IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recensements européens : mouvements centrifuges et forces de rappel

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Festy
  • Nathalie Le Bouteillec

Abstract

[fre] En abandonnant la forme traditionnelle du recensement exhaustif périodique au tournant des années 2000, la France et l’Insee participent à un mouvement général en Europe de réforme des modalités de réalisation du recensement de la population, en particulier au cours de la dernière décennie. Certains pays donnent un rôle aux registres de population, d’autres aux sondages, alors que d’autres encore maintiennent une forme classique. S’y ajoute une multiplication des modes de recueil de l’information auprès des individus et des ménages. À cette diversité des modes de collecte au sein de l’espace européen viennent s’ajouter enfin des choix sensiblement différents dans les thèmes abordés au cours des recensements et dans la forme donnée aux interrogations sur ces sujets. . Faut‑il donc abandonner l’espoir d’établir une carte cohérente de la population européenne et de ses principales caractéristiques ? La réponse de l’Union européenne et d’Eurostat consiste à laisser les pays libres du choix de leurs procédures, à condition que celles‑ci respectent un certain nombre de concepts essentiels, afin que des résultats comparables puissent être produits dans les différents pays (règlement du 9 juillet 2008). Cette conciliation entre diversité des modalités et harmonie des résultats s’inscrit dans la perspective ouverte depuis une cinquantaine d’années par l’élaboration de recommandations par les Nations Unies puis la Conférence des statisticiens européens. Le Census Hub inauguré en 2014 en est aujourd’hui la forme aboutie.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Festy & Nathalie Le Bouteillec, 2016. "Recensements européens : mouvements centrifuges et forces de rappel," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 483(1), pages 259-284.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2016.10683
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2016.10683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2016.10683
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2016.10683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Black & Gary Gates & Seth Sanders & Lowell Taylor, 2000. "Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(2), pages 139-154, May.
    2. Jean-Pierre Courson, 1982. "Les ménages n'auront plus de chef," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 149(1), pages 47-55.
    3. Patrick Festy, 2007. "Numbering same-sex couples in censuses and population registers," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(12), pages 339-368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Kolk & Gunnar Andersson, 2020. "Two Decades of Same-Sex Marriage in Sweden: A Demographic Account of Developments in Marriage, Childbearing, and Divorce," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(1), pages 147-169, February.
    2. Sansone, Dario, 2019. "Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Kristensen, Frederikke Frehr & Sharp, Paul, 2021. "Disease Surveillance, Mortality and Race: The Case of HIV/AIDS in the United States," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 553, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Weichselbaumer, Doris, 2003. "Sexual orientation discrimination in hiring," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 629-642, December.
    5. Christopher S. Carpenter, 2005. "Self-Reported Sexual Orientation and Earnings: Evidence from California," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 58(2), pages 258-273, January.
    6. Kate Prickett & Alexa Martin-Storey & Robert Crosnoe, 2015. "A Research Note on Time With Children in Different- and Same-Sex Two-Parent Families," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(3), pages 905-918, June.
    7. James Alm & J. Sebastian Leguizamon & Susane Leguizamon, 2014. "Revisiting the Income Tax Effects of Legalizing Same‐Sex Marriages," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 263-289, March.
    8. Josef Montag, 2015. "What Drives the Gender Gap? An Analysis Using Sexual Orientation," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 577-608, November.
    9. Christopher S. Carpenter & Gilbert Gonzales Jr. & Tara McKay & Dario Sansone, 2020. "Effects of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Mandate on Health Insurance Coverage for Individuals in Same-Sex Couples," NBER Working Papers 26978, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Charles Strohm & Judith Seltzer & Susan Cochran & Vickie Mays, 2009. ""Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(7), pages 177-214.
    11. Nasser Daneshvary & C. Waddoups & Bradley Wimmer, 2008. "Educational Attainment and the Lesbian Wage Premium," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 365-379, December.
    12. Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Carpenter, Christopher S. & Frank, Jeff & Huffman, Matt L., 2019. "Gay glass ceilings: Sexual orientation and workplace authority in the UK," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 167-180.
    13. Schneebaum, Alyssa & Schubert, Nina, 2017. "Marriage (In)equality: Does the Sexual Orientation Wage Gap Persist Across Marital Status?," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 254, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    14. Reagan Baughman & Stacy Dickert-Conlin & Scott Houser, 2002. "How well can we track cohabitation using the sipp? A consideration of direct and inferred measures," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 39(3), pages 455-465, August.
    15. Gunnar Andersson & Turid Noack & Ane Seierstad & Harald Weedon-Fekjær, 2004. "The demographics of same-sex „marriages“ in Norway and Sweden," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2004-018, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    16. Christafore, David & Leguizamon, Susane, 2012. "The influence of gay and lesbian coupled households on house prices in conservative and liberal neighborhoods," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 258-267.
    17. Michael J Smart & Andrew H Whittemore, 2017. "There goes the gaybourhood? Dispersion and clustering in a gay and lesbian real estate market in Dallas TX, 1986–2012," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(3), pages 600-615, February.
    18. Kühne Simon & Kroh Martin & Richter David, 2019. "Comparing Self-Reported and Partnership-Inferred Sexual Orientation in Household Surveys," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(4), pages 777-805, December.
    19. Christine Schwartz & Nikki Graf, 2009. "Assortative matching among same-sex and different-sex couples in the United States, 1990-2000," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(28), pages 843-878.
    20. Karen Leppel, 2014. "Does Job Satisfaction Vary with Sexual Orientation?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 169-198, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.