IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jospec/v22y2021i3p295-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the Money: Gender and Jockey Success on the Thoroughbred Racetrack

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander D. Binder
  • Paul W. Grimes
  • Russell G. Winterbotham

Abstract

This paper examines the relative performance and access to mounts of female jockeys in American horseracing, the only major professional sport where female and male athletes directly compete on a regular basis. We modeled the determinants of the probability for a jockey finishing a race “in-the-money†—placing first, second, or third, and the determinants for receiving mounts. Among other findings, the results indicated that the probability for female jockeys finishing a race in the money was not significantly different from male jockeys, ceteris paribus , yet female jockeys continue to receive fewer mounts after controlling for other relevant, observable factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander D. Binder & Paul W. Grimes & Russell G. Winterbotham, 2021. "In the Money: Gender and Jockey Success on the Thoroughbred Racetrack," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 22(3), pages 295-328, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:22:y:2021:i:3:p:295-328
    DOI: 10.1177/1527002520975839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1527002520975839
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1527002520975839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Alasdair & Yang, Fuyu, 2015. "Does society underestimate women? Evidence from the performance of female jockeys in horse racing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 106-118.
    2. Frank A. Gamrat & Raymond D. Sauer, 2000. "The Utility of Sport and Returns to Ownership," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 1(3), pages 219-235, August.
    3. Alasdair Brown & Fuyu Yang, 2017. "Selection and incentives in contests: evidence from horse racing," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 250-253, February.
    4. Ramon P. DeGennaro, 2003. "The Utility of Sport and Returns to Ownership," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 4(2), pages 145-153, May.
    5. Bentley Coffey & M. T. Maloney, 2010. "The Thrill of Victory: Measuring the Incentive to Win," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(1), pages 87-112, January.
    6. Barry Bozeman & Daniel Fay, 2013. "Minority Football Coaches’ Diminished Careers: Why is the “Pipeline” Clogged?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 94(1), pages 29-58, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cashmore, Vanessa & Coster, Neil & Forrest, David & McHale, Ian & Buraimo, Babatunde, 2022. "Female jockeys - what are the odds?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 703-713.
    2. Michael Cary & Heather Stephens, 2023. "Gendered Consequences of COVID-19 Among Professional Tennis Players," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 24(2), pages 241-266, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Madden, 2015. "Welfare Economics of “Financial Fair Play†in a Sports League With Benefactor Owners," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 16(2), pages 159-184, February.
    2. Conor Parsons & Ian Smith, 2008. "The Price of Thoroughbred Yearlings in Britain," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 9(1), pages 43-66, February.
    3. David Butler & Robert Butler & Robert Simmons, 2022. "Contracts, pay and performance in the sport of kings: Evidence from horse racing," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 152-175, March.
    4. Brad R. Humphreys & Jane E. Ruseski, 2010. "Problems With Data on the Sport Industry," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 11(1), pages 60-76, February.
    5. Brad Humphreys & Bernd Frick, 2019. "Prize Structure and Performance: Evidence from NASCAR," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Jed DeVaro & Oliver Gürtler, 2020. "Strategic shirking in competitive labor markets: A general model of multi‐task promotion tournaments with employer learning," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 335-376, April.
    7. Legge, Stefan & Schmid, Lukas, 2013. "Rankings, Random Successes, and Individual Performance," Economics Working Paper Series 1340, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    8. McAlvanah, Patrick & Moul, Charles C., 2013. "The house doesn’t always win: Evidence of anchoring among Australian bookies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 87-99.
    9. Glenn Boyle & Gerald Ward, 2018. "Do Better Informed Investors Always Do Better? A Buyback Puzzle," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(4), pages 2137-2157, October.
    10. Michael Babington & Sebastian J. Goerg & Carl Kitchens, 2020. "Do Tournaments With Superstars Encourage or Discourage Competition?," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(1), pages 44-63, January.
    11. Paul Madden, 2012. "Welfare Economics of "Financial Fair Play" in a Sports League With Benefactor Owners," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1221, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    12. Hartmann, Laura & Spiller, Achim, 2015. "Luxusaffinität deutscher Reitsportler: Implikationen für das Marketing im Reitsportsegment," DARE Discussion Papers 1501, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    13. Linnemer, Laurent & Visser, Michael, 2016. "Self-selection in tournaments: The case of chess players," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 126(PA), pages 213-234.
    14. Aurelie Charles & Dongxu Wu & Zhongmin Wu, 2019. "Economic Shocks on Subjective Well-Being: Re-assessing the Determinants of Life-Satisfaction After the 2008 Financial Crisis," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1041-1055, April.
    15. Emily J. Plant & C. Jill Stowe, 2019. "Is Moneyball Relevant on the Racetrack? A New Approach to Evaluating Future Racehorses," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 20(3), pages 428-447, April.
    16. Richard McManus & Karen Mumford & Cristina Sechel, 2022. "Measuring research excellence amongst economics lecturers in the UK," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 386-404, April.
    17. Green, Colin & Lozano, Fernando & Simmons, Rob, 2015. "Rank-order tournaments, probability of winning and investing in talent: evidence from champions' league qualifying rules," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 232, pages 30-40, May.
    18. David Gill & Zdenka Kissová & Jaesun Lee & Victoria Prowse, 2019. "First-Place Loving and Last-Place Loathing: How Rank in the Distribution of Performance Affects Effort Provision," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 494-507, February.
    19. Roman M. Sheremeta, 2016. "The pros and cons of workplace tournaments," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 302-302, October.
    20. Mills, Brian M., 2017. "Technological innovations in monitoring and evaluation: Evidence of performance impacts among Major League Baseball umpires," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 189-199.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:22:y:2021:i:3:p:295-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.