IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-01750-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recommendations for metaverse governance based on technical standards

Author

Listed:
  • Lijuan Yang

    (Lanzhou University)

Abstract

Technical standards in digital technology can now be utilised to gather numerous digital sub-universes into the metaverse. However, how to create and implement guidance for the metaverse based on technical standards remains unexplored. This study investigated the theoretical framework and policy implications for future technical standards-based metaverse governance (TS-MG). The methodology entailed reviewing the available metaverse governance literature to establish both theoretical and case analyses of practices based on the economics of standards and the theory of networks. This study found that TS-MG encompasses the formulation, security, and compatibility of technical standards. TS-MG should enable the first-mover advantage of standards formulation for standard-setting organisations. It also includes phased governance policies that balance the compatibility and security of standards in the initial, growth, and mature stages of the metaverse. This study highlights the necessity of cooperation among governments, standard-setting organisations, and enterprises to (1) accelerate the development of systemised standards and (2) promote the effective supply of metaverse standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijuan Yang, 2023. "Recommendations for metaverse governance based on technical standards," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01750-7
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01750-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-01750-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-01750-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Farrell & Garth Saloner, 1985. "Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(1), pages 70-83, Spring.
    2. Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu, 2018. "Strategic Compatibility Choice, Network Alliance, and Welfare," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 245-252, June.
    3. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2019. "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 541-577, October.
    4. Meltzer, Joshua P., 2019. "Governing Digital Trade," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(S1), pages 23-48, April.
    5. Freddy Cepeda-López & Fredy Gamboa-Estrada & Carlos León & Hernán Rincón-Castro, 2019. "The evolution of world trade from 1995 to 2014: A network approach," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 452-485, May.
    6. Trommer, Silke, 2017. "The WTO in an Era of Preferential Trade Agreements: Thick and Thin Institutions in Global Trade Governance," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 501-526, July.
    7. Oz Shy, 2011. "A Short Survey of Network Economics," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(2), pages 119-149, March.
    8. Shy,Oz, 2001. "The Economics of Network Industries," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521805001.
    9. Neeraj, R. S., 2019. "Trade Rules for the Digital Economy: Charting New Waters at the WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(S1), pages 121-141, April.
    10. Erik Marel & Martina Francesca Ferracane, 2021. "Do data policy restrictions inhibit trade in services?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(4), pages 727-776, November.
    11. Shuzhong Ma & Jiwen Guo & Hongsheng Zhang, 2019. "Policy Analysis and Development Evaluation of Digital Trade: An International Comparison," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 27(3), pages 49-75, May.
    12. Erik van der Marel, 2019. "Old Wine in New Bottles – How Protectionism Takes Hold of Digital Trade," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(4), pages 737-739, November.
    13. Blind, Knut & Petersen, Sören S. & Riillo, Cesare A.F., 2017. "The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 249-264.
    14. Ekaterina Prytkova & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "On the basis of brain: neural-network-inspired changes in general-purpose chips," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(4), pages 1031-1055.
    15. Cantner, Uwe & Vannuccini, Simone, 2021. "Pervasive technologies and industrial linkages: Modeling acquired purposes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 386-399.
    16. Nivedita Sen, 2018. "Understanding the Role of the WTO in International Data Flows: Taking the Liberalization or the Regulatory Autonomy Path?," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 323-348.
    17. José M. Gaspar, 2020. "Paul Krugman: contributions to Geography and Trade," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 99-115, April.
    18. Alvarez Leon, Luis F., 2021. "Digital trade and the remaking of the North American regional economy," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 50, pages 59-69.
    19. Knut Blind & Axel Mangelsdorf & Crispin Niebel & Florian Ramel, 2018. "Standards in the global value chains of the European Single Market," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 28-48, January.
    20. Genus, Audley & Stirling, Andy, 2018. "Collingridge and the dilemma of control: Towards responsible and accountable innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 61-69.
    21. Susan Ariel Aaronson & Patrick Leblond, 2018. "Another Digital Divide: The Rise of Data Realms and its Implications for the WTO," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 245-272.
    22. Manfred Elsig & Sebastian Klotz, 2022. "Initiator conditions and the diffusion of digital trade-related provisions in PTAs," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 292-308, March.
    23. Keman Huang & Stuart Madnick & Nazli Choucri & Fang Zhang, 2021. "A Systematic Framework to Understand Transnational Governance for Cybersecurity Risks from Digital Trade," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 625-638, November.
    24. Javier López González & Marie-Agnes Jouanjean, 2017. "Digital Trade: Developing a Framework for Analysis," OECD Trade Policy Papers 205, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferracane,Martina Francesca & Van Der Marel,Erik Leendert, 2021. "Regulating Personal Data : Data Models and Digital Services Trade," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9596, The World Bank.
    2. Alan A. Ahi & Noemi Sinkovics & Rudolf R. Sinkovics, 2023. "E-commerce Policy and the Global Economy: A Path to More Inclusive Development?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 27-56, February.
    3. Mileva, Elitza & Siegfried, Nikolaus, 2012. "Oil market structure, network effects and the choice of currency for oil invoicing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 385-394.
    4. Ekaterina Prytkova, 2021. "ICT's Wide Web: a System-Level Analysis of ICT's Industrial Diffusion with Algorithmic Links," Jena Economics Research Papers 2021-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    5. Heggedal, Tom-Reiel & Helland, Leif & Neset Joslin, Knut-Eric, 2018. "Should I Stay or should I Go? Bandwagons in the lab," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 86-97.
    6. Corrado Benassi & Marcella Scrimitore, 2017. "Income Distribution in Network Markets," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 251-271, September.
    7. Domenico Buccella & Luciano Fanti & Luca Gori, 2023. "Strategic product compatibility in network industries," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 141-168, October.
    8. Kemppainen, Kari, 2008. "Integrating European retail payment systems : some economics of SEPA," Research Discussion Papers 22/2008, Bank of Finland.
    9. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:4:p:23-28 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Chang, Sungyong & Park, Sanghyun, 2021. "Borders of Network Effects and Early Internationalization as a Latecomer Strategy," SocArXiv d74he, Center for Open Science.
    11. Pekka Sääskilahti, 2016. "Buying Decision Coordination and Monopoly Pricing of Network Goods," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 313-333, April.
    12. Florian W. Barholomae, 2018. "Digital Transformation, International Competition and Specialization," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 19(04), pages 23-28, December.
    13. Michael C. Christensen & Dahlia Remler, 2007. "Information and Communications Technology in Chronic Disease Care: Why is Adoption So Slow and Is Slower Better?," NBER Working Papers 13078, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Kim, Dongwook & Kim, Sungbum, 2022. "How do standards committees affect the success of a standard? Comparative analysis of RCS and VoLTE and proposed hybrid standards development model of open and bandwagon approaches," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8).
    15. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2008_022 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Conrad, Klaus, 2004. "Network effects, Compatibility and the Environment : The Case of Hydrogen Powered Cars," Discussion Papers 613, Institut fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Abteilung fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre.
    17. Navarro, Noemí, 2012. "Price and quality decisions under network effects," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 263-270.
    18. Qinqin Wu & Mengjie Bi & Faiza Siddiqui & Yao Tang, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Digital Trade on Enterprise Competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Companies," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 329-362, December.
    19. Oz Shy, 2011. "A Short Survey of Network Economics," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(2), pages 119-149, March.
    20. Manfred Elsig & Sebastian Klotz, 2021. "Digital Trade Rules in Preferential Trade Agreements: Is There a WTO Impact?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 25-36, May.
    21. Deng, Xin & Li, Qian Cher & Mateut, Simona, 2022. "Participation in setting technology standards and the implied cost of equity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    22. Duan, Yongrui & Feng, Yixuan, 2021. "Optimal pricing in social networks considering reference price effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01750-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.