Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Analysis Of Critical Control Points Of Alternative Decisions On The Choice Of Performance Based Budgeting System: The Analysis Of The Practices In Turkey’S Public Institutions

Contents:

Author Info

  • Tugen, Kamil

    ()
    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylul University)

  • Akdeniz, H. Ahmet

    ()
    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylul University)

  • Egeli, Haluk

    ()
    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Aksarayli, Mehmet

    ()
    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Ozen, Ahmet

    ()
    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Performance-Based Budgeting (PBB) System is one of the latest techniques achieved in the development process of modern budgeting systems. The system basically requires public institutions to prepare budgets in accordance with market-focused administration approach. The system is based on allocating the budget in order to give the most convenient subsidy for the institutional operations to enable the effective use of resources. Institutional activities are assessed according to pre-determined performance criteria and the way to reach the target performance level is called forth. In this study, first, critical control points are determined to enable the state to reach PBB by providing transition between budgeting systems. After critical control points are formed, a diagram is drawn to show the effectiveness of PBB and the factors that may affect the processing of the system negatively or positively are explained. After that, operational levels of institutions according to the critical control points are obtained as the result of a situational analysis of PBB in various public institutions in Turkey. Moreover, public institutions in the study are classified from a functional point of view and comparative analyses are made according to operational levels. Regarding the result of the analyses some suggestions on adapting the PBB systems to the public institutions are made. We concluded that the system cannot be applied effectively without completing all the steps towards PBB.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef3_08/rjef3_08_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Institute for Economic Forecasting in its journal Romanian Journal for Economic Forecasting.

    Volume (Year): 5 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 3 (September)
    Pages: 80-99

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:80-99

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Casa Academiei, Calea 13, Septembrie nr.13, sector 5, Bucureşti 761172
    Phone: 004 021 3188148
    Fax: 004 021 3188148
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ipe.ro/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Budgeting; Strategic Planning; Performance Evaluation; Performance Criterion; Performance-based Budgeting; Optimization;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Teresa Curristine, 2005. "Government Performance: Lessons and Challenges," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 127-151.
    2. Jón R. Blöndal, 2001. "Budgeting in Sweden," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 27-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:80-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Corina Saman).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.