IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v48y2021i6p799-813..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opening up science for a sustainable world: An expansive normative structure of open science in the digital era
[The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities]

Author

Listed:
  • Ruben Vicente-Saez
  • Robin Gustafsson
  • Clara Martinez-Fuentes

Abstract

New digital technologies and tools, together with evolving open physical and digital infrastructures, are remodelling science and innovation practices at universities and challenging their existing cultures, cognitive norms, missions, and policies. The purpose of this empirical study was to understand how existing and recently adopted open science practices and the underlying principles and attitudes of research teams support the advancement of knowledge and the development of actions, solutions, and technologies for sustainable development. The results of this study provide novel insights and important suggestions to guide the advancement of open science and innovation policies at universities for a sustainable economy, society, and environment—in sum, for a sustainable world. We infer a new expansive normative structure—practices, norms, and institutional goal—for open science and a new role of researchers in the digital era. Based on our findings, we propose an expansive model of university research and innovation to guide the renewal of university governance in the digital era.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruben Vicente-Saez & Robin Gustafsson & Clara Martinez-Fuentes, 2021. "Opening up science for a sustainable world: An expansive normative structure of open science in the digital era [The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneu," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(6), pages 799-813.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:6:p:799-813.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Owen & Phil Macnaghten & Jack Stilgoe, 2012. "Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(6), pages 751-760, December.
    2. Paul David, 2001. "From Keeping Natures Secrets to the Institutionalization of Open Science," Economics Series Working Papers 2001-W23, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    3. Mukherjee, Arijit & Stern, Scott, 2009. "Disclosure or secrecy? The dynamics of Open Science," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 449-462, May.
    4. Paul A. David, 2001. "From Keeping 'Nature's Secrets' to the Institutionalization of 'Open Science'," Working Papers 01006, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
    5. Pratima Bansal & Wendy K. Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02312197, HAL.
    6. Pontus Braunerhjelm, 2007. "Academic entrepreneurship: Social norms, university culture and policies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(9), pages 619-631, November.
    7. Pratima Bansal & Wendy K. Smith & Eero Vaara, 2018. "New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research," Post-Print hal-02276705, HAL.
    8. Vicente-Saez, Ruben & Martinez-Fuentes, Clara, 2018. "Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 428-436.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chandra Kant & Atul Shukla & Sarah K. M. McGregor & Shih-Chun Lo & Ebinazar B. Namdas & Monica Katiyar, 2023. "Large area inkjet-printed OLED fabrication with solution-processed TADF ink," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Hao Zhou & Xinyi Li & Xiaoli Li, 2023. "Can the Digital Economy Improve the Level of High-Quality Financial Development? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Mingxia Liu & Wei Jiang, 2022. "Empirical Research on the Influence Mechanisms of Digital Resources Input on Service Innovation in China’s Finance Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Studer, Roman, 2008. "India and the Great Divergence: Assessing the Efficiency of Grain Markets in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century India," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 393-437, June.
    2. Ilse Svensson de Jong, 2021. "When Wrong Is Right: Leaving Room for Error in Innovation Measurement," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    4. Paul A. David & Louise C. Keely, 2003. "The Economics of Scientific Research Coalitions: Collaborative Network Formation in the Presence of Multiple Funding Agencies," Chapters, in: Aldo Geuna & Ammon J. Salter & W. Edward Steinmueller (ed.), Science and Innovation, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    6. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Jacob Weisdorf & Paul Sharp, 2009. "From preventive to permissive checks: the changing nature of the Malthusian relationship between nuptiality and the price of provisions in the nineteenth century," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 3(1), pages 55-70, January.
    8. repec:oxf:wpaper:69.2 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Schlepphorst, Susanne & Welter, Friederike & Holz, Michael, 2022. "Die gesellschaftliche Wertschöpfung des Mittelstands," IfM-Materialien 292, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    10. Chalkley, Martin & Malcomson, James M., 2002. "Cost sharing in health service provision: an empirical assessment of cost savings," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 219-249, May.
    11. Regina Grafe & Camilla Brautaset, 2006. "The Quiet Transport Revolution: Returns to Scale, Scope and Network Density in Norway`s Nineteenth-Century Sailing Fleet," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _062, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    12. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2241 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Turienzo, Javier & Cabanelas, Pablo & Lampón, Jesús F., 2023. "Business models in times of disruption: The connected and autonomous vehicles (uncertain) domino effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Jane Humphries & Tim Leunig, 2007. "Cities, Market Integration and Going to Sea: Stunting and the Standard of Living in Early Nineteenth-Century England and Wales," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _066, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    15. Ming-Jer Chen, 2018. "Scholarship-practice “oneness” of an academic career: The entrepreneurial pursuit of an expansive view of management scholarship," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 859-886, December.
    16. José Satsumi López-Morales & Héctor Francisco Salazar-Núñez & Claudia Guadalupe Zarrabal-Gutiérrez, 2022. "The impact of qualitative methods on article citation: an international business research perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3225-3236, June.
    17. Asadullah, Mohammad Niaz, 2010. "Educational Disparity in East and West Pakistan, 1947-71: Was East Pakistan Discriminated Against?," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 33(3), pages 1-46, September.
    18. Schiele, Holger & Krummaker, Stefan & Hoffmann, Petra & Kowalski, Rita, 2022. "The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 280-296.
    19. Daudin, Guillaume, 2010. "Domestic Trade and Market Size in Late-Eighteenth-Century France," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(3), pages 716-743, September.
    20. Wu, Juan & Wang, Daojuan & Morschett, Dirk, 2023. "Light Touch Goes Where? A Longitudinal Study of the Post-Acquisition Integration Paths Adopted by Chinese Multinational Enterprises," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    21. Asadullah, Mohammad Niaz, 2010. "Educational Disparity in East and West Pakistan, 1947-71: Was East Pakistan Discriminated Against?," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 33(3), pages 1-46, September.
    22. Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Thyholdt, Sverre Braathen, 2019. "Absorptive capacity and energy efficiency in manufacturing firms – An empirical analysis in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 978-990.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:6:p:799-813.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.