IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0008520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parameter Identifiability and Redundancy in a General Class of Stochastic Carcinogenesis Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mark P Little
  • Wolfgang F Heidenreich
  • Guangquan Li

Abstract

Background: Heidenreich et al. (Risk Anal 1997 17 391–399) considered parameter identifiability in the context of the two-mutation cancer model and demonstrated that combinations of all but two of the model parameters are identifiable. We consider the problem of identifiability in the recently developed carcinogenesis models of Little and Wright (Math Biosci 2003 183 111–134) and Little et al. (J Theoret Biol 2008 254 229–238). These models, which incorporate genomic instability, generalize a large number of other quasi-biological cancer models, in particular those of Armitage and Doll (Br J Cancer 1954 8 1–12), the two-mutation model (Moolgavkar et al. Math Biosci 1979 47 55–77), the generalized multistage model of Little (Biometrics 1995 51 1278–1291), and a recently developed cancer model of Nowak et al. (PNAS 2002 99 16226–16231). Methodology/Principal Findings: We show that in the simpler model proposed by Little and Wright (Math Biosci 2003 183 111–134) the number of identifiable combinations of parameters is at most two less than the number of biological parameters, thereby generalizing previous results of Heidenreich et al. (Risk Anal 1997 17 391–399) for the two-mutation model. For the more general model of Little et al. (J Theoret Biol 2008 254 229–238) the number of identifiable combinations of parameters is at most less than the number of biological parameters, where is the number of destabilization types, thereby also generalizing all these results. Numerical evaluations suggest that these bounds are sharp. We also identify particular combinations of identifiable parameters. Conclusions/Significance: We have shown that the previous results on parameter identifiability can be generalized to much larger classes of quasi-biological carcinogenesis model, and also identify particular combinations of identifiable parameters. These results are of theoretical interest, but also of practical significance to anyone attempting to estimate parameters for this large class of cancer models.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark P Little & Wolfgang F Heidenreich & Guangquan Li, 2009. "Parameter Identifiability and Redundancy in a General Class of Stochastic Carcinogenesis Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008520
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008520
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008520&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0008520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang F. Heidenreich & E. Georg Luebeck & Suresh H. Moolgavkar, 1997. "Some Properties of the Hazard Function of the Two‐Mutation Clonal Expansion Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 391-399, June.
    2. Rothenberg, Thomas J, 1971. "Identification in Parametric Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(3), pages 577-591, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew F. Brouwer & Rafael Meza & Marisa C. Eisenberg, 2017. "A Systematic Approach to Determining the Identifiability of Multistage Carcinogenesis Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(7), pages 1375-1387, July.
    2. J. W. Smith & L. R. Johnson & R. Q. Thomas, 2023. "Assessing Ecosystem State Space Models: Identifiability and Estimation," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(3), pages 442-465, September.
    3. Andrew F Brouwer & Rafael Meza & Marisa C Eisenberg, 2017. "Parameter estimation for multistage clonal expansion models from cancer incidence data: A practical identifiability analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Suresh H. Moolgavkar & Ellen T. Chang & Georg Luebeck & Edmund C. Lau & Heather N. Watson & Kenny S. Crump & Paolo Boffetta & Roger McClellan, 2015. "Diesel Engine Exhaust and Lung Cancer Mortality: Time‐Related Factors in Exposure and Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 663-675, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguimkeu, Pierre & Denteh, Augustine & Tchernis, Rusty, 2019. "On the estimation of treatment effects with endogenous misreporting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 487-506.
    2. Kocięcki, Andrzej & Kolasa, Marcin, 2023. "A solution to the global identification problem in DSGE models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 236(2).
    3. Carvalho Lopes, Celia Mendes & Bolfarine, Heleno, 2012. "Random effects in promotion time cure rate models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 75-87, January.
    4. Neusser, Klaus, 2016. "A topological view on the identification of structural vector autoregressions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 107-111.
    5. Orazio Attanasio & Sarah Cattan & Emla Fitzsimons & Costas Meghir & Marta Rubio-Codina, 2020. "Estimating the Production Function for Human Capital: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Colombia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(1), pages 48-85, January.
    6. Chrysanthos Dellarocas & Charles A. Wood, 2008. "The Sound of Silence in Online Feedback: Estimating Trading Risks in the Presence of Reporting Bias," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 460-476, March.
    7. Xiaohong Chen & Victor Chernozhukov & Sokbae Lee & Whitney K. Newey, 2014. "Local Identification of Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 785-809, March.
    8. Naimoli, Antonio & Storti, Giuseppe, 2019. "Heterogeneous component multiplicative error models for forecasting trading volumes," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1332-1355.
    9. Daeyoung Kim & Bruce Lindsay, 2015. "Empirical identifiability in finite mixture models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(4), pages 745-772, August.
    10. Andrew Chesher & Adam Rosen, 2015. "Characterizations of identified sets delivered by structural econometric models," CeMMAP working papers 63/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    11. Zirogiannis, Nikolaos & Tripodis, Yorghos, 2013. "A Generalized Dynamic Factor Model for Panel Data: Estimation with a Two-Cycle Conditional Expectation-Maximization Algorithm," Working Paper Series 142752, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics.
    12. Gary Koop & M. Hashem Pesaran & Ron P. Smith, 2013. "On Identification of Bayesian DSGE Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 300-314, July.
    13. Abadir, Karim M. & Distaso, Walter, 2007. "Testing joint hypotheses when one of the alternatives is one-sided," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 695-718, October.
    14. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin, 2002. "Long-Run Structural Modelling," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 49-87.
    15. Juan Carlos Parra-Alvarez & Olaf Posch & Mu-Chun Wang, 2017. "Estimation of Heterogeneous Agent Models: A Likelihood Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 6717, CESifo.
    16. Luis Alvarez & Cristine Pinto & Vladimir Ponczek, 2022. "Homophily in preferences or meetings? Identifying and estimating an iterative network formation model," Papers 2201.06694, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    17. Matthew Read, 2023. "Estimating the Effects of Monetary Policy in Australia Using Sign‐restricted Structural Vector Autoregressions," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 99(326), pages 329-358, September.
    18. Tito Belchior Silva Moreira & Benjamin Miranda Tabak & Mario Jorge Mendonça & Adolfo Sachsida, 2016. "An Evaluation of the Non-Neutrality of Money," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/293qice3lj861rvos9ns14n0h0 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Hsiao, Cheng & Fujiki, Hiroshi, 1998. "Nonstationary Time-Series Modeling versus Structural Equation Modeling: With an Application to Japanese Money Demand," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 16(1), pages 57-79, May.
    21. Irina Zviadadze, 2017. "Term Structure of Consumption Risk Premia in the Cross Section of Currency Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1529-1566, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0008520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.