IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1990_num_229_1_5416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les deux visages de la concentration industrielle : efficacité et rente de situation

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Amar
  • Bruno Crépon

Abstract

[fre] Depuis le début des années quatre-vingt, la concentration industrielle s'est nettement renforcée. . Aujourd'hui, la concentration est synonyme d'une plus grande ouverture sur l'extérieur, d'une plus forte intensité capitalistique, d'un effort de recherche plus important et d'une meilleure qualification des salariés. En bref, la . concentration dynamise les performances industrielles. Certes, les groupes des secteurs les plus concentrés dégagent les marges les plus élevées. Mais ces rentes de situation sont doublement limitées. D'une part, elles sont attractives et favorisent ainsi une certaine déconcentration. D'autre part, l'internationalisation des marchés inhérente au processus de concentration tend à les réduire. [eng] The Two Aspects of Industrial Concentration : Efficiency and Situational Rent - Since the early eighties, industrial concentration has noticeably intensified. . Nowadays, industrial concentration is synonymous with greater access to foreign markets, a higher capital intentity, more efforts devoted to research and better-qualified wage-earners. In short, concentration boosts industrial performance. . Of course, groups belonging to the most concentrated sectors draw the highest margins. But the situational rents are limited in two ways. On the one hand, because they are attractive, they favor some kind of déconcentration. On the other hand, the internationalization of the markets inherent in the combining process tends to reduce situational rents. [spa] Las dos caras de la concentración industrial: eficacidad y renta de situación - . el inicio de los años ochenta, la concentración industrial se reforzó considerablemente. Hoy en día, la concentración surge como sinónimo de una mayor apertura hacia el exterior, de una intensidad capitahsta más fuerte, de un esfuerzo de investigación más importante y de una mejor calificación de los asalariados. En resumen, la concentración dinamiza los buenos resultados industrials. Ciertamente, en los grupos de los sectores de mayor concentración se desprenden las márgenes de ganancias más elevadas. Pero esas rentas de situación son doblemente limitadas. Por una parte, son atractivas, favoreciendo de ese modo, una cierta desconcentración. Por otra parte, la internacionalización de los mercados, inherente al proceso de concentración, tiene tendencia a reducirlas.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Amar & Bruno Crépon, 1990. "Les deux visages de la concentration industrielle : efficacité et rente de situation," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 229(1), pages 5-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1990_num_229_1_5416
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1990.5416
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1990.5416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1990.5416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1990_num_229_1_5416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1990.5416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianluigi Alzona, 1989. "Logiques d'implantation sectorielle des groupes de sociétés : une comparaison Italie-France," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(1), pages 151-164.
    2. de Ghellinck, Elisabeth & Geroski, Paul A & Jacquemin, Alexis, 1988. "Inter-industry Variations in the Effect of Trade on Industry Performance," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-19, September.
    3. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 2.
    4. Encaoua, David & Jacquemin, Alexis, 1982. "Organizational efficiency and monopoly power : The case of French industrial groups," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 25-51.
    5. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    6. Schmalensee, Richard, 1989. "Inter-industry studies of structure and performance," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 16, pages 951-1009, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Co, Catherine Y., 2001. "Trade, foreign direct investment and industry performance," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 163-183, January.
    2. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    3. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    4. Ghosal, Vivek, 2007. "Small is Beautiful but Size Matters: The Asymmetric Impact of Uncertainty and Sunk Costs on Small and Large Businesses," MPRA Paper 5461, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Martin Gaynor, "undated". "What Do We Know About Competition and Quality in Health Care Markets?," GSIA Working Papers 2006-E62, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    6. Mark L.J. Wright & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, 2004. "Firm Size Dynamics in the Aggregate Economy," 2004 Meeting Papers 878, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    7. Derek Bosworth & Joanne Loundes, 2002. "The Dynamic Performance of Australian Enterprises," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2002n03, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    8. Marcelo Resende, 2009. "Concentration and market size: lower bound estimates for the Brazilian industry," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(3), pages 2465-2471.
    9. Sascha A. Weber & Sven M. Anders, 2007. "Price rigidity and market power in German retailing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(7), pages 737-749.
    10. Nillesen, P.H.L., 2008. "The future of electricity distribution regulation : Lessons from international experience," Other publications TiSEM e80aca08-4ccd-4b06-99c0-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Livat, Florine & Remaud, Hervé, 2016. "Factors Impacting Wine Price Mark-Ups in Restaurants," Working Papers 234639, American Association of Wine Economists.
    12. Christian Schwens & Marcus Wagner, 2019. "The role of firm-internal corporate environmental standards for organizational performance," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 823-843, September.
    13. Joachim Wagner, 2014. "Exports and firm profitability: Quality matters!," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 1644-1652.
    14. Connor, John M & Peterson, Everett B, 1992. "Market-Structure Determinants of National Brand-Private Label Price Differences of Manufactured Food Products," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 157-171, June.
    15. Farrell Joseph & Shapiro Carl, 2010. "Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, March.
    16. Catherine A. Durham, 1991. "The Empirical Analysis of Oligopsony in Agricultural Markets: Residual Supply Estimation in California's Processing Tomato Market," Food Marketing Policy Center Research Reports 015, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
    17. Lars-Hendrik Röller & Johan Stennek & Frank Verboven, 2006. "Efficiency Gains from Mergers," Chapters, in: Fabienne IIzkovitz & Roderick Meiklejohn (ed.), European Merger Control, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Nair-Reichert, Usha & Pomery, John, 1999. "International R&D rivalry and export market shares of unionized industries: Some evidence from the US manufacturing sector," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 77-97, October.
    19. Catherine Matraves & Laura Rondi, 2007. "Product Differentiation, Industry Concentration and Market Share Turbulence," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 37-57.
    20. Patel, Pankaj C. & João Guedes, Maria & Pagano, Michael S. & Olson, Gerard T., 2020. "Industry profitability matters: The value of sustainable growth rate and distance from bankruptcy as enablers of venture survival," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 80-92.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1990_num_229_1_5416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.