IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxixy2019i2p390-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition versus Monopolistic Competition by Integrating Solow-Uzawa and Dixit-Stiglitz

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Bin Zhang

    (Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University)

Abstract

This paper builds a neoclassical growth model with monopolistic competition and perfect competition. The paper synthesizes the basic economic mechanisms in neoclassical growth theory and monopolistic competition within a compact framework. The economic structure is based on the SolowUzawa growth models. We model monopolistic competition on basis of the Dixit-Stiglitz model. This paper makes a unique contribution to growth theory by making deviations from the traditional approaches in household behavior in monopolistic competition literature and markets in neoclassical growth theory. We develop and then show behavior of the model by simulation. The calibration identifies a stable unique equilibrium point. The motion of the economy is plotted. We also studies comparative dynamic processes due to changes in degree of specialization, unit labor requirement for production of intermediates, output elasticity of intermediate inputs, propensity to save, propensity to consume service, and human capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Bin Zhang, 2019. "Competition versus Monopolistic Competition by Integrating Solow-Uzawa and Dixit-Stiglitz," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 390-400, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xix:y:2019:i:2:p:390-400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/RO/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Section%20III/31.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benassy, Jean-Pascal, 1996. "Taste for variety and optimum production patterns in monopolistic competition," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 41-47, July.
    2. Nocco, Antonella & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Salto, Matteo, 2017. "Monopolistic competition and optimum product selection: Why and how heterogeneity matters," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 704-717.
    3. H. Uzawa, 1971. "On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: F. H. Hahn (ed.), Readings in the Theory of Growth, chapter 3, pages 19-26, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Bjarne S. Jensen, 2003. "Walrasian General Equilibrium Allocations and Dynamics in Two--Sector Growth Models," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(1), pages 53-87, February.
    5. Behrens, Kristian & Murata, Yasusada, 2007. "General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: A new approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 776-787, September.
    6. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    7. Lancaster, Kelvin, 1980. "Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 151-175, May.
    8. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    9. Pierre M. Picard & Eric Toulemonde, 2009. "On monopolistic competition and optimal product diversity: workers' rents also matter," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 1347-1360, November.
    10. Bjarne S. Jensen, 2003. "Walrasian General Equilibrium Allocations and Dynamics in Two‐Sector Growth Models," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(1), pages 53-87, February.
    11. Ben-David, Dan & B. Loewy, Michael, 2003. "Trade and the Neoclassical Growth Model," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 18, pages 1-16.
    12. Krugman, Paul, 1979. "A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(2), pages 253-266, April.
    13. J. E. Stiglitz, 1967. "A Two-Sector Two Class Model of Economic Growth," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(2), pages 227-238.
    14. Ethier, Wilfred J, 1982. "National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(3), pages 389-405, June.
    15. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2018. "An Integration of Solow’s Growth and Dixit-Stiglitz’s Monopolistic Competition Models," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 68(4), pages 3-19, October-D.
    16. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2008. "International Trade Theory," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-78265-0, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2018. "An Integration of Solow’s Growth and Dixit-Stiglitz’s Monopolistic Competition Models," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 68(4), pages 3-19, October-D.
    2. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2020. "Monopsony and Discrimination in Labor Market in the Solow-Stiglitz Two-Group Neoclassical Growth Model," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2022. "Stackelberg-Nash Equilibrium and Perfect Competition in the Solow-Uzawa Growth Model," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 96, pages 315-343, January-J.
    4. Prof. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2021. "An Integration of Neoclassical Growth Theory and Economic Structural Change with Monopolistic Competition Theory," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 145-164, June.
    5. Heiland, Inga & Kohler, Wilhelm, 2022. "Heterogeneous workers, trade, and migration," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Wei-bin ZHANG, 2020. "Business Cycles in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model with Monopolistic and Perfect Competition," Bingol University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bingol University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 11-33, August.
    7. repec:beo:journl:v:62:y:2018:i:216:p:7-34 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Kiminori Matsuyama, 2019. "Engel's Law in the Global Economy: Demand‐Induced Patterns of Structural Change, Innovation, and Trade," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 497-528, March.
    9. Behrens, Kristian & Kanemoto, Yoshitsugu & Murata, Yasusada, 2015. "The Henry George Theorem in a second-best world," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 34-51.
    10. Bjarne S. Jensen & Ulla Lehmijoki, 2011. "Homothetic Multisector Growth Models," DEGIT Conference Papers c016_001, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    11. Long, N.V. & Wong, K.Y., 1996. "Endogenous Growth and International Trade: A Survey," Working Papers 96-07, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    12. Behrens, Kristian & Murata, Yasusada, 2009. "City size and the Henry George Theorem under monopolistic competition," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 228-235, March.
    13. Charles I. Jones, 2019. "Paul Romer: Ideas, Nonrivalry, and Endogenous Growth," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(3), pages 859-883, July.
    14. Yvonne Wolfmayr-Schnitzer, 2000. "Economic Integration, Specialisation and the Location of Industries. A Survey of the Theoretical Literature," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 5(2), pages 73-80, May.
    15. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2015. "A Portfolio Equilibrium Model of Gold and Capital in an Integrated Walrasian General Equilibrium and Neoclassical Growth Theory," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(12), pages 616-627, December.
    16. Iwaisako, Tatsuro, 2019. "Welfare analysis of uniform entry tax in a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous industries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 54-57.
    17. Zhang Wei-Bin, 2014. "Land Value and Rent Dynamics in an Integrated Walrasian General Equilibrium and Neoclassical Growth Theory," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 61(2), pages 235-258, December.
    18. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2018. "Business Cycles In A General Equilibrium Dynamic Model With Land Value And Rent," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 63(216), pages 7-34, January –.
    19. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2021. "Equilibrio de Cournot-Nash y competencia perfecta en el modelo de crecimiento de Solow-Uzawa," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 7(15), pages 1-21, September.
    20. de Groot, Henri L. F. & Nahuis, Richard, 1998. "Taste for diversity and the optimality of economic growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 291-295, March.
    21. Pierre M. Picard & Eric Toulemonde, 2009. "On monopolistic competition and optimal product diversity: workers' rents also matter," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 1347-1360, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Dixit-Stiglitz model; monopolistic competition; Uzawa model; profit distribution; perfect competition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xix:y:2019:i:2:p:390-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.