IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rvofce/ofce_0751-6614_1991_num_38_1_1686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La réforme des structures économiques dans les pays de l'Europe de l'Est

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Bouin
  • Bruno Coquet

Abstract

[fre] Conformément à l'objectif de transition systémique vers l'économie de marché que se sont fixés les gouvernements réformateurs des pays d'Europe de l'Est, et compte tenu des contraintes qui s'imposent à leur action, il est possible de déterminer un certain nombre d'évolutions et de choix auxquels ces gouvernements seront confrontés. Notre propos est ici de dégager la logique purement économique de mise en œuvre des politiques de réformes et de dessiner, un schéma de transformation dynamique des structures économiques. Notre analyse s'applique aux anciens pays socialistes ayant d'ores et déjà adopté d'importantes réformes structurelles, à l'exception toutefois de l'Union soviétique dont la situation particulière appelle des études spécifiques. [eng] Given the objective embraced by the newly elected, reformist governments of Eastern European countries — a systemic transition to a market economy — , and with due regard to the constraints bearing on their actions, it is possible to determine a set of evolutions and choices facing those governments. The purpose of this paper is to stress the purely economic logic that should guide the implementation of reform policies and to sketch a sequence for the dynamic tranformation of economic structures. Our analysis is meant to apply to those formely- socialist countries that have already enacted major structural reforms ; it does not cover the USSR, a case requiring specific analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Bouin & Bruno Coquet, 1991. "La réforme des structures économiques dans les pays de l'Europe de l'Est," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(1), pages 207-226.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1991_num_38_1_1686
    DOI: 10.3406/ofce.1991.1686
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1991.1686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ofce.1991.1686
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_1991_num_38_1_1686
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ofce.1991.1686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George A. Akerlof & Andrew K. Rose & Janet L. Yellen & Helga Hessenius, 1991. "East Germany in from the Cold: The Economic Aftermath of Currency Union," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 22(1), pages 1-106.
    2. Kornai, Janos, 1990. "The Affinity between Ownership Forms and Coordination Mechanisms: The Common Experience of Reform in Socialist Countries," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 131-147, Summer.
    3. János Kornai & Aleksandar M. Vacić & Pekka Sutela & Don Patinkin, 1990. "The Affinity Between Ownership and Coordination Mechanisms: The Common Experience of Reform in Socialist Countries," International Economic Association Series, in: Oleg T. Bogomolov (ed.), Market Forces in Planned Economies, chapter 3, pages 32-73, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Roland, Gerard & Verdier, Thierry, 1994. "Privatization in Eastern Europe : Irreversibility and critical mass effects," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 161-183, June.
    5. David Lipton & Jeffrey Sachs, 1990. "Privitization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 21(2), pages 293-342.
    6. Philippe Aghion & Irena Grosfeld & Patrick Bolton & Jean Tirole, 1990. "De la désétatisation en Europe de l'Est," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 195-213.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2021. "Introduction: a special issue in honoring Janos Kornai," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 187(1), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Xia, Tianjiao & Liu, Xiaohui, 2022. "The innovation paradox of TMT political capital in transition economy firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 775-790.
    3. Xu, Cheng-Gang & Guo, Di & Huang, Haizhou & Jiang, Kun, 2020. "Disruptive Innovation and R&D Ownership Structures of the Firm," CEPR Discussion Papers 14861, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. A. Marcincin & S. van Wijnbergen, 1997. "The Impact of Czech Privatisation Methods on Enterprise Performance Incorporating Initial Selection Bias Correction," CERT Discussion Papers 9704, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    5. Allan M Williams & Vladimir Baláž, 2000. "Privatisation and the Development of Tourism in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: Property Rights, Firm Performance, and Recombinant Property," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(4), pages 715-734, April.
    6. Johnson, Simon & Islamov, Bakhtior, "undated". "Property Rights and Economic Reform in Uzbekistan," WIDER Working Papers 295626, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Valentina Vučković & Ružica Šimić Banović & Martina Basarac Sertić, 2021. "Governance Trends among New EU Member States: Is There Institutional Convergence?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Maria Csanadi, 2011. "Varieties of System Transformations and Their Structural Background Based on the IPS Model," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 33-63, March.
    9. Peter Murrell, 1991. "Can Neoclassical Economics Underpin the Reform of Centrally Planned Economies?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 59-76, Fall.
    10. Tian, Xiaowen, 2001. "Privatization and economic performance: evidence from Chinese provinces," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 65-77, March.
    11. Szerb, László & Kocsis-Kisantal, Orsolya, 2008. "Vállalkozói kultúra Magyarországon két napilap tükrében [Corporate culture in Hungary seen through two daily newspapers]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 243-261.
    12. Sascha O. Becker & Lukas Mergele & Ludger Woessmann, 2020. "The Separation and Reunification of Germany: Rethinking a Natural Experiment Interpretation of the Enduring Effects of Communism," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 143-171, Spring.
    13. Agarwal, Jamuna Prasad & Nunnenkamp, Peter, 1992. "Methods and sequencing of privatization: what post-socialist countries can learn from Chile," Kiel Working Papers 527, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Agnès Bénassy-Quéré & Pierre Villa, 1994. "La réunification allemande du point de vue de la politique économique," Working Papers 1994-09, CEPII research center.
    15. Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & André Diegmann & Nicolas Serrano-Velarde, 2023. "Committing to Grow: Privatizations and Firm Dynamics in East Germany," Working Papers 685, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    16. Zbigniew Polański, 1992. "The financial system in post-communist countries: the Polish lessons," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 27(6), pages 261-268, November.
    17. Benno Torgler, 2003. "Tax Morale in Transition Countries," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 357-381.
    18. Rudiger Ahrend & Carlos Winograd, 2006. "The political economy of mass privatisation and imperfect taxation: Winners and loosers," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    19. Alan B. Krueger & Jorn-Steffen Pischke, 1995. "A Comparative Analysis of East and West German Labor Markets: Before and After Unification," NBER Chapters, in: Differences and Changes in Wage Structures, pages 405-446, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Gerling, Katja, 1998. "Transfers and transition: The impact of government support on factor demand and production in Eastern Germany," Kiel Working Papers 878, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1991_num_38_1_1686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.