IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v60y2009i4d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A branch-and-bound algorithm for a two-machine flowshop scheduling problem with limited waiting time constraints

Author

Listed:
  • B-J Joo

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Y-D Kim

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a two-machine flowshop scheduling problem in which the waiting time of each job between the two machines cannot be greater than a certain time period. For the problem with the objective of minimizing makespan, we identify several dominance properties of the problem and develop a branch-and-bound (B&B) algorithm using the dominance properties. Computational tests are performed on randomly generated test problems for evaluation of performance of the B&B algorithm, and results show that the algorithm can solve problems with up to 150 jobs in a reasonable amount of CPU time.

Suggested Citation

  • B-J Joo & Y-D Kim, 2009. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for a two-machine flowshop scheduling problem with limited waiting time constraints," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(4), pages 572-582, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:60:y:2009:i:4:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602598
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602598
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Ignall & Linus Schrage, 1965. "Application of the Branch and Bound Technique to Some Flow-Shop Scheduling Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 400-412, June.
    2. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    3. Kim, Yeong-Dae, 1995. "Minimizing total tardiness in permutation flowshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 541-555, September.
    4. J M Framinan & J N D Gupta & R Leisten, 2004. "A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1243-1255, December.
    5. Kim, Yeong-Dae & Lim, Hyeong-Gyu & Park, Moon-Won, 1996. "Search heuristics for a flowshop scheduling problem in a printed circuit board assembly process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 124-143, May.
    6. Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Stafford, Edward Jr., 2006. "Flowshop scheduling research after five decades," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 699-711, March.
    7. B. J. Lageweg & J. K. Lenstra & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1978. "A General Bounding Scheme for the Permutation Flow-Shop Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 53-67, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    2. Li, Wei & Nault, Barrie R. & Ye, Honghan, 2019. "Trade-off balancing in scheduling for flow shop production and perioperative processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 817-830.
    3. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén, 2010. "Genetic algorithms with path relinking for the minimum tardiness permutation flowshop problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 57-67, February.
    4. Gmys, Jan & Mezmaz, Mohand & Melab, Nouredine & Tuyttens, Daniel, 2020. "A computationally efficient Branch-and-Bound algorithm for the permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 814-833.
    5. Sündüz Dağ, 2013. "An Application On Flowshop Scheduling," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 1(1), pages 47-56, December.
    6. M Haouari & T Ladhari, 2003. "A branch-and-bound-based local search method for the flow shop problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(10), pages 1076-1084, October.
    7. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    8. Fernando Luis Rossi & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2022. "Beam search-based heuristics for the mixed no-idle flowshop with total flowtime criterion," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1311-1346, December.
    9. Olivier Ploton & Vincent T’kindt, 2023. "Moderate worst-case complexity bounds for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem using Inclusion–Exclusion," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 137-145, April.
    10. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2015. "New hard benchmark for flowshop scheduling problems minimising makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 666-677.
    11. Blazewicz, Jacek & Domschke, Wolfgang & Pesch, Erwin, 1996. "The job shop scheduling problem: Conventional and new solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-33, August.
    12. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén, 2009. "Cooperative metaheuristics for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 365-376, March.
    13. Naderi, Bahman & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "A scatter search algorithm for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 323-334.
    14. Lei Shang & Christophe Lenté & Mathieu Liedloff & Vincent T’Kindt, 2018. "Exact exponential algorithms for 3-machine flowshop scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 227-233, April.
    15. Lee, Wen-Chiung & Chung, Yu-Hsiang, 2013. "Permutation flowshop scheduling to minimize the total tardiness with learning effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 327-334.
    16. Ruiz, Rubén & Pan, Quan-Ke & Naderi, Bahman, 2019. "Iterated Greedy methods for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 213-222.
    17. Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2006. "Performance guarantees for flowshop heuristics to minimize makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 865-872, March.
    18. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    19. Chen, Shih-Hsin & Chen, Min-Chih, 2013. "Addressing the advantages of using ensemble probabilistic models in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 24-33.
    20. Matthias Bultmann & Sigrid Knust & Stefan Waldherr, 2018. "Flow shop scheduling with flexible processing times," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 809-829, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:60:y:2009:i:4:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.