IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rba/rbabul/dec2013-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recovery and Resolution of Central Counterparties

Author

Listed:
  • Matt Gibson

    (Reserve Bank of Australia)

Abstract

The increasing importance of central counterparties (CCPs) to financial stability has prompted regulators to take steps to ensure that critical CCP services can continue in circumstances of financial distress. These steps include ensuring that CCPs have robust plans for recovery to return them to viability, and that authorities have the ability to resolve a CCP if required. This article discusses the key components that are expected to form part of CCPs’ recovery plans, including the power of a CCP to apply ‘haircuts’ to variation margin payments. The article also notes the potential elements that may form part of a resolution regime for CCPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Matt Gibson, 2013. "Recovery and Resolution of Central Counterparties," RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 39-48, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rba:rbabul:dec2013-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2013/dec/pdf/bu-1213-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elliott, David, 2013. "Financial Stability Paper No 20: Central counterparty loss-allocation rules," Bank of England Financial Stability Papers 20, Bank of England.
    2. Rehlon, Amandeep & Nixon, Dan, 2013. "Central counterparties: what are they, why do they matter and how does the Bank supervise them?," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(2), pages 147-156.
    3. John P Jackson & Mark J Manning, 2007. "Comparing the pre-settlement risk implications of alternative clearing arrangements," Bank of England working papers 321, Bank of England.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Louise Carter & Megan Garner, 2015. "Skin in the Game – Central Counterparty Risk Controls and Incentives," RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 79-88, June.
    2. Alexandra Heath & Gerard Kelly & Mark Manning, 2015. "Central Counterparty Loss Allocation and Transmission of Financial Stress," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2015-02, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    3. Rosati, Simonetta & Vacirca, Francesco, 2019. "Interdependencies in the euro area derivatives clearing network: a multi-layer network approach," Working Paper Series 2342, European Central Bank.
    4. James Hansen & Angus Moore, 2016. "The Efficiency of Central Clearing: A Segmented Markets Approach," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2016-07, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    5. Soledad Núñez & Eva Valdeolivas, 2019. "Central clearing counterparties: benefits, costs and risks," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Spring.
    6. Heath, Alexandra & Kelly, Gerard & Manning, Mark & Markose, Sheri & Shaghaghi, Ali Rais, 2016. "CCPs and network stability in OTC derivatives markets," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 217-233.
    7. Mr. Manmohan Singh, 2014. "Limiting Taxpayer "Puts" - An Example from Central Counterparties," IMF Working Papers 2014/203, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Ashwin Clarke & Paul Ryan, 2014. "Non-dealer Clearing of Over-the-counter Derivatives," RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 77-88, March.
    9. Soledad Núñez & Eva Valdeolivas, 2019. "Central clearing counterparties: benefits, costs and risks," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue Spring.
    10. Soledad Núñez & Eva Valdeolivas, 2019. "Central clearing counterparties: benefits, costs and risks," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue MAY.
    11. Mr. Manmohan Singh & Dermot Turing, 2018. "Central Counterparties Resolution—An Unresolved Problem," IMF Working Papers 2018/065, International Monetary Fund.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kubitza, Christian & Pelizzon, Loriana & Getmansky, Mila, 2018. "The pitfalls of central clearing in the presence of systematic risk," ICIR Working Paper Series 31/18, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    2. Rahman, Arshadur, 2015. "Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, central clearing and financial stability," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 55(3), pages 283-294.
    3. Wenqian Huang, 2019. "Central counterparty capitalization and misaligned incentives," BIS Working Papers 767, Bank for International Settlements.
    4. Boissel, Charles & Derrien, François & Ors, Evren & Thesmar, David, 2017. "Systemic risk in clearing houses: Evidence from the European repo market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 511-536.
    5. James Hansen & Angus Moore, 2016. "The Efficiency of Central Clearing: A Segmented Markets Approach," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2016-07, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    6. Neuner, Stefan & Schäfer, Klaus, 2011. "Zentrale Gegenparteien für den außerbörslichen Derivatehandel in der Praxis," Bayreuth Working Papers on Finance, Accounting and Taxation (FAcT-Papers) 2011-02, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Finance and Banking.
    7. Ms. Froukelien Wendt, 2015. "Central Counterparties: Addressing their Too Important to Fail Nature," IMF Working Papers 2015/021, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Ashwin Clarke & Paul Ryan, 2014. "Non-dealer Clearing of Over-the-counter Derivatives," RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 77-88, March.
    9. Jin-Wook Chang, 2019. "Collateralized Debt Networks with Lender Default," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-083, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    10. Darrell Duffie, 2014. "Financial Market Infrastructure: Too Important to Fail," Book Chapters, in: Martin Neil Baily & John B. Taylor (ed.), Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis, chapter 11, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
    11. Garratt, Rodney & Zimmerman, Peter, 2020. "Centralized netting in financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Christian Kubitza & Loriana Pelizzon & Mila Getmansky Sherman, 2021. "Loss Sharing in Central Clearinghouses: Winners and Losers," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 066, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    13. Rehlon, Amandeep & Nixon, Dan, 2013. "Central counterparties: what are they, why do they matter and how does the Bank supervise them?," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(2), pages 147-156.
    14. Gabrielle Demange & Thibaut Piquard, 2021. "On the market structure of central counterparties in the EU," Working Papers halshs-03107812, HAL.
    15. Ivana Ruffini, 2015. "Central Clearing: Risks and Customer Protections," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue Q IV, pages 90-100.
    16. Kahn, Charles M. & Roberds, William, 2009. "Why pay? An introduction to payments economics," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Alexandra Heath & Gerard Kelly & Mark Manning, 2013. "OTC Derivatives Reform: Netting and Networks," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Alexandra Heath & Matthew Lilley & Mark Manning (ed.),Liquidity and Funding Markets, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    18. Liu, Zijun & Quiet, Stephanie & Roth , Benedict, 2015. "Banking sector interconnectedness: what is it, how can we measure it and why does it matter?," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 55(2), pages 130-138.
    19. Julliard, Christian & Pinter, Gabor & Todorov, Karamfil & Yuan, Kathy, 2022. "What drives repo haircuts? Evidence from the UK market," Bank of England working papers 985, Bank of England.
    20. Vincent Bignon & Guillaume Vuillemey, 2020. "The Failure of a Clearinghouse: Empirical Evidence [Counterparty risk externality: centralized versus over-the-counter markets]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 24(1), pages 99-128.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rba:rbabul:dec2013-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Drew (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rbagvau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.