IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v8y2004i1p415-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Benefits Of Improved Information Exchange - A Case Study On Rail And Intermodal Transports

Author

Listed:
  • Törnquist, Johanna
  • Gustafsson, Inger

Abstract

The interest in achieving more effective railway freight transports in Europe and increasing the railway's market share, has grown in the past few years. The use of railway is, however, often rather complex in many aspects and needs to become more flexible and reliable if it will be able to compete with other modes of transport. A study was carried out to investigate if and how improved information exchange between the Swedish National Rail Administration, Banverket, and its customers can facilitate the use of Swedish railway freight transports. The primary aim was to identify the customers' needs for improved information exchange as well as to understand how they would benefit from it. The results showed that the accessibility to information has a significant impact on the whole planning process and that there already exists substantial information that will benefit the customers if synthesised and made available.

Suggested Citation

  • Törnquist, Johanna & Gustafsson, Inger, 2004. "Perceived Benefits Of Improved Information Exchange - A Case Study On Rail And Intermodal Transports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 415-440, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:8:y:2004:i:1:p:415-440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739-8859(04)08018-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2002. "The perceived usefulness of different sources of traffic information to trucking operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 97-116, April.
    2. Gary Anderson, 2001. "Practical," Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 138, Society for Computational Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. CLIPICI Emilia & FRANT Florin, 2013. "Cost Benefit Analysis - Tool For Allocation of Financial Resources For Major Projects," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 142-146, May.
    2. Maloni, Michael J. & Jackson, Eric C., 2007. "Stakeholder Contributions to Container Port Capacity: A Survey of Port Authorities," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 46(1).
    3. Glenn Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Forward, Table of Contents, Preface and Chapter 1 (The Integrated Analysis of Investment Projects)," Development Discussion Papers 2011-01, JDI Executive Programs.
    4. Calmet , Denisse & Capurro , Juan Miguel, 2011. "El tiempo es dinero: Cálculo del valor social del tiempo en Lima Metropolitana para usuarios de transporte urbano," Revista Estudios Económicos, Banco Central de Reserva del Perú, issue 20, pages 73-86.
    5. Brenters, J. & Romijn, H.A., 2002. "A sub-sector approach to cost-benefit analysis: Small-scale sisal processing in Tanzania," Working Papers 02.04, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    6. Afanasiev, Roman (Афанасьев, Роман), 2015. "Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the Russian Federation within the state programs [Оценка Эффективности Расходов Субъектов Российской Федерации В Рамках Государственных Программ]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 99-108.
    7. Ali, Irfan, 2016. "The impact of ERP implementation on the financial performance of the firm : An empirical study," Other publications TiSEM 876506f5-1aed-4421-aa2c-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Glenn P. Jenkins & Chun‐Yan Kuo, 2007. "Evaluating the Relative Impact of Fiscal Incentives and Trade Policies on the Returns to Manufacturing in Taiwan, 1955–1995," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 75-100, March.
    9. Purohit, Pallav & Kandpal, Tara Chandra, 2007. "Techno-economics of biogas-based water pumping in India: An attempt to internalize CO2 emissions mitigation and other economic benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 1208-1226, August.
    10. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 2022. "Deployment Paths of ATIS: Impact on Commercial Vehicle Operations, Private Sector Providers and the Public Sector," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2578j4bj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Potapov, Alex & Muirhead, Jim R. & Lele, Subhash R. & Lewis, Mark A., 2011. "Stochastic gravity models for modeling lake invasions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 964-972.
    12. Giuseppe Pennisi & Pasquale L. Scandizzo, 2006. "Economic Evaluation in the age of Uncertainty," CEIS Research Paper 86, Tor Vergata University, CEIS.
    13. Glenn Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo & Arnold C. Harberger, 2011. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investment Decisions: Chapter 15 (Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis)," Development Discussion Papers 2011-15, JDI Executive Programs.
    14. Marián Kočner, 2014. "Financial - Accounts View on the Governmental Expenses and the Autonomy Administration in the Conditions of the Slovak Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 62(6), pages 1537-1543.
    15. repec:jss:jstsof:06:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Aysun Uluc, 2011. "An Alternative Method for Measuring Financial Frictions," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, April.
    17. Glen P. Jenkins & Chun-Yan Kuo, 2006. "Evaluation of the benefits of transnational transportation projects," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 9, pages 1-17, May.
    18. Hamilton, Kirk & Stover, Jana, 2012. "Economic analysis of projects in a greenhouse world," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6117, The World Bank.
    19. Blunch, Niels-Hugo, 2013. "Staying Alive: Adult Literacy Programs and Child Mortality in Rural Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 114-126.
    20. Marie-Josée J. Mangen & G. Ardine de Wit & Arie H. Havelaar, 2007. "Economic analysis of Campylobacter control in the dutch broiler meat chain," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 173-192.
    21. Kalra, Nidhi & Hallegatte, Stephane & Lempert, Robert & Brown, Casey & Fozzard, Adrian & Gill, Stuart & Shah, Ankur, 2014. "Agreeing on robust decisions : new processes for decision making under deep uncertainty," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6906, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:8:y:2004:i:1:p:415-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.