IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/rseijr/v1y2016i3p76-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Adoption Of Euro In Case Of Romania: The Main (Counter) Arguments

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Păun

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

In accordance with Treaties and assumed obligations, Romania should adopt Euro when it is “ready”. As EU-member, there is no possibility to avoid the adoption of Euro, only to postpone on an indefinite time this decision. The decision about the introduction of Euro remains a political one. Romania revised for many times the schedule on this specific matter. Euro, as Romanian Leu, is a fiat currency with legal money characteristics, serving for the same redistributive purpose. Euro Area has the same imperfections as local monetary arrangement. The paper will be focused on the fulfilment of pre-requisites (nominal and real convergence), the existing gap between Romania and Eurozone and the main arguments for adoption and against the adoption of single currency. The central idea of the paper is concentrated around the argument that it is irrelevant to discuss about the advantage of a specific tool for public policy that is the currency, taking into consideration that this tool (the fiat currency) is used to arbitrarily redistribution of resources among economic operators. Without a proper theory of money, all theories defining monetary integration (optimal currency area - OCA theory, convergence theories, Balassa-Samuelson effect) are submitted to be wrong and unrealistic. Therefore, under fiat-money conditions, the adoption of a single currency or not is impossible to be properly analysed and defined.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Păun, 2016. "The Adoption Of Euro In Case Of Romania: The Main (Counter) Arguments," Review of Social and Economic Issues, Romanian-American University, vol. 1(3), pages 76-94, march.
    • Handle: RePEc:rau:rseijr:v:1:y:2016:i:3:p:76-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/rseijr/SP16/RSEI-SP16-A3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Georgeta Ailinca & Camelia Milea, 2015. "Reasons for and against the Early Adoption of the Euro in Romania," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(5), pages 56-66, October.
    2. Frankel, Jeffrey, 2004. "Real Convergence and Euro Adoption in Central and Eastern Europe: Trade and Business Cycle Correlations as Endogenous Criteria for Joining EMU," Working Paper Series rwp04-039, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    3. Irena Vodenska & Lou Chitkushev, 2013. "Impact of Euro Adoption on Emerging European Countries," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 8(1), pages 49-70.
    4. Svitlana Maksymenko, 2015. "The Cost of Euro Adoption in Poland," Working Paper 5779, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
    5. Hubert Gabrisch & Martina Kämpfe, 2013. "The new EU countries and euro adoption," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 48(3), pages 180-186, May.
    6. Andreas Stamate, 2011. "An Economic Interpretation Of Neoclassical Monopoly Theory In The Light Of Austrian School," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(13), pages 1-36.
    7. Carlos A. Carrasco, 2015. "A note on European external imbalances and the euro adoption," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2104-2109.
    8. Gabriel MURSA, 2014. "Euro – Advantages And Disadvantages," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(3), pages 60-67, September.
    9. Muşetescu Radu-Cristian, 2009. "Central Banks’ independence and monetary competition: Why the Euro should grow stronger as compared to the US Dollar," Revista OEconomica, Romanian Society for Economic Science, Revista OEconomica, issue 01, March.
    10. repec:diw:diwfin:diwfin05030 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Georgy Ganev, 2009. "Costs and Benefits of Euro Adoption in Bulgaria," Working Paper / FINESS 5.3, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cohen, Joseph N., 2008. "Managing the Faustian bargain: monetary autonomy in the pursuit of development in Eastern Europe and Latin America," MPRA Paper 22435, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ioannis Tsamourgelis & Persa Paflioti & Thomas Vitsounis, 2013. "Seaports Activity (A)synchronicity, Trade Intensity and Business Cycle Convergence: A Panel Data Analysis," International Journal of Maritime, Trade & Economic Issues (IJMTEI), International Journal of Maritime, Trade & Economic Issues (IJMTEI), vol. 0(1), pages 67-92.
    3. Iwona Maciejczyk-Bujnowicz, 2016. "Foreign trade and the theory of optimum currency areas. Implications for Poland," International Economics, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, issue 13, pages 5-26, March.
    4. Andrea Bonilla‐Bolaños, 2021. "A step further in the theory of regional integration: A look at the South American integration strategy," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 845-873, July.
    5. Zsolt Darvas & György Szapáry, 2008. "Business Cycle Synchronization in the Enlarged EU," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Andreas STAMATE-ȘTEFAN & Iacob MIHAELA & Tudor SMIRNA, 2017. "Inside Dumping Theory: Austrian Perspectives On The Cost Problem," Review of Social and Economic Issues, Romanian-American University, vol. 1(4), pages 44-62, march.
    7. Nadya Yorgova, 2011. "Impacts of and experience with EU membership of the countries of Central, Eastern and South - Eastern Europe. Country study on Bulgaria," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 2, pages 169-188, December.
    8. Gheorghe Savoiu & Marian Siminica, 2016. "Disparities, Discrepancies and Specific Concentration – Diversification Trends in the Group of Central and East European Ex-Socialist Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(43), pages 503-503, August.
    9. repec:ath:journl:tome:34:v:2:y:2014:i:34:p:13-21 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Irena Vodenska & Lou Chitkushev, 2013. "Impact of Euro Adoption on Emerging European Countries," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 8(1), pages 49-70.
    11. Qin, Duo & Tan, Tao, 2009. "How much intraregional exchange rate variability could a currency union remove? The case of ASEAN+3," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1793-1803, October.
    12. Viviana Fernandez & Ali M. Kutan, 2005. "Do Regional Integration Agreements Increase Business-Cycle Convergence? Evidence From APEC and NAFTA," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp765, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    13. Geraldine Dany-Knedlik & Martina Kämpfe & Tobias Knedlik, 2021. "The appropriateness of the macroeconomic imbalance procedure for Central and Eastern European Countries," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 123-139, February.
    14. Carlo Di Giorgio, 2016. "Business Cycle Synchronization of CEECs with the Euro Area: A Regime Switching Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 284-300, March.
    15. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2013:v:39i:1p:69 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Hubert Gabrisch, 2021. "Die prekäre alte Normalität der EU und die Notwendigkeit zur Reform [The EU’s Precarious Old Normal and the Need for Reform]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(10), pages 814-820, October.
    17. Hubert Gabrisch & Lucjan T. Orlowski, 2010. "Interest Rate Convergence in Euro-Candidate Countries: Volatility Dynamics of Sovereign Bond Yields," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 69-85, November.
    18. Michael J. Artis & Jarko Fidrmuc & Johann Scharler, 2008. "The transmission of business cycles Implications for EMU enlargement1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 16(3), pages 559-582, July.
    19. Baldwin, Richard E., 2006. "The euro's trade effects," Working Paper Series 594, European Central Bank.
    20. Inklaar, Robert & Jong-A-Pin, Richard & de Haan, Jakob, 2008. "Trade and business cycle synchronization in OECD countries--A re-examination," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 646-666, May.
    21. Zsolt Darvas & György Szapáry, 2004. "Business Cycle Synchronisation in the Enlarged EU: Comovements in the New and Old Members," MNB Working Papers 2004/1, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary).
    22. Hubert Gabrisch, 2017. "Monetary policy independence reconsidered: evidence from six non-euro members of the European Union," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 567-584, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:rseijr:v:1:y:2016:i:3:p:76-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frrauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.