IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v141y2013i1p24-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the advantages of using ensemble probabilistic models in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for scheduling problems

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Shih-Hsin
  • Chen, Min-Chih

Abstract

Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs) have recently been recognized as a prominent alternative to traditional evolutionary algorithms due to their increasing popularity. The core of EDAs is a probabilistic model which directly impacts performance of the algorithm. Previous EDAs have used a univariate, bi-variate, or multi-variable probabilistic model each time. However, application of only one probabilistic model may not represent the parental distribution well. This paper advocates the importance of using ensemble probabilistic models in EDAs. We combine the univariate probabilistic model with the bi-variate probabilistic model which learns different population characteristics. To explain how to employ the two probabilistic models, we proposed the Ensemble Self-Guided Genetic Algorithm (eSGGA). The extensive computation results on two NP-hard scheduling problems indicate the advantages of adopting two probabilistic models. Most important of all, eSGGA can avoid the computation effort overhead when compared with other EDAs employing two models. As a result, this paper might point out a next generation approach for EDAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Shih-Hsin & Chen, Min-Chih, 2013. "Addressing the advantages of using ensemble probabilistic models in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 24-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:141:y:2013:i:1:p:24-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312001867
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz, Ruben & Maroto, Concepcion, 2005. "A comprehensive review and evaluation of permutation flowshop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 479-494, September.
    2. U Aickelin & E K Burke & J Li, 2007. "An estimation of distribution algorithm with intelligent local search for rule-based nurse rostering," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(12), pages 1574-1585, December.
    3. George Li, 1997. "Single machine earliness and tardiness scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 546-558, February.
    4. Hansen, Pierre & Mladenovic, Nenad, 2001. "Variable neighborhood search: Principles and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 449-467, May.
    5. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    6. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.
    7. Peng Si Ow & Thomas E. Morton, 1989. "The Single Machine Early/Tardy Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 177-191, February.
    8. Pei-Chann Chang & Shih-Hsin Chen & Chin-Yuan Fan & V. Mani, 2010. "Generating artificial chromosomes with probability control in genetic algorithm for machine scheduling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 197-211, November.
    9. J M Framinan & J N D Gupta & R Leisten, 2004. "A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1243-1255, December.
    10. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Choo Jun Tan & Siew Chin Neoh & Chee Peng Lim & Samer Hanoun & Wai Peng Wong & Chu Kong Loo & Li Zhang & Saeid Nahavandi, 2019. "Application of an evolutionary algorithm-based ensemble model to job-shop scheduling," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 879-890, February.
    2. Wang, Sheng-yao & Wang, Ling & Liu, Min & Xu, Ye, 2013. "An effective estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the distributed permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 387-396.
    3. Xiong, Fuli & Xing, Keyi & Wang, Feng, 2015. "Scheduling a hybrid assembly-differentiation flowshop to minimize total flow time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 338-354.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    2. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    3. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    4. Pei-Chann Chang & Shih-Hsin Chen & Chin-Yuan Fan & V. Mani, 2010. "Generating artificial chromosomes with probability control in genetic algorithm for machine scheduling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 197-211, November.
    5. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    6. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    7. Pessoa, Luciana S. & Andrade, Carlos E., 2018. "Heuristics for a flowshop scheduling problem with stepwise job objective function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 950-962.
    8. Pagnozzi, Federico & Stützle, Thomas, 2019. "Automatic design of hybrid stochastic local search algorithms for permutation flowshop problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 409-421.
    9. Sioud, A. & Gagné, C., 2018. "Enhanced migrating birds optimization algorithm for the permutation flow shop problem with sequence dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 66-73.
    10. Li, Wei & Nault, Barrie R. & Ye, Honghan, 2019. "Trade-off balancing in scheduling for flow shop production and perioperative processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 817-830.
    11. Hatami, Sara & Ruiz, Rubén & Andrés-Romano, Carlos, 2015. "Heuristics and metaheuristics for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 76-88.
    12. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    13. Maria Raquel C. Costa & Jorge M. S. Valente & Jeffrey E. Schaller, 2020. "Efficient procedures for the weighted squared tardiness permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 487-522, September.
    14. Xiong, Fuli & Xing, Keyi & Wang, Feng, 2015. "Scheduling a hybrid assembly-differentiation flowshop to minimize total flow time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 338-354.
    15. Bo Liu & Ling Wang & Ying Liu & Shouyang Wang, 2011. "A unified framework for population-based metaheuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 231-262, June.
    16. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén, 2010. "Genetic algorithms with path relinking for the minimum tardiness permutation flowshop problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 57-67, February.
    17. Framinan, Jose M. & Perez-Gonzalez, Paz, 2015. "On heuristic solutions for the stochastic flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 413-420.
    18. Pan, Quan-Ke & Wang, Ling, 2012. "Effective heuristics for the blocking flowshop scheduling problem with makespan minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 218-229, April.
    19. Rad, Shahriar Farahmand & Ruiz, Rubén & Boroojerdian, Naser, 2009. "New high performing heuristics for minimizing makespan in permutation flowshops," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 331-345, April.
    20. Pagnozzi, Federico & Stützle, Thomas, 2021. "Automatic design of hybrid stochastic local search algorithms for permutation flowshop problems with additional constraints," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:141:y:2013:i:1:p:24-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.