IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China-Pakistan economic corridor and its impact on rural development and human life sustainability. Observations from rural women

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Saad
  • Mariah Ijaz
  • Muhammad Usman Asghar
  • Liu Yamin

Abstract

China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has become a “game-changer” not only for policymakers but also for common citizens of China and Pakistan because of its potential benefits in the economic prosperity and sustainable development in the lives of individuals. Recently, scholars have shown a great interest in researching the eminence of CPEC. Despite prodigious efforts of scholars, the question “how CPEC would influence living standards of rural women and what they perceive?” has been remained unanswered. The present study is the first attempt to unearth the perceptions of rural areas’ women towards CPEC. We collected empirical evidence through a structured questionnaire from 302 educated rural women and interviewing 32 uneducated rural women. The following major conclusions are drawn through structural equation modeling via AMOS 21: the rural women significantly directly perceive new opportunities through CPEC; however, they perceive that the CPEC would not directly influence their quality of life and self-enhancement, but through the development of these rural areas. Rural development partially mediates the relationship between CPEC development and perceived opportunities while it fully mediates the relationships between CPEC development and quality of life as well as between CPEC development and self-enhancement. Policymakers need to emphasize on development of rural areas that would improve living standards of poor communities. The government needs to meet the expectations of poor communities and rural women to ensure their sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Saad & Mariah Ijaz & Muhammad Usman Asghar & Liu Yamin, 2020. "China-Pakistan economic corridor and its impact on rural development and human life sustainability. Observations from rural women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239546
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239546
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239546&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Sher & Saman Mazhar & Azhar Abbas & Muhammad Amjed Iqbal & Xiangmei Li, 2019. "Linking Entrepreneurial Skills and Opportunity Recognition with Improved Food Distribution in the Context of the CPEC: A Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Sorrell, Steve, 2015. "Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 74-82.
    3. Martin Melecky & Mark Roberts & Siddharth Sharma, 2019. "The wider economic benefits of transport corridors: a policy framework and illustrative application to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(1), pages 17-44.
    4. Zhe Sun & Kumar Jai & Liang Zhao, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability of Local Community: A Case Study of the Transnational Project in China-Pakistan Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehtab Begum Siddiqui & Maryam Khokhar & Tayyaba Rafique Makhdoom & Md Billal Hossain & Sarmad Ejaz & Faisal Ejaz & Anna Dunay, 2023. "The Impact of Pak and China Cultural influences on CPEC Energy Project Moderating effect in South Asia: A Case Study from Pakistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 211-219, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Saad & Guan Xinping & Mariah Ijaz, 2019. "China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Its Influence on Perceived Economic and Social Goals: Implications for Social Policy Makers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Mehtab Begum Siddiqui & Maryam Khokhar & Tayyaba Rafique Makhdoom & Md Billal Hossain & Sarmad Ejaz & Faisal Ejaz & Anna Dunay, 2023. "The Impact of Pak and China Cultural influences on CPEC Energy Project Moderating effect in South Asia: A Case Study from Pakistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 211-219, November.
    3. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Malayaranjan Sahoo & Narayan Sethi, 2022. "The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: evidence from newly industrialized countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4244-4277, March.
    6. Tozzi, Peter & Jo, Jin Ho, 2017. "A comparative analysis of renewable energy simulation tools: Performance simulation model vs. system optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 390-398.
    7. Ikutegbe, Charles A. & Farid, Mohammed M., 2020. "Application of phase change material foam composites in the built environment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Jan Wrana & Wojciech Struzik & Bartłomiej Kwiatkowski & Piotr Gleń, 2022. "Release of Energy from Groundwater/with Reduction in CO 2 Emissions of More Than 50% from HVAC in the Extension and Revitalization of the Former Palace of the Sobieski Family in Lublin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-11, September.
    9. Martín Lallana & Adrián Almazán & Alicia Valero & Ángel Lareo, 2021. "Assessing Energy Descent Scenarios for the Ecological Transition in Spain 2020–2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    10. Shiqi Zhang & Tianwei Sun & Yuan Lu, 2023. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Tourists’ Risk Perceptions: Tourism Policies’ Mediating Role in Sustainable and Resilient Recovery in the New Normal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Carmen de la Cruz-Lovera & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno & José Luis de la Cruz-Fernández & Francisco G. Montoya & Alfredo Alcayde & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2019. "Analysis of Research Topics and Scientific Collaborations in Energy Saving Using Bibliometric Techniques and Community Detection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Fabíola Sostmeyer Polita & Lívia Madureira, 2021. "Transition Pathways of Agroecological Innovation in Portugal’s Douro Wine Region. A Multi-Level Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Saqib Ali & Habib Ullah & Minhas Akbar & Waheed Akhtar & Hasan Zahid, 2019. "Determinants of Consumer Intentions to Purchase Energy-Saving Household Products in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Kang, Jijun & Yu, Chenyang & Xue, Rui & Yang, Dong & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Can regional integration narrow city-level energy efficiency gap in China?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Bobrova, Yekatherina & Papachristos, George & Chiu, Lai Fong, 2021. "Homeowner low carbon retrofits: Implications for future UK policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Marcondes dos Santos, Herivelto Tiago & Perrella Balestieri, José Antônio, 2018. "Spatial analysis of sustainable development goals: A correlation between socioeconomic variables and electricity use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 367-376.
    17. Darvish Falehi, Ali, 2020. "An innovative optimal RPO-FOSMC based on multi-objective grasshopper optimization algorithm for DFIG-based wind turbine to augment MPPT and FRT capabilities," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Liu, Yang & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2023. "Assessing energy vulnerability and its impact on carbon emissions: A global case," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, 2018. "The Case for a New Discipline: Technosphere Science," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 212-225.
    20. Muhammad Wasif Hanif & Shakir Hafeez & Syed Afzal Moshadi Shah & Naveed Iqbal, 2021. "Domestic Consumer Awareness of Energy Consumption Practices in Pakistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 581-592.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.