IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/caecpo/cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intérêts et limites de la notion de règle chez Hayek : Un éclairage par la comparaison avec l'économie des conventions

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Richebé

Abstract

[fre] Hayek et l'école de "l'économie des conventions", malgré des positions divergentes en philosophie sociale, font une critique comparable de la théorie du choix rationnel néoclassique. Il s'appuient aussi sur des hypothèses similaires quant à la nature des processus cognitifs à l'œuvre dans la coordination économique. La notion de règle est au cœur de leurs analyses. Cet article vise à montrer les points communs, les divergences et les limites des analyses des règles proposées par ces auteurs. [eng] Hayek and the french school of "economics of conventions" have diverging positions on social philosophy. Nevertheless, they share similar critics with regard to the neo-classical rational choice theory. They also have in common close hypothesis regarding cognitive processes underlying the economic and social co-ordination. The concept of rule is at the heart of their analysis. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the commonalties, divergences as well as the limits of their respective analysis concerning the rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Richebé, 2000. "Intérêts et limites de la notion de règle chez Hayek : Un éclairage par la comparaison avec l'économie des conventions," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(1), pages 71-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1274
    DOI: 10.3406/cep.2000.1274
    Note: DOI:10.3406/cep.2000.1274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/cep.2000.1274
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1274
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/cep.2000.1274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Favereau, 1989. "Marchés internes, marchés externes," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 273-328.
    2. Milton Friedman & L. J. Savage, 1948. "The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 279-279.
    3. Olivier Favereau, 1999. "Salaire, emploi et économie des conventions," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 163-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herve Charmettant & Michel Rocca, 2010. "20 ans après, que reste-t-il de l'économie des conventions ? Points de départ pour une contribution à un institutionnalisme unifié," Post-Print halshs-00723399, HAL.
    2. Heineck, Guido & Süssmuth, Bernd, 2013. "A different look at Lenin’s legacy: Social capital and risk taking in the Two Germanies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 789-803.
    3. Edi Karni & Philippe Mongin, 2000. "On the Determination of Subjective Probability by Choices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 233-248, February.
    4. Christian Johnson & George G Kaufman, 2007. "Un banco, con cualquier otro nombre…," Boletín, CEMLA, vol. 0(4), pages 185-199, Octubre-d.
    5. Chateauneuf, Alain & Eichberger, Jurgen & Grant, Simon, 2007. "Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 538-567, November.
    6. Nicholas Barberis, 2012. "A Model of Casino Gambling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 35-51, January.
    7. Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2013. "Risk-averse and Risk-seeking Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2013-31, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico, revised Aug 2013.
    8. Eeckhoudt, Louis & Schlesinger, Harris, 2008. "Changes in risk and the demand for saving," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 1329-1336, October.
    9. Martin Kukuk & Stefan Winter, 2008. "An Alternative Explanation of the Favorite-Longshot Bias," Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 2(2), pages 79-96, September.
    10. Moshe Levy & Haim Levy, 2013. "Prospect Theory: Much Ado About Nothing?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 7, pages 129-144, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Evgeny Kagan & Alexander Rybalov, 2022. "Subjective Trusts and Prospects: Some Practical Remarks on Decision Making with Imperfect Information," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Michel M. Denuit & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2010. "A General Index of Absolute Risk Attitude," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 712-715, April.
    13. Egozcue, Martín & García, Luis Fuentes & Wong, Wing-Keung & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2011. "Do investors like to diversify? A study of Markowitz preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 188-193, November.
    14. Brad Taylor, 2013. "Analytic radicalism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 166-172, June.
    15. Mario Alejandro Acosta R., 2014. "Las acciones como activo de reserva para el Banco de la República," Documentos CEDE 11004, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    16. Coates, Dennis & Humphreys, Brad, 2011. "Game Attendance and Competitive Balance in the National Hockey League," Working Papers 2011-8, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    17. Martin, Vincent, 2017. "When to quit: Narrow bracketing and reference dependence in taxi drivers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 166-187.
    18. Arvanitis, Stelios & Scaillet, Olivier & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2020. "Spanning tests for Markowitz stochastic dominance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 291-311.
    19. Sophie Bejean, 1997. "The foundations of the new theories in health economics [Les fondements des nouvelles théories en économie de la santé]," Working Papers hal-01526956, HAL.
    20. Bachar FAKHRY, 2016. "A Literature Review of the Efficient Market Hypothesis," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 431-442, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_2000_num_36_1_1274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/cep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.