IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jjlobr/v1y2012i1p115-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Influence Tactics by Children in India

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Chaudhary

    (Monica Chaudhary is a Senior Lecturer at Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, India. E-mail: monicarana@gmail.com)

  • Aayushi Gupta

Abstract

Children constitute a major consumer market; they have very strong power to influence purchase decisions, and they have been playing an important role in the family buying process with direct influence on purchasing power of snacks and sweets, and indirect influence while shopping for big-ticket items. Children are becoming stronger and they use different strategies to persuade their parents. This article attempts to highlight the different strategies which children use today to influence their parents. Demographic characteristics of a child such as age, gender, and number of siblings have an important role in the usage of different influence tactics by children. The study is conducted through primary survey (questionnaire) on 175 children in the age group of 8–12 years. Collected data are analyzed based on frequency distributions. The collected data are summarized and coded by using Statistical Package for Social Scientists 16.0 (SPSS) and Microsoft Excel. The general findings of the study suggest that demographics play an important role only in a few influence strategies like emotional and persuasion. Marketers should understand this and make an effort in tapping the right chord to make their product more buyable by families.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Chaudhary & Aayushi Gupta, 2012. "Use of Influence Tactics by Children in India," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 1(1), pages 115-125, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jjlobr:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:115-125
    DOI: 10.1177/227868211200100108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/227868211200100108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/227868211200100108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belk, Russell W & Bahn, Kenneth D & Mayer, Robert N, 1982. "Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(1), pages 4-17, June.
    2. Belch, George E. & Belch, Michael A. & Ceresino, Gayle, 1985. "Parental and teenage child influences in family decision making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 163-176, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Desmichel, Perrine & Ordabayeva, Nailya & Kocher, Bruno, 2020. "What if diamonds did not last forever? Signaling status achievement through ephemeral versus iconic luxury goods," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 49-65.
    2. Heffner, Reid R., 2007. "Semiotics and Advanced Vehicles: What Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) Mean and Why it Matters to Consumers," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9mw1t4w3, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Manish Mittal, 2011. "Television Viewing and Perception of Parental Concern among Urban Indian Children," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 36(1), pages 45-59, February.
    4. Labrecque, JoAnne & Ricard, Line, 2001. "Children's influence on family decision-making: a restaurant study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 173-176, November.
    5. Shijin Yoo & Seh-Woong Chung & Jin Han, 2006. "A Durable Replacement Model for Symbolic versus Utilitarian Consumption: An Integrated Cultural and Socio-economic Perspective," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 193-206.
    6. Lee, Jieun & Ko, Eunju & Megehee, Carol M., 2015. "Social benefits of brand logos in presentation of self in cross and same gender influence contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1341-1349.
    7. Lien, Nguyen Huong & Westberg, Kate & Stavros, Constantino & Robinson, Linda J., 2018. "Family decision-making in an emerging market: Tensions with tradition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 479-489.
    8. Christopher, Andrew N. & Schlenker, Barry R., 2000. "The impact of perceived material wealth and perceiver personality on first impressions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Ximena Garcia-Rada & Lalin Anik & Dan Ariely, 2019. "Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 27-43, March.
    10. Heleen van der Meulen & Rinaldo Kühne & Suzanna J. Opree, 2018. "Validating the Material Values Scale for Children (MVS-c) for Use in Early Childhood," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(4), pages 1201-1216, August.
    11. Stephen Ntuara Kiriinya, 2014. "Determinants of Children's Influence on Family Purchase Decisions in Kenya," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(7), pages 325-339, July.
    12. Claus, Bart & Geyskens, Kelly & Millet, Kobe & Dewitte, Siegfried, 2012. "The referral backfire effect: The identity-threatening nature of referral failure," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 370-379.
    13. Singh, Pallavi & Sahadev, Sunil & Oates, Caroline J. & Alevizou, Panayiota, 2020. "Pro-environmental behavior in families: A reverse socialization perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 110-121.
    14. Fernando Oliveira Santini & Wagner Junior Ladeira & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Diego Costa Pinto, 2018. "The brand experience extended model: a meta-analysis," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 519-535, November.
    15. Reed, Americus & Forehand, Mark R. & Puntoni, Stefano & Warlop, Luk, 2012. "Identity-based consumer behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 310-321.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3624 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Barton, Belinda & Zlatevska, Natalina & Oppewal, Harmen, 2022. "Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 741-758.
    18. Stead, Martine & McDermott, Laura & MacKintosh, Anne Marie & Adamson, Ashley, 2011. "Why healthy eating is bad for young people's health: Identity, belonging and food," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1131-1139, April.
    19. Chetna Arora & Saloni Pawan Diwan, 2022. "Children influence on family purchase decisions across product categories," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(7), pages 1-21, July.
    20. BOUSSIF, Torkia & ISSAOUI, Fakhri & DALY CHAKER, Najeh, 2015. "The Effects of the Teenagers (as Web Experts) in the Family Decision Making in Online Purchase Process: an Application to the Booking of Tourist Nights," MPRA Paper 61043, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Wang, Sijun & Holloway, Betsy B. & Beatty, Sharon E. & Hill, William W., 2007. "Adolescent influence in family purchase decisions: An update and cross-national extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 1117-1124, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jjlobr:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:115-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.