IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljms/v3i12p3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Classroom Situation: Improving Study Habits of Secondary School Students in Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Kirui Damaris
  • Margaret Oloko

Abstract

Changing consumer perception/lifestyle makes continual market monitoring essential. Since firms must compete in a complex and challenging environment, achieving a competitive advantage is a major concern for the management of clothing retail stores in the competitive and slow growth markets. A firm is said to have competitive advantage when it is implementing a value creating strategy not simultaneously being implemented by any current or potential competitors and when these other firms are unable to duplicate the benefits of this strategy. The aim for competitive advantage is the reason that organizations focus on strategies that are difficult for the competitors to imitate. The study will explore the dynamics of clothing retail arena and how Michael porter’s three generic strategies are used by clothing retailers who operate in Thika town to gain competitive advantage. This is a comparative case study of clothing stores or retailers that are closely located and face similar competition. It will help identify how generic strategies have been adopted and recommend the one that yields the highest competitive advantage. The clothing retailers operate under the same business environment in Thika town and thus have to compete for the same customers thus creating stiff competition among them. The three generic strategies are: cost leadership, differentiation and focus strategy. Cost leadership strategy is concerned with lowering costs consequently lowering the prices of commodities. Strategies related to differentiation are designed to appeal to customers with a special and unique product. A focus strategy on the other hand can be anchored on a low cost base or a differentiation base where the strategy attempts to attend to the needs of a particular market. Descriptive research design will be used and the target population will comprise of the management and employees of the retail stores. Systematic random sampling will then be used to select the sample under study. Data will be collected through the use of questionnaires and the findings analyzed and presented using tables, pie charts, graphs and percentages. The analyzed data will help establish how competitive advantage has been achieved by the clothing retailers through Porters generic strategies. It will identify the specific differentiation, focus and cost leadership strategies that they practice and how the strategies have enabled the stores to remain relevant in the very competitive clothing industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirui Damaris & Margaret Oloko, 2014. "The Classroom Situation: Improving Study Habits of Secondary School Students in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(12), pages 880-885.
    • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v3i12p3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%203_1497345643.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam M. Brandenburger & Harborne W. Stuart, 1996. "Value‐based Business Strategy," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 5-24, March.
    2. Fahy, John, 2002. "A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 57-77, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zemsky, Peter & Adner, Ron, 2003. "Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition," CEPR Discussion Papers 3994, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Mohamed Ali Khaldi, 2016. "Mesure opérationnelle de la valeur partenariale et sa répartition," Post-Print hal-01900615, HAL.
    3. Christoph Grimpe & Katrin Hussinger & Wolfgang Sofka, 2023. "Reaching beyond the acquirer-Target Dyad in M&A – Linkages to External knowledge sources and target firm valuation," DEM Discussion Paper Series 23-01, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    4. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Jeon, Doh-Shin & Menicucci, Domenico, 2009. "Bundling and Competition for Slots: On the Portfolio Effects of Bundling," IDEI Working Papers 574, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse, revised Jul 2011.
    6. Michael Carney, 2005. "Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family–Controlled Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(3), pages 249-265, May.
    7. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    8. Luciana Aparecida Barbieri da Rosa & Clandia Maffini Gomes & Waleska Campos & Carolina Rodrigues & Tais Pentiado Godoy & Jordana Marques Kneipp, 2022. "Influencing Factors of The Innovation Power in the Adoption of Sustainability Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Schmid, Stefan & Schurig, Andreas, 2003. "The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary's business network," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 755-782, December.
    10. Harborne W. Stuart, 2016. "Value Gaps and Profitability," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 56-70, March.
    11. David Gaddis Ross, 2012. "On Evaluation Costs in Strategic Factor Markets: The Implications for Competition and Organizational Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(4), pages 791-804, April.
    12. Victor M. Bennett & Robert Seamans & Feng Zhu, 2015. "Cannibalization and option value effects of secondary markets: Evidence from the US concert industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(11), pages 1599-1614, November.
    13. Wang, Chengqi & Hong, Junjie & Kafouros, Mario & Boateng, Agyenim, 2012. "What drives outward FDI of Chinese firms? Testing the explanatory power of three theoretical frameworks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 425-438.
    14. Palash Deb & Parthiban David & Jonathan O'Brien, 2017. "When is cash good or bad for firm performance?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 436-454, February.
    15. Anoop R. Menon & Dennis A. Yao, 2017. "Elevating Repositioning Costs: Strategy Dynamics and Competitive Interactions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(10), pages 1953-1963, October.
    16. David Besanko & Sachin Gupta & Dipak Jain, 1998. "Logit Demand Estimation Under Competitive Pricing Behavior: An Equilibrium Framework," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1533-1547, November.
    17. Nicolai J. Foss, 2002. "The Strategy and Transaction Cost Nexus Past Debates, Central Questions, and Future Research Possibilities," DRUID Working Papers 02-04, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    18. Bobillo, Alfredo M. & López-Iturriaga, Felix & Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando, 2010. "Firm performance and international diversification: The internal and external competitive advantages," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 607-618, December.
    19. Costa Climent, Ricardo & Haftor, Darek M., 2021. "Business model theory-based prediction of digital technology use: An empirical assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Boguslawa Bek-Gaik & Anna Surowiec, 2022. "The Quality of Business Model Disclosure in Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 3-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljms:v3i12p3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.