IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v21y1989i11p1533-1539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Relationship between the Supply-Driven and the Demand-Driven Input — Output Model

Author

Listed:
  • E Dietzenbacher

    (Econometrics Institute, University of Groningen, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

In this paper, the relationship between the assumptions in the supply-driven and the demand-driven input-output model is discussed. A necessary and sufficient condition is given for the stability of the input coefficients, the output coefficients, and both coefficients. For both models, the effects of a demand pull on the total outputs and on the primary inputs are analytically expressed. Also, the effects of a supply push on the total outputs and on the final outputs are expressed, again for both models. In general, the assumption of fixed input coefficients in the demand-driven model does not hold, but computations are still based on it. A necessary and sufficient condition is given for the correctness of the computed total outputs, both for a demand pull and a supply push. Similar results are obtained for the supply-driven input — output model.

Suggested Citation

  • E Dietzenbacher, 1989. "On the Relationship between the Supply-Driven and the Demand-Driven Input — Output Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(11), pages 1533-1539, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:21:y:1989:i:11:p:1533-1539
    DOI: 10.1068/a211533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a211533
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a211533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bon, Ranko, 1986. "Comparative stability analysis of demand-side and supply-side input-output models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 231-235.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Louis De Mesnard, 2009. "Is The Ghosh Model Interesting?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 361-372, May.
    2. Mostafa Shaaban & Carmen Schwartz & Joseph Macpherson & Annette Piorr, 2021. "A Conceptual Model Framework for Mapping, Analyzing and Managing Supply–Demand Mismatches of Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Erik Dietzenbacher & Ronald E. Miller, 2015. "Reflections On The Inoperability Input--Output Model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 478-486, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Torre, 1993. "Sur la signification théorique du modèle d'offre multisectoriel," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(5), pages 951-970.
    2. Fidel Aroche Reyes & Marco Antonio Marquez Mendoza, 2021. "Demand-Driven and Supply-Sided Input–Output Models," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(2), pages 251-267, June.
    3. Marek Wigier, 2014. "Agribusiness and economic development during Poland’s membership in the EU," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, pages 39-49.
    4. Louis de Mesnard, 1996. "Biproportion et offre dominante. A propos de l'article d'André Torre : "Sur la signification théorique du modèle d'offre multisectoriel."," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(1), pages 167-175.
    5. Louis De Mesnard, 2009. "Is The Ghosh Model Interesting?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 361-372, May.
    6. Zhang, Youguo, 2010. "Supply-side structural effect on carbon emissions in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 186-193, January.
    7. Aroche Reyes, Fidel & Marquez Mendoza, Marco Antonio, 2013. "The Demand Driven and the Supply-Sided Input-Output Models. Notes for the debate," MPRA Paper 61132, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Richard Wood, 2011. "Construction, Stability And Predictability Of An Input-Output Time-Series For Australia," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 175-211.
    9. R E Miller, 1989. "Stability of Supply Coefficients and Consistency of Supply-Driven and Demand-Driven Input — Output Models: A Comment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(8), pages 1113-1120, August.
    10. Wu, Kuei-Yen & Huang, Yun-Hsun & Wu, Jung-Hua, 2018. "Impact of electricity shortages during energy transitions in Taiwan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 622-632.
    11. Clio Ciaschini & Margherita Carlucci & Francesco Maria Chelli & Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica & Luca Salvati, 2023. "COVID-19 and decreasing consumption: a multisectoral assesment for Italy," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(2), pages 1162-1171.
    12. Robles Teigeiro, Luis & Díaz, Bárbara, 2014. "Estimation of multipliers for the activity of hotels and restaurants," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 27-34.
    13. S Deman, 1991. "Stability of Supply Coefficients and Consistency of Supply-Driven and Demand-Driven Input-Output Models: A Reply," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(12), pages 1811-1817, December.
    14. Xu, Tang & Baosheng, Zhang & Lianyong, Feng & Masri, Marwan & Honarvar, Afshin, 2011. "Economic impacts and challenges of China’s petroleum industry: An input–output analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2905-2911.
    15. López, Luis-Antonio & Tobarra, Maria-Angeles & Cadarso, Maria-Ángeles & Gómez, Nuria & Cazcarro, Ignacio, 2022. "Eating local and in-season fruits and vegetables: Carbon-water-employment trade-offs and synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Xesús Pereira López & Melchor Fernández Fernández & André Carrascal Incera, 2012. "Algunas consideraciones acerca de los modelos input-output rectangulares," Documentos de trabajo - Analise Economica 0049, IDEGA - Instituto Universitario de Estudios e Desenvolvemento de Galicia.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:21:y:1989:i:11:p:1533-1539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.