IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the Russian Federation within the state programs
[Оценка Эффективности Расходов Субъектов Российской Федерации В Рамках Государственных Программ]

Author

Listed:
  • Afanasiev, Roman (Афанасьев, Роман)

    (Financial Research Institute)

Abstract

Transition to the formulation and execution of regional budgets on the basis of state programs makes it necessary to assess the effectiveness of expenditure under the program approach. The article deals with the definition of the effectiveness of budget spending in the federal regulatory framework and methodological approaches to the assessment of the effectiveness of budget spending. Proposed by generalizing the definition of cost-effectiveness, as it is understood in the federal legislation, and on this basis - method of estimating the efficiency of budget spending in public programs. This technique, in contrast to the methodological approaches represented in the federal regulatory framework, allows to estimate state programs in the dynamics of the entire period of their realization.

Suggested Citation

  • Afanasiev, Roman (Афанасьев, Роман), 2015. "Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the Russian Federation within the state programs [Оценка Эффективности Расходов Субъектов Российской Федерации В Рамках Государственных Программ]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 99-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1561.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Layard,Richard & Glaister,Stephen (ed.), 1994. "Cost-Benefit Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521466745.
    2. Gary Anderson, 2001. "Practical," Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 138, Society for Computational Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samygin, Denis Yu. (Самыгин, Денис) & Kudryavtsev, Alexandr A. (Кудрявцев, Александр), 2018. "Strategic Instruments of State Support Distribution in the Agrarian Sector [Стратегические Инструменты Распределения Господдержки Аграрного Сектора]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 156-175, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glenn Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Chapter 15 (Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis)," Development Discussion Papers 2011-15, JDI Executive Programs.
    2. Giovanni Lombardo & Andrea Mazzocchetti & Irene Rapallo & Nader Tayser & Silvano Cincotti, 2019. "Assessment of the Economic and Social Impact Using SROI: An Application to Sport Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. CLIPICI Emilia & FRANT Florin, 2013. "Cost Benefit Analysis - Tool For Allocation of Financial Resources For Major Projects," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 142-146, May.
    4. Aparicio, Jesus & Tenza-Abril, Antonio & Borg, Malcolm & Galea, John & Candela, Lucila, 2018. "Agricultural irrigation of vine crops from desalinated and brackish groundwater under an economic perspective. A case study in Siġġiewi, Malta," MPRA Paper 92268, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Sep 2018.
    5. Mononen, Petri & Leviäkangas, Pekka & Haapasalo, Harri, 2017. "From internal efficiency to societal benefits – Multi modal transport safety agency's socio-economic impact analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 78-90.
    6. Hillinger Claude, 2003. "The Money Metric, Price and Quantity Aggregation and Welfare Measurement," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-36, July.
    7. Marián Kočner, 2014. "Financial - Accounts View on the Governmental Expenses and the Autonomy Administration in the Conditions of the Slovak Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(6), pages 1537-1543.
    8. Glenn Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Forward, Table of Contents, Preface and Chapter 1 (The Integrated Analysis of Investment Projects)," Development Discussion Papers 2011-01, JDI Executive Programs.
    9. Alcaraz Carrillo de Albornoz, Vicente & Molina Millán, Juan & Lara Galera, Antonio & Muñoz Medina, Belén, 2022. "Road speed limit matters – Are politicians doing the right thing?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. repec:jss:jstsof:06:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Calmet , Denisse & Capurro , Juan Miguel, 2011. "El tiempo es dinero: Cálculo del valor social del tiempo en Lima Metropolitana para usuarios de transporte urbano," Revista Estudios Económicos, Banco Central de Reserva del Perú, issue 20, pages 73-86.
    12. Brenters, J. & Romijn, H.A., 2002. "A sub-sector approach to cost-benefit analysis: Small-scale sisal processing in Tanzania," Working Papers 02.04, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    13. Aysun Uluc, 2011. "An Alternative Method for Measuring Financial Frictions," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, April.
    14. Marco Remondino, 2018. "Information Technology in Healthcare: HHC-MOTES, a Novel Set of Metrics to Analyse IT Sustainability in Different Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Biancardo, Salvatore Antonio & Gesualdi, Michele & Savastano, Davide & Intignano, Mattia & Henke, Ilaria & Pagliara, Francesca, 2023. "An innovative framework for integrating Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) within Building Information Modeling (BIM)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo, 2021. "The Assessment of Density Bonus in Building Renovation Interventions. The Case of the City of Florence in Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Pascal Pluvinet & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Bruno Faivre d'Arcier & Mathieu Gardrat & Pierre Basck & Christian Ambrosini & Jean-Louis Routhier, 2012. "Methodology, evaluation, simulation and assessment for the analysis of the deployment of DSB and EEIC systems of the FREILOT project Contribution of LET," Working Papers halshs-01098999, HAL.
    18. Glen P. Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo, 2006. "Evaluation of the benefits of transnational transportation projects," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 9, pages 1-17, May.
    19. Hamilton, Kirk & Stover, Jana, 2012. "Economic analysis of projects in a greenhouse world," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6117, The World Bank.
    20. Törnquist, Johanna & Gustafsson, Inger, 2004. "Perceived Benefits Of Improved Information Exchange - A Case Study On Rail And Intermodal Transports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 415-440, January.
    21. Blunch, Niels-Hugo, 2013. "Staying Alive: Adult Literacy Programs and Child Mortality in Rural Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 114-126.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    budget Code of the Russian Federation; the regional budget; program budgeting; public programs; cost-effectiveness;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.