IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v230y2016i1p4-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure distributions in multicomponent systems with imperfect repairs

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Arnold
  • Stefanka Chukova
  • Yu Hayakawa

Abstract

We present a model for correlated failures in multicomponent systems where failed components are repaired. Due to these repairs multiple failures of each component are observable. Repair is instantaneous, but imperfect: in general the component is not returned to the good-as-new condition. Correlation amongst failures and the overall ageing of the system are modelled by treating each component failure as a shock which damages the other components in the system. We construct the likelihood for observations generated by such a system, and show how to simulate from this model. We demonstrate inference of the model parameters with simulated data and two real-world examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Arnold & Stefanka Chukova & Yu Hayakawa, 2016. "Failure distributions in multicomponent systems with imperfect repairs," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(1), pages 4-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:1:p:4-17
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X15584853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X15584853
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X15584853?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaap H. Abbring & Gerard J. Van Den Berg, 2003. "The identifiability of the mixed proportional hazards competing risks model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(3), pages 701-710, August.
    2. Simon M. S. Lo & Ralf A. Wilke, 2010. "A copula model for dependent competing risks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(2), pages 359-376, March.
    3. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    4. Karen Bandeen-Roche, 2002. "Modelling multivariate failure time associations in the presence of a competing risk," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(2), pages 299-314, June.
    5. Moshe Shaked & J. George Shanthikumar, 1986. "Multivariate Imperfect Repair," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 437-448, June.
    6. Chukova, S. & Arnold, R. & Wang, Dong Q., 2004. "Warranty analysis: An approach to modeling imperfect repairs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 57-68, May.
    7. Murthy, D. N. P. & Nguyen, D. G., 1985. "Study of a multi-component system with failure interaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 330-338, September.
    8. Wang, Wenbin & Banjevic, Dragan & Pecht, Michael, 2010. "A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 912-920.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajiv N Rai & Nomesh Bolia, 2014. "Availability-based optimal maintenance policies for repairable systems in military aviation by identification of dominant failure modes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(1), pages 52-61, February.
    2. Flage, Roger, 2014. "A delay time model with imperfect and failure-inducing inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    4. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    5. Simon M.S. Lo & Ralf A. Wilke, 2011. "Identifiability and estimation of the sign of a covariate effect in the competing risks model," Discussion Papers 11/03, University of Nottingham, School of Economics.
    6. Kim, Dongwoo, 2023. "Partially identifying competing risks models: An application to the war on cancer," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 536-564.
    7. Chien, Yu-Hung & Zhang, Zhe George & Yin, Xiaoling, 2019. "On optimal preventive-maintenance policy for generalized Polya process repairable products under free-repair warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 68-78.
    8. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    9. Arntz, Melanie & Lo, Simon M. S. & Wilke, Ralf A., 2008. "Bounds analysis of competing risks : a nonparametric evaluation of the effect of unemployment benefits on migration in Germany (Revised version of the FDZ Methodenbericht No. 04/2007)," FDZ Methodenreport 200806_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    10. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan, 2012. "Optimal inspection of a complex system subject to periodic and opportunistic inspections and preventive replacements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 649-660.
    12. Zhang, Nan & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne, 2018. "Optimal imperfect maintenance cost analysis of a two-component system with failure interactions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 24-34.
    13. Yicheng Zhou & Zhenzhou Lu & Yan Shi & Kai Cheng, 2019. "The copula-based method for statistical analysis of step-stress accelerated life test with dependent competing failure modes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 401-418, June.
    14. Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Pintelon, Liliane, 2013. "A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 39-50.
    15. Sokbae Lee, 2006. "Identification of a competing risks model with unknown transformations of latent failure times," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(4), pages 996-1002, December.
    16. Elena Casquel & Antoni Cunyat, "undated". "The Welfare Cost of Business Cycles in an Economy with Nonclearing Markets," Working Papers 2005-19, FEDEA.
    17. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    18. Zhao, Xiujie & He, Shuguang & Xie, Min, 2018. "Utilizing experimental degradation data for warranty cost optimization under imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 108-119.
    19. Melanie Arntz & Simon Lo & Ralf Wilke, 2014. "Bounds analysis of competing risks: a non-parametric evaluation of the effect of unemployment benefits on migration," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 199-228, February.
    20. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:1:p:4-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.