IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v53y2021i6p1547-1564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solo self-employment, entrepreneurial subjectivity and the security–precarity continuum: Evidence from private tutors in the supplementary education industry

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah L Holloway

    (Geography and Environment, 5156Loughborough University, UK)

  • Helena Pimlott-Wilson

    (Geography and Environment, 5156Loughborough University, UK)

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is regarded by policy makers and politicians as an accelerant for economic development. Economic geography demonstrates that rather than stimulating entrepreneurship in general, policy makers should support specific forms of entrepreneurship that fuel wider growth. The paper's original contribution is to insist that entrepreneurship research must also explore less growth-oriented, but crucially very widespread, forms of entrepreneurial activity. The paper therefore places solo self-employment – the self-employed without employees – centre stage as an exemplar of this trend. Research is presented on private tutors who run businesses from home, offering children one-to-one tuition in the burgeoning supplementary education industry. The paper scrutinises the causes, configuration and consequences of such solo self-employment as an economically marginal, but numerically dominant, form of entrepreneurship. In so doing, it makes three conceptual advances in the exploration of heterogeneous entrepreneurship. First, in examining why individuals become self-employed, the paper moves beyond classic efforts to understand entrepreneurship through binary push/pull mechanisms in models of occupational choice. Instead, the analysis demonstrates the importance of risk in entrepreneurship and paid employment, highlighting the multiple pathways into solo self-employment as opportunities and constraints coalesce in individual's lives. Secondly, in considering how the solo self-employed think about business, the research breaks through conventional definitions of entrepreneurship to demonstrate that solo self-employment involves a distinctively entrepreneurial subjectivity and practices. Thirdly, by investigating the consequences of solo self-employment, the findings transcend dualist interpretations of self-employment as the realm of entrepreneurial wealth or economic precarity, highlighting instead a security–precarity continuum in immediate and long-term outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah L Holloway & Helena Pimlott-Wilson, 2021. "Solo self-employment, entrepreneurial subjectivity and the security–precarity continuum: Evidence from private tutors in the supplementary education industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1547-1564, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:6:p:1547-1564
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X211009237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X211009237
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X211009237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moro, Andrea & Maresch, Daniela & Fink, Matthias & Ferrando, Annalisa & Piga, Claudio, 2020. "Spillover effects of government initiatives fostering entrepreneurship on the access to bank credit for entrepreneurial firms in Europe," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Richard T Harrison & Claire M Leitch & Maura McAdam, 2020. "Woman’s entrepreneurship as a gendered niche: the implications for regional development policy [Exploring the false promise of entrepreneurship through a postfeminist critique of the enterprise pol," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 1041-1067.
    3. Oli Mould & Tim Vorley & Kai Liu, 2014. "Invisible Creativity? Highlighting the Hidden Impact of Freelancing in London's Creative Industries," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(12), pages 2436-2455, December.
    4. Stefan Schneck, 2020. "Self-employment as a source of income inequality," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(1), pages 45-64, March.
    5. Neil Lee & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2021. "Entrepreneurship and the fight against poverty in US cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 31-52, February.
    6. Baumol, William J., 1996. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 3-22, January.
    7. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2016. "Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 627-641, February.
    8. László Szerb & Esteban Lafuente & Krisztina Horváth & Balázs Páger, 2019. "The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 1308-1320, September.
    9. Darja Reuschke, 2016. "The Importance of Housing for Self-employment," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(4), pages 378-400, October.
    10. Colin Mason & Ross Brown, 2013. "Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 211-225, February.
    11. Rachel Cole, 2017. "Estimating the impact of private tutoring on academic performance: primary students in Sri Lanka," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 142-157, March.
    12. Bewley, Truman, 2002. "Interviews as a valid empirical tool in economics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 343-353.
    13. André Stel & Peter van der Zwan, 2020. "Analyzing the changing education distributions of solo self-employed workers and employer entrepreneurs in Europe," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 429-445, August.
    14. Bögenhold, Dieter & Klinglmair, Andrea, 2016. "Independent work, modern organizations and entrepreneurial labor: Diversity and hybridity of freelancers and self-employment," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(6), pages 843-858, November.
    15. Audrey Light & Robert Munk, 2018. "Business Ownership versus Self†Employment," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 435-468, July.
    16. Tito Boeri & Giulia Giupponi & Alan B. Krueger & Stephen Machin, 2020. "Solo Self-Employment and Alternative Work Arrangements: A Cross-Country Perspective on the Changing Composition of Jobs," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 170-195, Winter.
    17. Joseph Choonara, 2020. "The Evolution of Generalised and Acute Job Tenure Insecurity," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(4), pages 713-725, August.
    18. Matthias Brachert & Walter Hyll & Abdolkarim Sadrieh, 2020. "Entry into self-employment and individuals’ risk-taking propensities," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1057-1074, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Zhimin & Wang, Xia & Xie, Lingmin & Duan, Kaifeng, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem and the quality and quantity of regional entrepreneurship: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 499-509.
    2. Francesco Quatraro & Marco Vivarelli, 2015. "Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 277-305.
    3. Merkel, Janet & Suwala, Lech, 2021. "Intermediaries, work and creativity in creative and innovative sectors. The case of Berlin," EconStor Open Access Book Chapters, in: Culture, Creativity and Economy. Collaborative practices, value creation and spaces of creativity., pages 56-69, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2021. "Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    5. Chong Kyoon Lee & Griffin W. Cottle & Sharon A. Simmons & Johan Wiklund, 2021. "Fear not, want not: Untangling the effects of social cost of failure on high-growth entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 531-553, June.
    6. Bögenhold, Dieter & Klinglmair, Robert & Kandutsch, Florian, 2018. "Self-employment on the way in a digital economy: A variety of shades of grey," MPRA Paper 85321, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Daniel L. Bennett, 2021. "Local economic freedom and creative destruction in America," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 333-353, January.
    8. Dieter Boegenhold & Robert Klinglmair & Florian Kandutsch, 2017. "Solo Self-Employment, Human Capital and Hybrid Labour in the Gig Economy," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 23-32.
    9. José Ernesto Amorós & Carlos Poblete & Vesna Mandakovic, 2019. "R&D transfer, policy and innovative ambitious entrepreneurship: evidence from Latin American countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1396-1415, October.
    10. Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov & Halvarsson, Daniel & Gustavsson Tingvall, Patrik & McKelvie, Alexander, 2021. "Do Targeted R&D Grants Towards Potential Highgrowth Firms Increase Employment and Demand for High Human Capital Workers?," HFI Working Papers 23, Institute of Retail Economics (Handelns Forskningsinstitut).
    11. Venâncio, Ana & Picoto, Winnie & Pinto, Inês, 2023. "Time-to-unicorn and digital entrepreneurial ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Maksim Belitski & Ana-Maria Grigore & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Political entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship ecosystem perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1973-2004, December.
    13. Neil Lee & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2021. "Entrepreneurship and the fight against poverty in US cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 31-52, February.
    14. Boudreaux, Christopher & Caudill, Steven, 2019. "Entrepreneurship, Institutions, and Economic Growth: Does the Level of Development Matter?," MPRA Paper 94244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Kantis, Hugo D. & Federico, Juan S. & García, Sabrina Ibarra, 2020. "Entrepreneurship policy and systemic conditions: Evidence-based implications and recommendations for emerging countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    16. Bernd Wurth & Erik Stam & Ben Spigel, 2022. "Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 729-778, May.
    17. González-Serrano, María Huertas & Crespo-Hervás, Josep & Pérez-Campos, Carlos & Calabuig, Ferran, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems for developing the sports industry in European Union countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 667-677.
    18. Norin Arshed & Sara Carter & Colin Mason, 2014. "The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 639-659, October.
    19. Elaine Laing & André Stel & David J. Storey, 2022. "Formal and informal entrepreneurship: a cross-country policy perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 807-826, October.
    20. Besnik A. Krasniqi & Sameeksha Desai, 2016. "Institutional drivers of high-growth firms: country-level evidence from 26 transition economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1075-1094, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:6:p:1547-1564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.