," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:2158244020948845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.