IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rjr/romjef/v5y2008i3p80-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of Critical Control Points Of Alternative Decisions On The Choice Of Performance Based Budgeting System: The Analysis Of The Practices In Turkey’S Public Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Tugen, Kamil

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylul University)

  • Akdeniz, H. Ahmet

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylul University)

  • Egeli, Haluk

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Aksarayli, Mehmet

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Ozen, Ahmet

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

Abstract

Performance-Based Budgeting (PBB) System is one of the latest techniques achieved in the development process of modern budgeting systems. The system basically requires public institutions to prepare budgets in accordance with market-focused administration approach. The system is based on allocating the budget in order to give the most convenient subsidy for the institutional operations to enable the effective use of resources. Institutional activities are assessed according to pre-determined performance criteria and the way to reach the target performance level is called forth. In this study, first, critical control points are determined to enable the state to reach PBB by providing transition between budgeting systems. After critical control points are formed, a diagram is drawn to show the effectiveness of PBB and the factors that may affect the processing of the system negatively or positively are explained. After that, operational levels of institutions according to the critical control points are obtained as the result of a situational analysis of PBB in various public institutions in Turkey. Moreover, public institutions in the study are classified from a functional point of view and comparative analyses are made according to operational levels. Regarding the result of the analyses some suggestions on adapting the PBB systems to the public institutions are made. We concluded that the system cannot be applied effectively without completing all the steps towards PBB.

Suggested Citation

  • Tugen, Kamil & Akdeniz, H. Ahmet & Egeli, Haluk & Aksarayli, Mehmet & Ozen, Ahmet, 2008. "Analysis Of Critical Control Points Of Alternative Decisions On The Choice Of Performance Based Budgeting System: The Analysis Of The Practices In Turkey’S Public Institutions," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 5(3), pages 80-99, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:80-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef3_08/rjef3_08_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresa Curristine, 2006. "Government Performance: Lessons and Challenges," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 127-151.
    2. Jón R. Blöndal, 2001. "Budgeting in Sweden," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 27-57.
    3. Jón R. Blöndal, 2003. "Budget reform in OECD member countries: Common trends," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 2(4), pages 7-25.
    4. -, 2003. "Budget reform in OECD member countries: common trends," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34911, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Blondal, Jon, 2003. "Budget reform in OECD member countries: common trends," Seminarios y Conferencias 6570, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ms. Davina F. Jacobs, 2008. "A Review of Capital Budgeting Practices," IMF Working Papers 2008/160, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Panagiotis Liargovas & Vasilis Pilichos & Anastasia Angelopoulou, 2021. "Fiscal governance and forecasting Bias: a case study of Greece during the economic crisis," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 75-95.
    3. Győrffy, Dóra, 2005. "Az intézményi tényezők szerepe az államháztartási hiány alakulásában Magyarországon [The role of institutional factors in the development of budget deficit in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 755-773.
    4. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2006. "Teilstudie 12: Wachstumsimpulse durch die öffentliche Hand," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 27451, April.
    5. Mara Andreea SÎNTEJUDEANU & Teodora Viorica FARCAS & Adriana TIRON TUDOR, 2014. "Public Sector Transparency:A Conceptual Dissection," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 365-372, July.
    6. Ehrhart, Karl-Martin & Gardner, Roy & von Hagen, Jurgen & Keser, Claudia, 2007. "Budget processes: Theory and experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 279-295, May.
    7. Nolde Nielsen, Kåre & Holm, Petter & Aschan, Michaela, 2015. "Results based management in fisheries: Delegating responsibility to resource users," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 442-451.
    8. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2008. "Gender Budgeting in Austria," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(2), pages 44-51, 07.
    9. Hideaki Tanaka, 2005. "Fiscal Rules and Targets and Public Expenditure Management: Enthusiasm in the 1990's and its Aftermath," Asia Pacific Economic Papers 346, Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    10. Teresa Curristine & Zsuzsanna Lonti & Isabelle Joumard, 2007. "Improving Public Sector Efficiency: Challenges and Opportunities," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 1-41.
    11. John Wanna & Lotte Jensen & Jouke de Vries (ed.), 2010. "The Reality of Budgetary Reform in OECD Nations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2407.
    12. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2008. "Gender Budgeting in Austria," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(02), pages 44-51, July.
    13. John Wanna, 2010. "The Work in Progress of Budgetary Reform," Chapters, in: John Wanna & Lotte Jensen & Jouke de Vries (ed.), The Reality of Budgetary Reform in OECD Nations, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. John M. Kim, 2010. "Korea's Four Major Budgetary Reforms: Catching up with a Big Bang," Chapters, in: John Wanna & Lotte Jensen & Jouke de Vries (ed.), The Reality of Budgetary Reform in OECD Nations, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Győrffy, Dóra, 2006. "Globális kihívások és nemzetgazdasági alkalmazkodás. A gazdaságpolitikai fegyelem intézményesítése Svédországban [Global challenges and international economic adjustment. Institutionalization of ec," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 540-559.
    16. repec:ces:ifodic:v:6:y:2008:i:2:p:14567141 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budgeting; Strategic Planning; Performance Evaluation; Performance Criterion; Performance-based Budgeting; Optimization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:80-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipacaro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.