IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v14y2020i1p33-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foreign Participation In The Share Capital Of Companies In Romania €“ A Regional Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana SEHLEANU

Abstract

There is a broad consensus in the field literature regarding the positive effects of foreign investments in the economy at the national and regional level. Foreign investments are considered an engine of economic development, a sine qua non condition for the general wellbeeing, especially in countries involved in catching up process. When we refer to regions, we can not overlook the existing disparities. Interregional disparities exist also in terms of foreign investments attracted. In this paper, after presenting some economic indicators that outlined the level of development of the regions, it was conducted an analysis of the distribution and evolution of the the value of subscribed capital and of the number of companies with foreign participation in the share capital registered in Romania, by development regions. During the analyzed period, 2001-2019, there was an upward trend in all the development regions in terms of the value of subscribed capital in companies with foreign participation. However, the difference between the Bucharest-Ilfov region and the rest of the regions is striking. The results showed that Bucharest-Ilfov region attracted the most in what concerns foreign investment. More than half of the foreign participations in the share capital were made in this region. The second position, in terms of the value of subscribed capital, is occupied by the Center region and the third by South-Muntenia region. Regarding the number of registered companies with foreign participation in the share capital, Bucharest-Ilfov region also dominates, being the most desirable region of development for the foreign investors who want to invest in Romania. West and North-West regions are placed on the second, respectively third position. South-West Oltenia development region is placed on the last place, both in terms of the number of companies registered and of the value of subscribed capital. This analysis revealed the major disparity between the Bucharest-Ilfov region and all the other development regions regarding the foreign investments attracted in the form of the participations in the social capital. This gap has accentuated during the last decade, the rhythm of growth being much higher in Bucharest-Ilfov region compared to the other development regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana SEHLEANU, 2020. "Foreign Participation In The Share Capital Of Companies In Romania €“ A Regional Analysis," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 33-42, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:33-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conferinta.management.ase.ro/archives/2020/PDF/1_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gohou, Gaston & Soumaré, Issouf, 2012. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Reduce Poverty in Africa and are There Regional Differences?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 75-95.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8o118937 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Crozet, Matthieu & Mayer, Thierry & Mucchielli, Jean-Louis, 2004. "How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 27-54, January.
    4. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8o118937 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Riccardo Crescenzi & Simona Iammarino, 2017. "Global investments and regional development trajectories: the missing links," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 97-115, January.
    6. Salike, Nimesh, 2016. "Role of human capital on regional distribution of FDI in China: New evidences," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 66-84.
    7. Yibo Bi & Zhiyi Ren & Kun Bao, 2020. "Does distance matter in foreign direct investment sub-national location choice? Evidence from China," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Gutiérrez-Portilla, Paula & Maza, Adolfo & Villaverde, José, 2019. "A spatial approach to the FDI-growth nexus in Spain: Dealing with the headquarters effect," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    9. Saime Kayam & Alexandr Yabrukov & Mehtap Hisarciklilar, 2013. "What Causes the Regional Disparity of FDI in Russia? A Spatial Analysis," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 20(1), pages 63-78, April.
    10. Völlmecke, Dominik & Jindra, Björn & Marek, Philipp, 2016. "FDI, human capital and income convergence—Evidence for European regions," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 288-307.
    11. Michael Getzner & Serhiy Moroz, 2020. "Regional development and foreign direct investment in transition countries: a case-study for regions in Ukraine," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 813-832, July.
    12. Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2005. "The Effects Of Chinese Regional Conditions On The Location Choice Of Japanese Affiliates," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 56(4), pages 390-407, December.
    13. Ki-Dong Lee & Seok-Joon Hwang, 2014. "Regional heterogeneity and location choice of FDI in Korea via agglomeration and linkage relationships," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 464-487, July.
    14. Jacob A. Jordaan, 2008. "State Characteristics and the Locational Choice of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Regional FDI in Mexico 1989–2006," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 389-413, September.
    15. Hongzhong Fan & Shah Muhammad Kamran & Mingliang Li & Qiliang Zhou, 2017. "Congestion costs and differences in the regional distribution of FDI in China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1789-1809, July.
    16. Hejazi, Walid, 2009. "Does China receive more regional FDI than gravity would suggest?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 327-335, October.
    17. Rong, Shu & Liu, Kai & Huang, Si & Zhang, Qi, 2020. "FDI, labor market flexibility and employment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    18. Ledyaeva, Svetlana & Karhunen, Päivi & Kosonen, Riitta, 2013. "Birds of a feather: Evidence on commonality of corruption and democracy in the origin and location of foreign investment in Russian regions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-25.
    19. Crozet, Matthieu & Mayer, Thierry & Mucchielli, Jean-Louis, 2004. "How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 27-54, January.
    20. Villaverde, José & Maza, Adolfo, 2015. "The determinants of inward foreign direct investment: Evidence from the European regions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 209-223.
    21. Andrzej Cieślik, 2005. "Regional characteristics and the location of foreign firms within Poland," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 863-874.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nielsen, Bo Bernhard & Asmussen, Christian Geisler & Weatherall, Cecilie Dohlmann, 2017. "The location choice of foreign direct investments: Empirical evidence and methodological challenges," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 62-82.
    2. Felipe J. Fonseca & Irving Llamosas-Rosas, 2019. "Spatial linkages and third-region effects: evidence from manufacturing FDI in Mexico," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 62(2), pages 265-284, April.
    3. Blanc-Brude, Frédéric & Cookson, Graham & Piesse, Jenifer & Strange, Roger, 2014. "The FDI location decision: Distance and the effects of spatial dependence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 797-810.
    4. Riccardo Crescenzi & Carlo Pietrobelli & Roberta Rabellotti, 2012. "Innovation Drivers, Value Chains and the Geography of Multinational Firms in European Regions," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 53, European Institute, LSE.
    5. Rubini, Lauretta & Pollio, Chiara & Spigarelli, Francesca & Lv, Ping, 2021. "Regional social context and FDI. An empirical investigation on Chinese acquisitions in Europe," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 402-415.
    6. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Gobillon, Laurent, 2015. "The Empirics of Agglomeration Economies," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 247-348, Elsevier.
    7. Jonathan Jones, 2017. "Agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment: A meta-analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 731-757, November.
    8. Veronika Hecht, 2015. "Location choice of German multinationals in the Czech Republic. The importance of agglomeration economies," FIW Working Paper series 159, FIW.
    9. Llamosas-Rosas Irving & Fonseca Felipe J., 2018. "Determinants of FDI Attraction in the Manufacturing Sector in Mexico, 1999-2015," Working Papers 2018-07, Banco de México.
    10. Christian Hilber & Ioan Voicu, 2010. "Agglomeration Economies and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical Evidence from Romania," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 355-371.
    11. Riccardo Crescenzi & Carlo Pietrobelli & Roberta Rabellotti, 2014. "Innovation drivers, value chains and the geography of multinational corporations in Europe," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(6), pages 1053-1086.
    12. Veronika Hecht, 2017. "Location choice of German multinationals in the Czech Republic," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 25(4), pages 593-623, October.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/1kv8mtgl748r0ahh12air9erdc is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Tamás Krisztin & Philipp Piribauer, 2023. "A joint spatial econometric model for regional FDI and output growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(1), pages 87-106, February.
    15. Marie-Line Duboz & Nathalie Kroichvili & Julie Le Gallo, 2019. "What matters most for FDI attraction in services: country or region performance? An empirical analysis of EU for 1997–2012," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(3), pages 601-638, December.
    16. Josep‐Maria Arauzo‐Carod & Daniel Liviano‐Solis & Miguel Manjón‐Antolín, 2010. "Empirical Studies In Industrial Location: An Assessment Of Their Methods And Results," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 685-711, August.
    17. Loles Añón Higón & Alfonso Díez-Minguela, 2021. "Location, Location, Location: Do Universities Matter for Foreign R&D?," Working Papers 2109, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    18. Adolfo Maza & Paula Gutiérrez‐Portilla & José Villaverde, 2020. "On the drivers of UK direct investment in the Spanish regions: A spatial Durbin approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 646-675, June.
    19. Filip De Beule & Dieter Somers & Haiyan Zhang, 2018. "Who Follows Whom? A Location Study of Chinese Private and State-Owned Companies in the European Union," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 43-84, February.
    20. Daniele, Vittorio, 2007. "Criminalità e investimenti esteri. Un’analisi per le province italiane [The effect of organized crime on Foreign Investments. An Empirical Analysis for the Italian Provinces]," MPRA Paper 6417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Philippe Martin & Thierry Mayer & Florian Mayneris, 2008. "Spatial Concentration and Firm-Level Productivity in France," Sciences Po publications 6858, Sciences Po.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:33-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.